Letechipia J, Alessi A, Rodríguez G, Asbun J

Language: English
References: 41
Page: 70-78
PDF size: 218.09 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Purpose. To enhance bone healing through controlled interfragmentary movements, numerous experiments have been conducted in animal models employing external fixation devices to apply mechanical stimulation to the fracture site. However, the efficacy of these fixators has been questioned. On the other hand, intramedullary nailing is a widely established clinical practice for reducing closed tibial fractures. Material and methods. In an effort to enhance bone healing, to overcome the disadvantages of external fixators (i.e., non-uniform linear movement), and to enhance the advantages of intramedullary nailing (i.e., reduced risk of infection), an active intramedullary nail has been designed and fabricated. Active nail will provide controlled in-situ stimulation (simultaneously axial and shear) from a selectable acceleration (0.35 to 8.17g – axial and 0.44g to 10.46 g - shear), associated to a discreet set of high-frequency values (29.82 - 172.05 Hz - axial and 29.68 to 172.13 - shear). Results. Five active intramedullary nails were fabricated, capable of producing average acceleration between 0.35 and 10.4 g. Acceleration is applied simultaneously by all three axes (x, y, and z), resulting in axial and shear stimulation. For each acceleration level, there are a limited number of frequencies that can be selected. For each frequency, there are a limited number of acceleration levels that can be delivered. Bone morphology produces different levels of acceleration in each axe. Acceleration levels are controlled externally only by the variable power source (1.5V_DC to 6V_DC). Accelerated in-vitro testing showed that the life of the device exceeded the required active period. Mechanical test showed that in case of failure of the active component, the active intramedullary nail will act as a standard nail, allowing bone healing to continue its normal course. Ex vivo experiments were conducted inserting one active intramedullary nail in two intact adult sheep tibia. Results indicate that the strain induced by the active intramedullary nail (from 18.62 με to 38.13 με) has been reported to be osteogenic. Additional experiments are required in order to statistically validate the strain that can be induced in vivo by the active intramedullary nail. Also, in vivo experiments using simple fractures of the tibial shaft need to be conducted in order to assess orif effectively, applying active mechanical stimulation in situ enhances bone healing.

REFERENCES

1. Goodship AE, Kenwright J. The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67: 650-5.

2. Kenwright J, Richardson JB, Cunningham JL, White SH, Goodship AE, Adams MA, Magnussen PA, et al. Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomised trial of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 654-9.

3. Augat P, Simon U, Liedert A, Claes L. Mechanics and mechano- biology of fracture healing in normal and osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16(Suppl. 2): S36-S43.

4. Chao EY, Aro HT, Lewallen DG, Kelly PJ. The effect of rigidity on fracture healing in external fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989: 24-35.

5. Augat P, Merk J, Ignatius A, Margevicius K, Bauer G, Rosenbaum D, Claes L. Early, full weightbearing with flexible fixation delays fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 194-202.

6. Claes L. Measuring bone healing in osteosynthesis with external fixator using the Fraktometer FM 100. Chirurg 1991; 62: 354-5.

7. Duda GN, Mandruzzato F, Heller M, Goldhahn J, Moser R, Hehli M, Claes L, et al. Mechanical boundary conditions of fracture healing: borderline indications in the treatment of unreamed tibial nailing. J Biomech 2001; 34: 639-50.

8. Gardner TN, Evans M, Hardy J, Kenwright J. Dynamic interfragmentary motion in fractures during routine patient activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 216-25.

9. Goodship AE. Mechanical stimulus to bone. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 4-6.

10. Augat P, Merk J, Wolf S, Claes L. Mechanical stimulation by external application of cyclic tensile strains does not effectively enhance bone healing. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15: 54-60.

11. Claes L, Wolf S, Augat P. Mechanical modification of callus healing. Chirurg 2000; 71: 989-94.

12. Goodship AE, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J. Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; S105-S115.

13. Hente R, Fuchtmeier B, Schlegel U, Ernstberger A, Perren SM. The influence of cyclic compression and distraction on the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 709-15.

14. Matsushita T, Kurokawa T. Comparison of cyclic compression, cyclic distraction and rigid fixation. Bone healing in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69: 95-8.

