medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2015, Number 07

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2015; 83 (07)

Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer

Becerra-Alcántara GI, Círigo-Villagómez LL, Ramos-Medina F, Robledo-Martínez H, Mar-Merinos CG, Panzi-Altamirano RM

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 400-407
PDF size: 610.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the spearfishing or neddle-guided biopsy to breast cancer and no palpable mammography and ultrasound findings suspicious for malignancy.
Material and methods: Observational, transversal, prolective, and descriptive study was made. A histopathological diagnosis were conducted from August 2004 to December 2011 in the Radiology and Image Departmen of Centro Médico La Raza to patients sent by the service of Surgical Oncology with non-palpable breast findings identified by mammography and/or ultrasound with any suspicion of malignancy. Radiographic and ultrasonographic images of the specimen were obtained after the surgical procedure.
Results: Harpoon 532 placements with histopathological report. Malignancies were 4.0% of the biopsies were performed in negative mammograms (ACR BI-RADS® 3) and 34.3% (p ≤ 0.05) of which were performed in positive mammography: 19.5% of mammograms ACR BI-4 and RADS® 89.7% (p ‹0.0001) of mammograms ACR BI-RADS® 5. The negative mammography (ACR BI-RADS® 3) which resulted in cancer occurred in a patient with a personal history of breast cancer who had a solid nodule in one breast. In the evaluation of mammography studies and placing seven harpoons participated certified radiologists and additional qualification in breast imaging, and five radiology technicians trained in mammography.
Conclusions: The positive cases In the evaluation of mammography studies and placing seven harpoons participated certified radiologists and additional qualification in breast imaging, and five radiology technicians trained in mammography. (sum of the ACR BI-RADS® cases 4 and ACR BI-RADS® 5) and individual cases ACR BI-RADS® 4 had a PPV within recommended ranges ACR BI-RADS®; PPV ACR BI-RADS® may was lower than recommended by the literature, although most recommended by other series, which forces us to emphasize adherence to the semiotics suggested by ACR BI-RADS® and avoid unnecessary surgery. Patients with a personal history of breast cancer and finding a new ACR BI-RADS® 3 should have an individual assessment and consider biopsy before the short-term monitoring.


REFERENCES

  1. Cárdenas SJ, Erazo VA, Maafs ME, Poitevin CA. Consenso Nacional sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer mamario. Cuarta revisión. Colima: Elsevier, 2011.

  2. Navari GF, Ortíz IC, Zúñiga LD. Técnica de marcaje con guía ultrasonográfica y mastográfica previas a la obtención de biopsia de mama por escisión. Ginecol Obst Mex 2009;77:261-1.

  3. Cerrato N, López RL, Ortiz IC. Correlación radiológicapatológica de las biopsias de mama realizadas en el Centro Médico ABC. Anales de Radiología Mex 2005;4:305-10.

  4. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS. Mammography. 4th ed. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA. American College of Radiology 2003.

  5. Pina L, Apesteguía L, De Luis E, Sáenz BJ, Zornoza G, Domínguez C. Biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of non palpable mammary lesions. Anales Sist Sanit Navar 2004;27(3).

  6. Kopans DB. La mama en imagen. 2ª ed. Madrid: Marban, 1999; 637-720.

  7. Gallagher W, Cardenosa G, Rubens J. Minimal-volume excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. AJR 1989;153:957-961.

  8. Liberman L. Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI). AJR 1999; 172: 413-6.

  9. Sickles EA. Management of Probably Benign Breast Lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:1123-1130.

  10. Magrach LA. Neddle-guided breast biopsy in mammographic lesions: experience in our hospital. Cirugía Española 2002;71:9-13.

  11. Maafs ME, López GC, Lara TC, Curiel VJ, Cuellar HM, Beltrán OA. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de lesiones mamarias no palpables. Cir Cir 1999;67:97-101.

  12. Basset J. Diagnosis of Diseases of the Breast, 1997.

  13. Stoopen ME, García MR. Avances en diagnóstico por imágenes. Mama 2010; 144-145.

  14. Ciatto S, Rosselli TM, Giorgi D, Morrone D, Catarzi S, Ambrogetti D. Non-palpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography. Eur J Cancer 1994;30:40-44.

  15. Apesteguía L, Pina L, Inchusta M, Mellado M, Franquet T, De Miguel C. Nonpalpable, well-defined, probably benign breast nodule: management by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and long-interval follow-up mammography. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1235-1239.

  16. Subh SJ, Delgado GF, Vizcaíno EI, Ponce M, Torres GV, Martin DJ. Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of nonpalpable breast lesions. A study of 160 biopsies. Cir Española 2000;67:38-44.

  17. NOM-041-SSA2 Para la prevención, diagnóstico, tratamiento, control y vigilancia epidemiológica del cáncer de mama. Diario Oficial, 17 de septiembre, 2003.

  18. Markopoulos C, Kouskos E, Revenas K, Mantas D, Antonopoulou Z, Kontzoglou K, et al. Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions detected don screening mammography. Eur. J. Gynaec Oncol 2005;26:311-314.

  19. Hernández CN, Sandoval GF, Hernández GM, Torres LA, y col. Lesiones de mama no palpables sospechosas de malignidad. Correlación radiológica-quirúrgica (Hospital General de México). Gamo 2007;6:2:42-46.

  20. Cardenosa G. Imagenología mamaria. 1a ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Journal, 2005.

  21. Martin RJ, Sandoval GF, Rios RR, Biopsia de lesiones mamarias no palpables mediante marcaje con arpón guiado por estereotaxia. Annales de Radiología México 2003;23-27.

  22. Duarte RV, Valls JC, Marqués F, Paredes R, Betancourt L, Zénzola V, Hidalgo F, Alvarez MJ, Alvins A. Radiolocalización con arpón en lesiones subclínicas de la mama. Experiencia del Instituto de Oncología Luis Razetti. Rev Venez Oncol 2001;13:137-142.

  23. Razmilic D, Cordero L, Gónzalez P, Passalacqua H. Biopsia pércutánea de mama. II Jornada Chilena de Consenso en cáncer de mama, 2003.

  24. Carro AB, Saínz MJ, Lamata HF, Fernandez GJ, Villavieja AJ. Rendimiento diagnóstico de la mastografía en pacientes con lesiones clínicamente ocultas. Análisis de 1005 lesiones. Rev Med Univ Navarra 2006;50:21-25.

  25. Davanzo C, Astorga AM, Pineda DG, Cárdenas BS, León FF, Pineda DR, et al. Lesiones no palpables de mama. Experien-cia de biopsias radioquirúrgicas en el Hospital Víctor Ríos Ruiz. Revista Médico Científica Facultad de Medicina siglo XXI.

  26. Círigo VL, Becerra AG, Ramos MF, Panzi AR, Robledo MH, Vázquez CJ. Características mastográficas y ultrasonográficas de los hallazgos categoría ACR BI-RADS 3 y reporte histopatológico. Anales de Radiología México 2010;3:117-122.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com