medigraphic.com

2004, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2004; 27 (1)

PIFIR model evaluation in neuropathic pain. Comparison of three antinociceptive schemes in rats

Tamayo-Valenzuela AC, López-Muñoz FJ, Guevara-López U, Lara-Solares A

Language: Spanish
References: 44
Page: 10-15
PDF size: 106.71 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: (1) To assess the effectiveness of the PIFIR model in neuropathic pain.(2) To compare the antinociceptive effect of three analgesic regimes for the control of induced pain. Material and methods: Five groups with six rats each were formed. Group A was the control group and underwent no nerve injury. All the remaining rats underwent a ligature of the sciatic nerve. Rats in Group B received no drugs. Rats in Group C were given parecoxib; rats in Group D received tramadol plus ketorolac; and rats in group E received ketamine. Function of the hind limbs was studied with the PIFIR method. Results were analyzed using the Student’s t test and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: Groups C (parecoxib) and D (tramadol plus ketorolac) showed no significant difference (p = 0.129 and 0.13, respectively) vs. the group with no drug, although Group D showed a slight improvement. Group E showed a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.043). Conclusions: (1) The PIFIR model is useful to evaluate function in rats with induced neuropathic pain. No improvement was observed after parecoxib was administered. Although slight improvement was observed with tramadol plus ketorolac, it was not conclusive. Ketamine achieved a significant improvement


REFERENCES

  1. Melzack R, Wall FD. The Challenge of Pain. N. York, Babio Booko, 1983.

  2. Buendía J. Psicología clínica y salud. Aspectos psicológicos del dolor crónico. Capítulo 5, Universidad de Murcia, 1991

  3. Fordyce WE. Behavioral methods for Chronic Pain and Illnes. St. Louis, Mosby, 1976.

  4. Fordyce WE. Learning processes in pain. In: STERNBACK RA, The Psychology of Pain. N. York, Raven Press 1978.

  5. Keefe FS, Gil KM, Bose SC. Behavioral approaches in the multidisciplinary management of chronic pain: Programs and sieges. Clinical Psychology Review 1986;6:87-113.

  6. Roskier E, Lazarus RS. Doping theory and teaching of doping skills. In: Davison PO, Davison SM, Behavioral Medicine: changing Health Lifestyles. N. York, Brunner/Mazel; 1980.

  7. Weisenberg M. Psychological intervention for the control of Pain. Behaviour Research Therapy 1987;24(2):301-312.

  8. Bandura A. Self-efficacy an uniying bodily sensations. Annals of Internal Medicine 1977;91:62-70.

  9. www.psiquiatría.com.

  10. Blumer D, Helibronn M. Chronic pain as a variant of depressive disease. The painprone disorder. Journal Nervous Metal Disease 1982;170:381-406.

  11. Lefebvre J, Keefe F. Memory for Pain: The relationship of pain catastrophizing to the recall of daily rheumatoid arthritis pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2002;18:56-63.

  12. Beck AT. Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders. N. York, International Universities Press 1976.

  13. Jensen M, Ehde D, Hoffman A, Patterson D, Czerniecki J, Robinson L. Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain 2002;95:133-142.

  14. Sullivan M, Rodgers W, Kirsch I. Catastrophizing, depression and expectancies of pain and emotional distress. Pain 2001;91:147-154.

  15. Romano JM, Turner JA. Chronic pain and depression: does the evidence support a relationship? Psychogical Bulletin 1985;97:19-35.

  16. Bistre S. Evaluación integral del paciente con dolor. En: Merck, Clínica del Dolor. Mc Graw Hill 2001.

  17. Calle AR. Ante la ansiedad: una propuesta para mantener la serenidad y evitar el estrés. Urano 1999:65-99.

  18. Boston K, Pearce SA, Richardson PH. The pain cognitions questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1990;34:103-109.

  19. Sullivan M, Bishop S, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524-532.

  20. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Cognitive factors and persist Pandora’s box. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1992;16:99-122.

  21. Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Riley JL. Pain, beliefs, coping, and adjustment to chronic pain. Pain Forum 1999;8:161-168.

  22. Keefe FJ, Lefebvre JC, Smith S. Coping research: avoiding conceptual errors and maintaining a balanced perspective. Pain Forum 1999;8:176-180.

  23. Keefe FJ, Brown GK, Wallston KA, Caldwell DS. Coping with rheumatoid arthritis: catastrophizing as a maladaptive strategy. Pain 1989;37:51-56.

  24. Macrodimitis SD, Endler NS. Coping, control, and adjustment in type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology 2001;20(3):208-216.

  25. Keefe FJ, Crisson J, Urban B, Williams D. Analyzing chronic low back pain: the relative contribution of pain coping strategies. Pain 1990;40:293-301.

  26. Sheehan DV, Sheehan-Harnett, Raj BA. The measurement of disability. In: Mental Health Status, Functioning, and disabilities measures. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1996;(suppl 3)11:89-95.

  27. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 1983;17:38-44.

  28. Keefe FJ, Caldwell DS, Queen KT. Gil KM, Martínez S, Crisson JE, Ogden W, Nunley J. Pain coping strategies in osteoarthritis patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1987;55:208-212.

  29. Gross AR. The effect of coping strategies on the relieve pain following surgical intervention for lower back pain. Psychosomatic Medicine 1986;48:229-241.

  30. Keefe FJ, Dolan E. Pain behavior and pain coping strategies in low back pain and myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome patients, Pain 1986;24:49-56.

  31. Reesor KA, Craig KD. Medically incongruent chronic back pain: physical limitations, suffering, and ineffective coping. Pain 1988;32:35-45.

  32. Turner JA, Clancy S. Strategies of coping with chronic low back pain: relationship to pain and disability. Pain 1986;24:355-364.

  33. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatric 1965;12:63-70.

  34. Toner J, Gurland B, Teresi J. Comparison of self-administered and rater-administered methods of assessing levels of severity of depression in elderly patients. J Gerontol 1988;43:136-140.

  35. Tanaka-Matsumi J, Kameoka VA. Reliabilities and concurrent validities of popular self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and social desirability. J Consult Clin Psychology 1986;54:328-333.

  36. Jegede RO. Psychometric properties of the self-rating depression scale. J Psychol 1976;93:27-30.

  37. Hedlund JL, Vieweg BW. The Zung Self-rating depression scale: a comprehensive review. J Operat Psychiatry 1979;10:51-64.

  38. Lambert MJ, Hatch DR, Kingston M. D. Zung, Beck and Hamilton Rating Scales as measures of treatment outcome: a meta-analytic comparison. J Consulting Clinical Psychologic 1986;54:54-59.

  39. Moran PW, Lambert MJ. A review of current assessment tools for monitoring changes in depression. In: Lambert MJ, Christensen ER, DeJulio SS. eds. The measurement of physicotherapy outcome in research and evaluation. New York: Wiley, 1983:263-303.

  40. Biggs JT, Wylie LT, Ziegler BE. Validity of the Zung Self-rating depression scale. Br J Psychiatry 1978;132:381-385.

  41. Spielberger CD, Urrutia AM, Gónzalez-Reigosa F, Guerrero DR. Inventario de ansiedad rasgo-estado. 1996.

  42. Asghari A, Nicholas MK. Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study. Pain 2001;94:85-100.

  43. Sullivan M, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite J, Keefe F, Martin M, Bradley L, Lefebvre J. Theorical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2001;17:52-64.

  44. Severeijns R, Vlaeyen JW, Van den Hout, Weber W. Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of level of physical impairment. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2001;17:165-172.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com