2014, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Med MD 2014; 5.6 (1)
Spatial and temporal fluctuation observational study of Aedes aegypti in the metropolitan area of Guadalajara, Mexico
Candelario-Mejía G, Rodríguez-Rivas A, Muñoz-Urias A, González-Carcamo J, Candelario-Valencia A, Mosso-González C, Duran-Ferman P, Jareth-Marco CB, Cruz-Bastida JS, Ramírez-García SA
Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page: 6-12
PDF size: 674.91 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction.
One of the main emerging diseases in the Mexico is the Dengue fever, mosquito-borne genus
Aedes aegypti. The most important challenges
in the public health policies is knowing the biological and molecular bases of the disease; there is a support through ecological studies in the
populations. The transmitter vector of the virus dengue may present spatial and temporal variations, this sort of studies are in Mexico. To
estimate the spatial and temporal fluctuations of the Aedes Aegypti, during 2011 and 2012; within the metropolitan area in Guadalajara
and considering the abiotic local variables such as abundance as a response variable and the locations, months, years, temperature, relative
humidity, as well as rainfall.
Material y Methods.
A descriptive observational study. 8 Locations were sampled with immature Aedes aegypti, through the method of ovitraps which were
distributed in 4 municipalities of Guadalajara. From 5 of these places (San Rafael, Agua Azul, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Ssalud,
Federalismo and Monterrey), the first one is considered domestic (adjacent to the address), the second and third considered non domestic, but
with the variable presence and transit of people; the last two considered per domestic (distant from the nearest house, Federalismo 22.1 m. and
Monterrey 26.56 m. All of them located in Guadalajara. Also, the municipality of Tonala (Peridomestic 201.13 m.) and La Estancia in the
municipality of Zapopan (31.68 m) The results were validated by the statistical tests with the program GLIM 3.77.
Results.
. Between May and September of 2011 and 2012, there were significant heterogeneity in average abundance of immature by ovitrap
(p
‹2.2e-16) regarding the location, month and year. As well as significant interactions (p
‹2.2e-16) amongst location: month/location/year;
month/year and location/month/year, in matters of abundance. The highest amounts of
Aedes aegypti abundance, were shown in
housings: San Rafael (52.41) and Tlaquepaque (31.18), in which abundance was reduced at peridomestic level from the nearest housing as
follows: Federalismo 23.10 m (1.59), Monterrey 26.56 m. (1.37), La Estancia 31.68 m. (0.73) and La Solidaridad 201.13 m. (0). During the
12 consecutive months the distribution in abundance of immature in the vector was highest in May (30.98); December, January and February
had (0) presence. In March there were the first records (4.73). The mean temperature during the hottest period (May-September, 17.7
°C) was the
local variable with greater deviation (0.0647 p
‹2e-16).
Discussion.
This is the first western study in Mexico presenting the Spatial and temporal variation of
Aedes aegypti.
REFERENCES
1.Mora C, Jiménez VA, Treviño AF, Maritza S. Distribución geoespacial y detección del virus del dengue en mosquitos Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti de Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México. Salud Pública de México 2010; 52(2): 127-133.
2.-Guzmán MG, Kourí G. Dengue diagnosis, advances and challenges. Int J Infect Dis 2004; 8: 69-80.
3.-Kindhauser MK. Dengue y fiebre hemorrágica dengue. En: Defensa Global ante la amenaza de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Organización Mundial de la Salud (Eds), Ginebra, 2003, pp140-3.
4.-García C, García L. Abundancia y distribución de Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev Biol Trop 2011; 59 (4): 1609-1619.
5.-OPS. Number of reported cases of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic, fever (DHF), region of the Americas (by country and subregion). En línea: http://www.paho.org/english/hcp/hctvbd//dengue -cases-2002 [Revisado 2013 nov 26]
6.-Kouri G. El dengue, un problema creciente de salud en las Américas. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2006;19(3):143-5.
7.-Ramírez ZM, Velasco MH, Ramos C, Peñuelas JE, Maradiaga CM, Murillo LJ, et al. Caracterización clínica y epidemiológica de los casos de dengue: experiencia del Hospital General de Culiacán, Sinaloa, México. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2009;25:16- 23.
8.-Cenavece. Programa de acción especifico 2007-2012 dengue. [En línea] http://www.cenave.gob.mx/progaccion/dengue.pdf . [Revisado: junio 2013].
9.-Kerr JA, Camargo SD, Abedi ZH. Erradicación of Aedes aegypti in Latinoamérica. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1964; 24:276-82.
10.-Prevención y Control del Dengue en las Américas. En: Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud (Eds). Memorias 27.a Conferencia Sanitaria Panamericana Sesión del Comité Regional Resolución CSP27.R15. Washington, D.C.,2007, pp 59.A.
11.-Gubler DJ. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: its history and resurgence as a global public health problem. En: Gubler DJ, Kuno G (Eds). Dengue and dengue hemor rhagic fever. New York: Cab International; 1997. pp. 1–22.
12.-Cruz PC, Sebrango CR, Cristo HM, Pina C, Marquetti M del C, Sánchez LV. Comportamiento estacional y temporal de Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) en Sancti Spíritus, 1999-2007. Rev Cubana Med Trop 2010; 62(1): 5-10.
13.-Amaya CA. El Ecosistema Urbano: Simbiosis Espacial entre lo Natural y lo Artificial. Rev For Lat 2005; 1-16.
14.-Marquetti M del C, Bisset J, Suárez S, Pérez O, Leyva M. Bebederos de animales: depósitos a tener en cuenta por el Programa de Control de Aedes aegypti en áreas urbanas de Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop 2006; 58(1): 40-43.
