Performance of irrigated pasture, established for grazing dairy cattle in temperate climate

Vicente Lemus Ramírez; José Guadalupe García-Muñiz; Sara Guadalupe Lugo León; Ernesto Valencia Gutiérrez; Benjamín Villagrán Vélez

2002, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Vet Mex 2002; 33 (1)

Performance of irrigated pasture, established for grazing dairy cattle in temperate climate

Lemus RV, García-Muñiz JG, Lugo LSG, Valencia GE, Villagrán VB

Full text

How to cite this article

Language: English/Spanish
References: 41
Page: 11-26
PDF size: 179.36 Kb.

ABSTRACT

A three-year grazing experiment was carried out in central Mexico in order to measure botanical composition, nutritional value and pasture growth rate, and to determine the relationship between pasture height and herbage mass of a mixed grass (Lolium perenne, Festuca arundinacea and Dactylis glomerata) legume (Medicago sativa and Trifolium repens) sward. The pasture was flood-irrigated, and grazed throughout the year by lactating Holstein dairy cows. The pasture’s botanical composition was determined using manual dissection techniques. The pasture’s nutritional value was determined through the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility (IVDMD), and its crude protein (CP) content. Energy content of pasture samples, expressed as megajoules (MJ) of metabolizable energy (ME) per kg of DM, was determined from the IVDMD values. Pasture growth rates were calculated from the monthly records of herbage mass determination, and the relationship between pasture’s height and herbage mass was determined using a linear regression. On average, the pasture’s botanical composition included 70% grass and 30% legumes. The relationship between pasture height and herbage mass was linear and, on average, pasture herbage mass increased 219 (r2 = 87.0, CV = 6%); 206 (r2 = 77.0, CV = 8%); 107.4 (r2 = 60.0, CV = 9%) kg DM by each centimeter increase in pasture’s height during spring, summer and autumn, respectively. On average, pastures yielded 17.22 tons DM/hectare/year during the three-year grazing experiment. The fastest pasture’s growth rates (38 to 63 kg DM/hectare/day) were obtained during the spring-autumn period, and the slowest ones (32 to 40 kg DM/hectare/day) during winter. Throughout the year for the three-year study, the pasture’s IVDMD, CP content, and ME concentration were 65%, 19.5%, and 9.6 MJ ME/kg DM, respectively. Variations observed on pasture’s production and nutritional value were due to an insufficient supply of irrigation water and low fertilizer doses applied, and not to adverse effects of the grazing animals on the pasture. It is concluded that under the conditions of this study the pasture’s nutritional value, botanical composition, and pasture growth rates were adequate for the feeding of lactating grazing dairy cattle.

