medigraphic.com
ISSN 2305-7939 (Electronic)

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

RCU 2014; 3 (1)

Resultados de la pieloplastia laparoscópica en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso

González LT, Algarín VE, Suárez MME, Bautista OJ, Rodríguez-Ojea GL, Hernández CJL

Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page: 27-37
PDF size: 707.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pyeloureteral obstruction is the restriction of urine flow from the renal pelvis to the ureter, causing pyelocaliceal dilation that if not treated evolves into progressive deterioration of renal function. It is known as Pyeloureteral Junction Syndrome (PJS). The treatment is surgical and the Anderson-Hynes dismembered technique has shown the best results. It has been described through laparoscopic approach. Objetives: To show the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, its feasibility and its success rate. Methods: A descriptive and longitudinal study was made of 31 patients with PJS treated at the National Center of Minimal Invasive Surgery (NCMIS) Centro Nacional de Cirugía por Mínimo Acceso (CNCMA) between July 1st 2010 and January 31st 2014 with the purpose of describing its results. Demographic variables were considered which assess the technique and its feasibility. A transperitoneal approach was carried out, anastomosis with intracorporeal discontinue suture and pelvis remodeling with continuous suture and a JJ catheter was placed retrogradely. Results: The male sex, the right side, the extrinsic cause were predominant. The technique was 100% feasible. The assessing variables of the results of the surgical technique corresponded to what has been described by other authors. There were no transoperative complications, 29 % postoperative; three grade IIIb and one grade IVa according to Clavein-Dindo Classification. In 93,5 % the technique was successful. Conclusions: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty at the (CNCMA) is a feasible alternative of treatment for PJS adult patients, with an acceptable success rate and morbility.


REFERENCES

  1. J.S Wolf. Percutaneous approaches to the upper urinary tract collecting system. En: Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin A W, Peters C A. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10ma ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. 1326-57.

  2. Curcio L, Ahouagi A C, Renteria J, Araujo Igor R, Presto D. Laparoscopic approach to ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a bifid pelvis. Int Braz J Urol. 2013. 39 (3): 438-39.

  3. Sameh W, Elgebaly OF. Laparoscopic transposition pyelo-pyelostomy for repair of adult uretero-pelvic junction obstruction secondary to lower pole crossing vessels: A Novel technique. J Endourol. 2012;26(4):377-80. [Pubmed].

  4. Park J M. Development of the genitourinary tracts. En: Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10ma ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. 2975-3001.

  5. Tanagho EA, McAninch JW, Amend WJ Jr, Andersson KE, Barbour S, Baskin Laurence S et al. Smith's General Urology.17 Edition. San Francisco: The McGraw-Hill Ed. 2008.

  6. Stephen N, Hedican S, Anderson J, Ankem M, Gaurav B. Essential Urologic Laparoscopy: The Complete Clinical Guide. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1822.

  7. Escobar F, Arbeláez S, Correa JJ, Gaviria F, Bonilla A, Ramírez LF. Experiencia en pieloplastia laparoscópica. Instituto de Cirugía Mínimamente invasiva. Congreso Medellín-Colombia. 2005.

  8. Mitropoulos D, Artibarni W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 2012; 61 (2):341-9.

  9. Rivas JG, Gregorio SA, Eastmond MA, Gómez AT, Ledo JC, Togores LH, Barthel JJ. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Cent European J Urol. 2013; 66(3):361-6. [Pubmed].

  10. Kojima Y, Umemoto Y, Mizuno K, Tosawa K, Kohuri, K; Hayashi Y. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults and children: lessons learned. J. Urol. 2011:185(4) 1461-7. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  11. Fernández A, Carreño J, González R, Menéndez A, Albelo Y, Fedor Cruz O. Pieloplastia laparoscópica. Experiencia inicial. Rev Cub Urol. 2012: 1(1):84-94.

  12. Zhu H, Shen C, Li X, Xiao X, Chen X, Zhang Q et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve. Urol Int. 2013;90(2): 130-5. [Pubmed]

  13. García-Aparicio L, Tarrado X, Rodo J, Krauel L, Olivares M, Rovira J et al. Laparoscopìc pyeloplasty in pediatric patients. Our initial cases and lessons learned. Actas Urol Esp. 2010 May; 34(5): 473-6. [Pubmed]

  14. Juliano RV, Mendonça RR, Meyer F, Rubinstein M, Lasmar MT, Korkes F et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Jun; 21(5):399-403. [Pubmed].