15.-Hoyos RA, Rodríguez PA. Actualización en aspectos epidemiológicos y clínicos del dengue. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública 2010; 36(1)149-164. 16.-Cunha SP, Carreira JR, Lima M, Duarte JR, de Barros CV, L da Silva J, et al. Presença de Aedes aegypti em Bromeliaceae e depósitos com plantas no Município do Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Rev Saúde Pública 2002; 36(2):244-245.
17.-Marquetti M del C, Bisset J, Leyva M, García A, Rodríguez M. Comportamiento estacional y temporal de Aedes aegypti y Aedes albopictus en La Habana, Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop 2008; 60(1): 62-67
18.-Pozo E, Neyra C, Vílchez ME, Méndez M. Factores asociados a la infestación intradomiciliaria por Aedes aegypti en el distrito de Tambogrande, Piura 2004. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública 2007; 24(2): 144-151.
19.-Sánchez CR, Torres ZR, Segovia SF, Reyes VF, Alvarado MM, Fernández SI (2010). Localización De Criaderos No-Residenciales De Aedes Aegypti Y Su Asociación Con Casos De Dengue En La Zona Metropolitana De Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición, 2011;11(1).
20.-Marquetti MC, Carús F, Aguilera L, Navarro A. Influencia de factores abióticos sobre la incidencia de Aedes aegypti en el Municipio 10 de Octubre, 1982–1992. Rev Cub Med Trop. 1995;47(2):131–35.
21.-Calosi P, Bilton DT, Spicer JI. Thermal tolerance, acclimatory capacity and vulnerability to global climate change. Biol Lett 2008; 4(1): 99-102.
22.-Schoof HF. Mating, Resting Habits and Dispersal of Aedes aegypti. Bull Wld Hlth Org 1967; 36: 600-601.
23.-Rodhain F, Rosen L. Mosquito vectors and dengue virus-vector relationships. En: Gubler Dj. Kuno G (Eds). Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever, Cambridge. 1997. Ed. University Press; pp. 45-61.
24.-Bergerot B, Merckx T, Van Dyck H, Baguette M. Habitat fragmentation impacts mobility in a common and widespread woodland butterfly: do sexes respond differently?. BMC ecology 2012; 12(1):5.
25.-NOM-032-SSA2-2002. Norma Oficial Mexicana para la vigilancia epidemiológica, prevención y control de enfermedades transmitidas por vector. 2002. Ed. SSA. México.
26.- Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e informática (INEGI). Disponible en: http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/inform acion/jal/territorio/clima.aspx. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, 2010 (INEGI).
27.-Laurence B. Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods MW Service. 2nd ed. 1993.Essex: Elsevier Science Publishers.
28.-Stein M, Griselda IO, Walter RA, Willener JA. Fluctuación estacional de Aedes aegypti en Chaco, Argentina. Rev Saúde Pública 2005; 39(4): 559-564.
29.-Vezzani D, Velázquez SM, Schweigmann N. Seasonal pattern of abundance of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Buenos Aires city, Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo 2004; 99(4): 351-356.
30 . - Ibáñez BS, Martínez CC. Clave para la identificación de larvas de mosquitos comunes en las áreas urbanas y suburbanas de la República Mexicana. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 1994; 92:43- 73.
31.-Crawley M J. GLIM for Ecologists. 1993. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford.
32.-Royal Statistical Society. 1985. GLIM 3.77. Royal Statistical Society. London, England
33.-Carbajo E, Gómez S, Curto S. Variación espaciotemporal del riesgo de transmisión de dengue en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Medicina (B. Aires) 2004; 64(3):231-234.
34.-Barrera R, Delgado N, Jiménez M. Estratificación de una ciudad hiperendémica en dengue hemorrágico. Pan Am J Public Health 2000; 8(4):225- 233.
35.-Tinker ME; Olano VA. Ecología del Aedes aegypti en un pueblo de Colombia, Sur América / Aedes aegypti's ecology in a little town in Colombia, South America. Biomédica (Bogotá) 1993;13(1):5-14
36.-Jacob B G, Regens JL, Mbogo CM. Occurrence and distribution of Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) larval habitats on land cover change sites in urban Kisumu and urban Malindi, Kenya. J Med Entomol 2003;40(6):777-84
37.-Leisnham PT, Lester PJ, Slaney DP. Anthropogenic Landscape change and vectors in New Zealand: effects of shade and nutrient level on mosquito productivity. Eco-Health 2004; 1: 306-316.
38.-Melic A. Entomología urbana. Bol SEA 1997; 20: 293-300.
39.-Troyes L, Villegas BZ, Troyes RM. Expansión del Aedes aegypti a localidades rurales de Cajamarca. Rev Perú Med Exp. Salud Publica 2006: 23(3): 163-167.
40.- de La Guardia S, Mederos JL, Cepero RI, Hidalgo MC, Valdés GL. Organización y acciones contra el Aedes aegypti en una comunidad. Rev Cub Med Mil 2003;32 (4).
41.-Soto-Acosta R, Mosso C, Cervantes-Salazar M, Puerta-Guardo H, Medina F, Favari L, et al.The increase in cholesterol levels at early stages after dengue virus infection correlates with an augment in LDL particle uptake and HMG-CoA reductase activity. Virology 2013;442(2):132-47.
42.-Puerta-Guardo H, Mosso C, Medina F, Liprandi F, Ludert JE, del Angel RM. Antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection in U937 cells requires cholesterol-rich membrane microdomains. J Gen Virol 2010;91(Pt 2):394-403.
43.-Mosso C, Galván-Mendoza IJ, Ludert JE, del Angel RM. Endocytic pathway followed by dengue virus to infect the mosquito cell line C6/36 HT. Virology 378:193-199. 2008.