REFERENCES

1. FIRA. Boletín informativo. Producción de leche y carne a bajo costo en Teziutlán, Pue. México (DF): Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación con la Agricultura, 1994;260:2-8.
2. Clark DA, Kannegati VR. Grazing management system for dairy cattle. In: Cherney JH, Cherney DJR, editors. Grass for dairy cattle. New York: CAB International, 1998:311-334.
3. Bryant AM. Dairying in New Zealand. In: Baker MJ, editor. Grassland for our world. Wellington (NZ): SIR Publishing, 1993:574-575.
4. Holmes CW. Pasture for dairy cattle. In: Nicol AM, editor. Livestock feeding on pasture. Occasional publication No. 10. Hamilton (NZ): New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 1987:133-145.
5. Holmes CW, Wilson GF. Milk production from pasture. Wellington (NZ): Butterworths of New Zealand Ltd., 1987.
6. Vazquez OP, Smith TR. Evaluation of alternative algorithms used to simulate pasture intake in grazing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001;84:860-872.
7. Dartt BA, Lloyd JW, Radke BR, Black JR, Kaneene JB. A comparison of profitability and economic efficiencies between management- intensive grazing and conventionally managed dairies in Michigan. J Dairy Sci 1999;82:2412-2420.
8. Parker WJ, Muller LD, Buckmaster RD. Management and economic implications of intensive grazing on dairy farms in the northeastern states. J Dairy Sci 1992;75:2587-2597.
9. Sheath GW, Hay RJM, Giles KH. Managing pastures for grazing animals. In: Nicol AM, editor. Livestock feeding on pasture. Occasional publication No. 10. Hamilton (NZ): New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 1987:65-74.
10. Milligan KE, Brookes IM, Thompson KF. Feed planning on pasture. In: Nicol AM, editor. Livestock feeding on pasture. Occasional publication No. 10. Hamilton (NZ): New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 1987:75-88.
11. Nix JS. Economic aspects of grass production and utilization. In: Holmes W, editor. Grass its production and utilization 2nd ed. London (UK): The British Grassland Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989:214-239.
12. Moore KC. Economics of grass for dairy cattle. In: Cherney JH, Cherney DJR, editors. Grass for dairy cattle. New York: CAB International, 1998:373-391.
13. Buxton, DR, Fales SL. Plant environment and quality. In: Fahey GC, editor. Forage quality, evaluation and utilization. Madison (Ne): University of Nebraska. American Society of Agronomy, 1994:155-199.
14. Korte CJ, Chu ACP, Field TRO. Pasture production. In: Nicol AM, editor. Livestock feeding on pasture. Occasional publication No. 10. Hamilton (NZ): New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 1987:7-20.
15. Holmes W. Grazing management. In: Holmes W, editor. Grass its production and utilization. 2nd ed. London (UK): The British Grassland Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989:130-171.
16. O’Connor KF. Pasture and soil fertility. In: Langer RHM, editor. Pastures. Their ecology and management. Auckland (NZ): Oxford University Press,1990:157-196.
17. Parsons AJ, Chapman DF. Principles of grass growth and pasture utilization. In: Cherney JH, Cherney DJR, editors. Grass for dairy cattle. New York: CAB International, 1998:283-309.
18. Cailey JWD, Bird PR. Techniques for measuring pastures. 2nd ed. Victoria, Australia: Pastoral and Veterinary Institute Hamilton, 1996.
19. Hodgson J. Grazing management. Science into practice. London (UK): Longman Group Limited, 1990.
20. Archer S. Assessing and interpreting grass-woody plant dynamics. A functional interpretation. In: Hodgson J, Illius QW, editors. The ecology and management of grazing systems. Wallingford, Oxford (UK): CAB International, 1996:101-134.
21. Hoffman K, Muller LD, Fales SL, Holden LA. Quality evaluation and concentrate supplementation of rotational pasture grazed by lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:2651-2663.
22. McCormick ME, Ward JD, Redfearn DD, French DD, Blouin DC, Chapa AM, Fernandez JM. Supplemental dietary protein for grazing dairy cows effects on pasture intake and lactation performance. J Dairy Sci 2001;84:896-907.
23. Smetham ML. Pasture management. In: Langer RHM, editor. Pastures. Their ecology and management. Auckland (NZ): Oxford University Press, 1990:197-240.
24. Laca EA, Demment MW. Foraging strategies of grazing animals. A functional interpretation. In: Hodgson J, Illius QW, editors. The ecology and management of grazing systems. Wallingford, Oxford (UK): CAB International, 1996:137-158.
25. ’t Mannetje, L. Measuring quality of grassland vegetation. In:’t Mannetje L, editor. Measurement of grassland vegetation and animal production. Bulletin 52. Hurley, Berkshire: Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops, 1978:63-65.
26. Lucas RJ, Thompson KF. Pasture assessment for livestock managers. In: Langer RHM, editor. Pastures. Their ecology and management. Auckland (NZ): Oxford University Press, 1990:241-262.
27. Harmony KR, Moore KJ, George JR, Brummer EC, Russel JR. Determination of pasture biomass using four indirect methods. Agron J 1997;89:665-672.
28. García E. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. México (DF): Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1981.
29. Holden LA, Muller LD, Fales SL. Estimation of intake in high producing Holstein cows grazing grass pasture. J Dairy Sci 1994;77:2332-2340.
30. Gekara OJ, Prigge EC, Bryan WB, Schettini M, Nestor EL, Townsend EC. Influence of pasture sward height and concentrate supplementation on intake, digestibility, and grazing time of lactating beef cows. J Anim Sci 2001;79:745-752.
31. A.O.A.C. Official methods of the association of official analytical chemists. 15th ed. Arlington (VA): Association Official Analytical Chemical, 1990.
32. Tilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassl Soc 1963;18:104-111.
33. Geenty KG, Rattray PV. The energy requirements of grazing sheep and cattle. In: Nicol AM, editor. Livestock feeding on pasture. Occasional Publication No. 10. Hamilton (NZ): New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 1987:39-53.
34. SAS. SAS®/STAT Users Guide. Version 6.12. 4th ed. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc., 1989.
35. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods 5th ed. Ames (Io): Iowa State University Press, 1980.
36. Daly GT. The grassland of New Zealand. In: Pastures: Langer RHM, editor. Pastures. Their ecology and management. Auckland (NZ): Oxford University Press, 1990:1-38.
37. Thompson KF, Poppi DP. Livestock production from pasture. In: Langer RHM, editor. Pastures. Their ecology and management. Auckland (NZ): Oxford University Press, 1990:263-283.
38. Sánchez BR, Jiménez FM, Tenorio DG. Parametrización del sistema de producción de leche en pastoreo y su evaluación económica (tesis de licenciatura). Chapingo (Edo. de México) México: Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 1996.
39. Carrizales GA, Elizarrás VR. Efecto de la asignación de forraje consumido por bovinos en una pradera asociada, gramínea (Dactilis glomerata) var. potomac y leguminosa (Medicago sativa) var. valenciana (tesis de licenciatura). Chapingo (Edo. de México) México: Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 1987.
40. Aniano AH, Ayala EJL. Producción de leche bajo pastoreo en una pradera asociada, gramínea (Dactilis glomerata) var. potomac y leguminosa (Medicago sativa) var. valenciana en Chapingo Estado de México. Primera fase (tesis de licenciatura). Chapingo (Edo. de México) México: Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 1989.
41. Apaseo RF, Carranza LS, Alemán SS. Producción de leche bajo pastoreo en una pradera de alfalfa (Medicago sativa) var. valenciana y orchard (Dactilis glomerata) var. potomac. Segunda fase (tesis de licenciatura). Chapingo (Edo. de México) México: Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 1990.