2005, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2005; 6 (2)
Viability of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three ports in the management of the acute cholecystitis
Shiordia PFJ, Ugalde VF, Vicencio TA, Quiroz MG, Liceaga FA, López MMC
Language: Spanish
References: 40
Page: 79-85
PDF size: 61.77 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Three ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not demonstrated more risk than the four ports.
Aims: Compare laparoscopic management in acute and chronic cholecystitis.
Material and methods: 325 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three ports were studied (Hospital Santelena). All were divided into two groups,
(GA) n = 114, acute cholecystitis; and
(GC) n = 211, chronic cholecystitis. Age, sex, time of surgery, hospital stay and technical resources were determined. Student’s test and fisher’s exact test were performed.
Results: Time of surgery resulted shorter in
GC, p ‹ 0.0001. Gallbladder puncture, four ports convertion was less en
GC, p ‹ 0.0001. 42 ERCP but no difference was found in neither group. 4 cases of pulmonary athelectasia and no local complications resulted in any case. Mortality was zero.
Conclusions: Female patients have acute and chronic cholecystitis more frequently than male patients. Time of surgery, gallbladder puncture and four ports convertion is more likely to occur in acute than in chronic cholecystitis. We support the fact that both, acute and chronic cholecystitis can be managed by laparoscopic technique with three ports. This technique is safe, effective. The resources of gallbladder puncture, four port or abdominal convertion are invaluable to support this technique.
REFERENCES
Quintana JM, Cabriada J, Aróstegui I. Health-Related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 110-118.
Nilsson E, Ros A. Rahmqvist. Cholecystectomy: costs and health-related quality of life: a comparison of two techniques. Int J Qual Life Care 2004; 16: 473-482.
Cameron DR, Goodman AJ. Delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis: re-admissions and outcomes. Ann Royal College Surg on England 2004; 86: 358-362.
Contini S, Corradi D, Busi N. Can gangrenous cholecystitis be prevented? J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 710-716.
Jacobs S. Future of laparoscopy. J Uro 2004; 172: 2127.
Trichak S. Three-port vs four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1434-6.
Leggett PL, Bisel CD, Churchman-Winn R, Ahn C. Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients. Surg Endos 2001; 15: 293-6.
Shoa JA, Healy MJ, Berlin BS. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Ann of Surg 1996; 224: 609-620.
Ros AG, Lennart K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus Mini-Laparotomy cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, single blinded study. Ann of Surg 1996; 224: 609-620.
Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D, Rukavina A. Treatment of acute cholecystitis. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 398-401.
Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. J Surg Br 2005; 92: 44-49.
Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P, Kivilaakso E. Randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. ACP J Club 1998; 129: 7.
Syrakos T, Antonitsis P, Zacharakis E, Takis A, Manousari A, Bakogiannis K. Small-incision (minilaparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004; 389: 171-7.
Lazar F, Duta CB. Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cirugía 2001; 96: 269-76.
Bakken IJ, Skjeldestad FE, Mjaland O, Jonson E. Cholecystectomy in Norway 1990-2002. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004; 124: 2376-8.
Al-Raymoony A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Jordan. East Mediterr Health J 2001; 7: 838.40.
Kakizoe S, Kakizoe Y, Guntani A, Kabashima A, Kakizoe H, Sadamatsu K. Personal experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 934-6.
Mejewski WD, Sulikowski T, Kaminski M, Ostrowski M. Reversed 5 pattern of diagnostic laparoscopy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its standardization. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004; 14: 226-9.
Majewski J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 747-50.
Gutierrez RL, Grau CLM, Pulido MM, Padilla MF. Laparoscopy. Experience en 307 cases. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 1990; 55:191-4.
Gutierrez RL, Grau CLM, Rojas MA, Avalos CR, Alcaraz HG. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Report of 60 cases. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 1991; 56: 175-8.
Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 32-6.
Endo S, Souda S, Nezu R, Yoshikawa Y, Hashimoto J. A new method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using three trocars combined with suture retraction of gallbladder. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001; 11: 85-8.
Dieter RA Jr. Three port vs standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2004; 17: 18772-74.
Kang KJ, Lim TJ. Tip for microlaparoscopic cholecistectomy: easy removal of the gallbladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the three pot technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13:118-120.
Tagaya N, Kita J, Takagi K, Imada T, Ishikawa K, Kogure H. Experience with three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1998;5: 309-11.
El-Dhuwaib Y, Hamade AM, Issa ME, Balbisi BM, Abid G, Ammori BJ. An “all 5-mm ports” selective approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy and anti-reflux surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004; 14: 141-4.
Rifki JS, Lakhloufi A, Hidraoui K, Khaiz D, Chehab F, Bouzidi A. Situations of conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: series of 300 cholecystectomies. Tunis Med 2004; 82: 344-9.
Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 188: 205-11.
Habib FA, Kolachalam RB, Khilnani R, Preventza O, Mittal VK. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous colecistitis. Am J Surg 2001; 18: 71-5.
Bove A, Bongarzoni G, Serafín FM, Bonomo L, Dragan G, Palone F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: predictors of conversion to open cholecystectomy and preliminary results. G Chir 2004; 25: 75-9.
Ferrozi L, Lippolis G, Petitti T, Carnevale D, Masi M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: our experience. G Chir 2004; 25: 80-2.
Collins Ch, Maguire D, Fitzgerald IA. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Natural history of choledocolithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 28-33.
Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, Iswariah H, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 2004; 18: 475-81.
Sarli L, Pietra N, Franze A, Colla G, Costi R, Gobbi S, Trivelli M. Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 200-8.
Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L. Preoperative endoscopio sphyncterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience. World J Surg 2003; 27: 180-6.
Lakatos L, Simon L, Mester G, Reti G, Nagy A, Lakatos PL. Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopio retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of 7-year, retrospective, single center study. Orv Hetil 2004; 145: 1553-9.
Sees DW, Martin RR. Comparison of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative management of gallstone pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 719-22.
Ros A, Haglund B, Nilsson E. Reintervention after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in Sweden 1987-1995: analysis of data from a hospital discharge register. Eur J Surg 2000; 168: 695-700.
Terlecki A, Kutwin L, Jablonski S, Sapiezko J. Analysis of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the basis of our thirteen years of experience. Pol Merkuriuse Lek 2004; 17(Suppl 1): 98-100.