15. Wolf S, Augat P, Eckert-Hubner K, Laule A, Krischak GD, Claes LE. Effects of high-frequency, low-magnitude mechanical stimulus on bone healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 192-8.

16. Wolf S, Janousek A, Pfeil J, Veith W, Haas F, Duda G, Claes L. The effects of external mechanical stimulation on the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies fixed by flexible external fixation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1998; 13: 359-64.

17. Howard CB, Simkin A, Tiran Y, Porat S, Segal D, Mattan Y. Do axial dynamic fixators really produce axial dynamization? Injury 1999; 30: 25-30.

18. Claes LE, Wilke HJ, Augat P, Rubenacker S, Margevicius KJ. Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1995; 10: 227-34.

19. Bedi A, Le TT, Karunakar MA. Surgical treatment of nonarticular distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14: 406-16.

20. Bone LB, Sucato D, Stegemann PM, Rohrbacher BJ. Displaced isolated fractures of the tibial shaft treated with either a cast or intramedullary nailing. An outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 1336-41.

21. Court-Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM. Closed intramedullary tibial nailing. Its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 605-11.

22. Hooper GJ, Keddell RG, Penny ID. Conservative management or closed nailing for tibial shaft fractures. A randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 83-5.

23. Schmidt AH, Finkemeier CG, Tornetta P, 3rd. Treatment of closed tibial fractures. Instr Course Lect 2003; 52: 607-22.

24. Alho A, Ekeland A, Stromsoe K, Folleras G, Thoresen BO. Locked intramedullary nailing for displaced tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 805-9.

25. Finkemeier CG, Schmidt AH, Kyle RF, Templeman DC, Varecka TF. A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14: 187-93.

26. International Standard ISO 10993-1:2003 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing; 3rd Ed; 2003; ISO; Switzerland, Geneva.

27. International Standard; ISO 15142-1 Implants for surgery-Metal intramedullary nailing systems-Part 1: Intramedullary nails; First edition; 2003; ISO; Switzerland, Geneva.

28. ASTM F1264-03 Standard Specification and Test Methods for Intramedullary Fixation Devices; First edition; AStm international; 2006; West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

29. Hwang SJ, Lublinsky S, Seo YK, Kim IS, Judex S. Extremely small-magnitude accelerations enhance bone regeneration: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 1083-91.

30. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, Mallinckrodt C, McLeod K. Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature 2001; 412: 603-4.

31. Rubin C, Turner AS, Mallinckrodt C, Jerome C, McLeod K, Bain S. Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the highfrequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone. Bone 2002; 30: 445-52.

32. Kershaw CJ, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J. Tibial external fixation, weight bearing, and fracture movement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993: 28-36.

33. IEC 60601-1 International Standard, Medical Electrical Equipment –Part 1: General Requirements For Basic Safety And Essential Performance; Edition 3.1 2012-08 International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneve Switserland; 2012.

34. ReliaSoft Corporation, Accelerated Life Testing Reference, ReliaSoft Publishing, Tucson, AZ, 1998.

35. Goodship AE, Cunningham JL, Oganov V, Darling J, Miles AW, Owen GW. Bone loss during long term space flight is prevented by the application of a short term impulsive mechanical stimulus. Acta Astronaut 1998; 43: 65-75.

36. Klein P, Schell H, Streitparth F, Heller M, Kassi JP, Kandziora F, Bragulla H, et al. The initial phase of fracture healing is specifically sensitive to mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 662-9.

37. Kenwright J, Goodship AE. Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 36-47.

38. Matsushita T, Kurokawa T. Is axial loading a mechanical factor of stimulating bone healing? Combined Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Societies of USA, Japan and Canada; 1991; 1991, p. 286.

39. Claes L, Wilke HJ, Rubenacker S. Interfragmentary strain and bone healing-an experimental study. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1989; 1989, p. 568.

40. Fritton SP, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains. J Biomech 2000; 33: 317-25.

41. Gardner TN, Mishra S. The biomechanical environment of a bone fracture and its influence upon the morphology of healing. Med Eng Phys 2003; 25: 455-64.