medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2014; 27 (3)

Conjunctival diseases of patients with ocular prothesis

Ramírez GLK, Martínez PAI, Gómez CCG, Díaz AM, Rojas RI, Carrazana PY

Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 390-402
PDF size: 214.16 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objectives: to determine the conjunctival diseases of patients with ocular prosthesis.
Methods: prospective, longitudinal, descriptive and observational study of 62 patients (65 anophthalmic cavities) who went to the Oculoplasty service of "Ramon Pando Ferrer" Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from May to December 2010. Age, sex, causes of eye loss, affected eye, conjunctival disease, type of cavity, length of time of prosthesis use, microbiological result, hygienic handling and response to treatment were the analyzed variables.
Results: in the studied group, the 40-59 y age group accounted for 37,1 % of patients; males were predominant with 66,1 %. Traumatism was observed in 40,3 %, being the right eye the most affected in 50 % of cases. Likewise, 33,8 % presented with allergic conjunctivitis and 18,5 % had conjunctival retractions. Atypical cavities represented 67,5 % with over 366 days of using the ocular prosthesis. The positive microbiological result was found in 55 cavities for 84,6 %. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 70,9 % of cavities and 41,5 % with daily handling of the ocular prosthesis. The response to treatment was good in 76,4 % of patients.
Conclusions: conjunctival diseases in patients with ocular prosthesis are a health problem. Similarly, most of the anophthalmic cavities are atypical in adults with loss of eyeball from traumatism. Allergic conjunctivitis and conjunctival retraction are the most frequent illnesses in the patients wearing ocular prosthesis for more than one year, due to Staphylococcus aureus presence resulting from frequent hygienic handling of the prosthesis. The majority of patients positively responded to treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Ramírez García LK, Gómez Cabrera C, Díaz Azze M. Cavidades anoftálmicas atípicas. Rev. Cubana Oftalmol. 2010;23(1):49-56.

  2. Carracheo Rodríguez RS, Zetina Mejía CA. Colgajo libre antebraquial para la reconstrucción de la órbita anoftálmica. Cir Plast. 2009;19(1):61-7.

  3. Noya Cabaña A, Llamos Durive R, Rodríguez Acosta C, Rojas Hernández N, Castro Sánchez N, Méndez Duque de Estrada AM. Incidencia y fármaco-resistencia de cepas de Staphylococcus spp. aislados de exudados conjuntivales. Rev Cub Oftalmol. 2010;23(1):568-79.

  4. López-Sánchez E, España GE, Bueno RM, Francés Muñoz E, Menezo JJ. Estudio microbiológico de la conjuntiva en portadores de prótesis esclero-corneales. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2001;76(11):669-79.

  5. Takahagi RV, Goncalves F, Schellini SA, Padovani CR. Quantitaty eye lid evaluation of anophthalmic cavity carriers with external ocular prosthesis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;68(4):517-20.

  6. Narikawa S, Schellini S, Padovani A, Pereira CR. Alterações dos cíliosem portadores de cavidades anoftálmicas. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007;70(1):51-4.

  7. Nicodemo D, Ferreira LM. Questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;69(4):463-70.

  8. Alonso Travieso ML, Álvarez Rivero A, Borrego Brito BO. Rehabilitación ocular en niños. Rev Invest Medicoquir. 2005;7(1):25-30.

  9. Colectivo de autores. Procederes básicos clínicos en prótesis bucomaxilofacial. La Habana: Ed. CIMEQ; 2008.

  10. Oum BS, Lee JS, han YS. Clinicalfeatures of ocular trauma in emergency departament. Kor J Ophthalmol. 2007;18(1):70-8.

  11. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Epidemiology of Blinding trauma in the United States Eye Injury Registry. Ophth Epidemiol. 2008;13(3):209-16.

  12. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmol. 1996;103(2):240-3.

  13. Soliman MM, Macky TA. Pattern of ocular trauma in Egypt. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(2):205-12.

  14. Coelho M. Estudo sobre as causas mais frequentes de perdas oculares. Arquitos em Odontologia, Belo Horizonte. 2004;40(3):207-86.