  15. Komiakov BK, Guliev BG, Aliev RV. Laparoscopic plasty in primary stricture of pyeloureteral segment. Urologiia. 2013 Nov-Dec; (6):81-4. [Pubmed]

  16. Castillo OA, Vitagliano G, Alvarez JM, Pinto I, Toblli J. Transmesocolic pyeloplasty: experience of a single center. J Endourol. 2007 Apr; 21(4):415-8. [Pubmed]

  17. Minnillo,JB, Cruz SJ, Zayao A, Passerotti RC. Long-term experience and autcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2011; 185(4): 1455-60. [Pubmed]

  18. Naitoh Y, Kawauchi A, Kamoi K, Soh J, Hongo F, Okihara K et al. Nephrolithotomy performed concurrently with laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology. 2014 Jan; 83(1): 243-6. [Pubmed]

  19. Kijvikai K. The role of laparoscopic surgery for renal calculi management. Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Feb; 3(1): 13-8. [Pubmed]

  20. Kagantsov IM, Minin AE, Sannikov IA. Features of drainage of pyelocaliceal system in children after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urologiia 2013 Nov-Dec;(6):85-9. [Pubmed]

  21. Gamarra M, Ibarluzea G, Gallego JA, Camargo I, Pereira JG, Astobieta A, et al. Nuevo posicionamiento para realizar la pieloplastia laparoscópica: Nuestra experiencia. Arch. Esp. UroL. 2007; 60(5):565-8. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es.

  22. Gamarra M, Ibarluzea G, Gallego JA, Camargo I, Pereira JG, Astobieta A, et al. Nuevo posicionamiento para realizar la pieloplastia laparoscópica: Nuestra experiencia. Arch. Esp. UroL. 2007; 60(5):565-8. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es.

  23. Rogers A, Hasan T. Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction. Indian J Urol 2013; 29 (4): 294-302.

  24. Shahnawaz, Shahzad A, Shahzad I, Baloch MU. Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Jan; 30(1):153-6. [Pubmed]

  25. Zoeller C, Lacher M, Ure B, Petersen C, Kuebler JF. Double j or transrenal transanastomotic stent in laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: a comparative study and our technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Mar; 24(3): 205-9. [Pubmed]

  26. De la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV et al. Categorisation of Complications and Validation of the Clavien Score for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Euro uro .2012: 62(2): 246 - 55. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.

  27. Palmero JL, Nuño de la Rosa I, Miralles J, Amorós A, Pastor JC, Amorós B. Estudio predictivo para complicaciones tras nefrolitotomía percutánea ajustado la clasificación Clavien. Actas Urol Esp. 2013: 37(7): 412-18

  28. Szydelko T, Urbañczyk G, Litarski A, Panek W, Pupka A. The usefulness of the polymeric "double J" catheter in ureteropelvic junction stenting after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Polim Med. 2012; 42(1):45-8. [Pubmed]

  29. González T. Cirugía lumboscópica de la litiasis del uréter lumbar. BVS [Internet]. 2012.

  30. Vitagliano G, Castilla R, Fernández Long JG. Relaparoscopy in the treatment of complications after laparoscopic urological procedures. Arch Esp Urol. 2013 Mar; 66(2): 215-20. [Pubmed]

  31. Szydelko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznañski W, Tupikowski K, Pupka A, Janczak D, Zdrojowy R. Clavien classification of complications after 150 laparoscopic pyeloplasties. Urology. 2011 Jun; 77(6):1359-64. [Pubmed]

  32. Wu Y, Dong Q, Han P, Liu L, Wang L, Wei Q. Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Sep; 22(7): 658-62. [Pubmed]

  33. Rais-Bahrami S, Rizkala ER, Cadeddu JA, Tugcu V, Derweesh IH, Abdel-Karim AM et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: outcomes of an international multi-institutional study of 140 patients. Urology. 2013 Aug; 82(2):366-72. [Pubmed]




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com