  15. Carriello AJ, Moraes NS, Mitne S, Oita CS, Fontes BM, Melo LA Jr. Epidemiological findings of ocular trauma in childhood. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007;70(2):271-5.

  16. Karaman K, Gverovic-Antonica A, Rogosic V, Lakos-Krzelj V, Rozga A, Radocaj- Perko S. Epidemiology of adult eye injuries in Split-Dalmatian county. Croat Med J. 2009;45(3):304-9.

  17. Mansouri MR, Mirshahi A, Hosseini M. Domestic ocular injuries: a case series Epidemiology of childhood ocular trauma in a northeastern Colombian region. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(4):654-9.

  18. Jordan D. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;20(5):374-80.

  19. Sardiñas Alayón SE, Pérez Leyva ME. Resultados de la Red Nacional de Rehabilitación de la cara y prótesis bucomaxilofacial. Segundo año del sistema estadístico. La Habana: Dirección Nacional de Estomatología; 2003.

  20. Ueta M, Kinoshita S. Innate immunity of the ocular surface. Brain Res Bull. 2010;81(2-3):219-28.

  21. Lukats O. Contracted anophthalmic socket repair. Orbit. 2008;21(2):125-30.

  22. Tomimatsu MM, Barbosa MMVC, Yu CZ, Hirai FE, Höfling-lima L. Avaliação da microbiota ocular em pacientes com disfunção do filme lacrimal. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2009;68(6):332-7.

  23. Clauser L, Sarti E, Dallera V, Galie M. Integrated reconstructive strategies for treating the anophthalmic orbit. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(5):285-90.

  24. Soll DB. Evolution and current Concepts in the surgical treatment of the anophthalmic orbit. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;2(3):163.

  25. Miranda S, Pereira F, Menezes D. Mitomicina C colírio como tratamento para granuloma piogênico em cavidade anoftálmica. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;69(5):683-6.

  26. Falcón Márquez I. Experiencia en nuestro centro con el uso de implantes orbitarios de hidroxiapatita porosa HAP-200. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2011 [citado 23 de enero de 2013];10(1):[aprox 11 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1729519X2011000100012&script=sci_arttext

  27. Mattos Beatriz SC, Montagna MC, Fernandes CS, Sabora Antonio CL. The pediatric patient at a maxillofacial service: eye prosthesis. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(3):247-51.

  28. Vittorino M, Serrano F, Suárez F. Enucleación y evisceración: estudio de 370 casos. Resultados y complicaciones. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82(8):495-99.

  29. Herrera Soto M, Falcón Márquez I, Agramonte Centelles I, Gómez Cabrera C. Utilización de injerto dermograso en pacientes con retracción de la cavidad anoftálmica. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2003 [citado 23 de enero de 2013];16(2):[aprox 15 p]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S086421762003000200006

  30. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Parte VIII. Cap 11: Clinical Approach to Corneal. En: External Disease and Cornea. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2008-2009. p. 180-7.

  31. Almeida D, Nuno F. Avaliaca҄o microbiológica de cavidade anoftálmica e de prótesis oculares acrílicas/Bacteriological evaluation of anophthalmic socket and the ocular prótesis surface. Odontol. 1998;(16)1:19-26.

  32. Orestes Cardoso MS, Soares Carneiro SC, Egito Vasconcelos BC, Rocha Meloll A. Microorganisms in conjunctival secretion in patients with ocular prosthesis. Camaragibe: Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilofac. 2011;11(2):109-14.

  33. Brito Díaz R, Henrique Cardim R, Leite Pereira S, Pena Coto N. Estudio microbiológico de la fosa orbitaria en portadores de prótesis ocular. Rev Internac Prót estomatol. 2005;7(2):140-3.

  34. Navarro R. Adaptación de prótesis ocular. Colombia: Rev Franja vis. 2008; 102:30-4.

  35. Liste C, González-Meijome JM, Parafita Ma. Adaptación de prótesis oculares. Rev Esp Contactol. 2007;13:61-6.

  36. Agramonte Centelles I. Cavidades anoftálmicas. En: Río Torres M. Oftalmología. Criterios y tendencias actuales. La Habana: Ciencias Médicas; 2009. p. 21-3.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com