medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2013, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2013; 36 (6)

La especialización hemisférica y la regulación de la conducta motora desde la perspectiva de la neurociencia cognitiva

Machado S, Arias-Carrión Ó, Orellana CAV, Lattari E, Cardoso SA, Egídio NA

Language: Spanish
References: 99
Page: 513-520
PDF size: 210.81 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction Our understanding of functional brain organization is due to advances in neuroimaging technologies and intensive clinical research. Recently, cognitive science (cognitive neuroscience), combined with advances in technology, have changed our understanding of brainbehavior relationship. This symbiotic relationship has allowed a better characterization of the lesion site in patients with brain disorders and patterns of activation in healthy subjects.
Objective In this article we discuss the contribution of the left hemisphere and right hemisphere involvement in the regulation of motor behavior; this will allow us to better understand the lateralization of motor functions.
Development The results support the view of a left hemisphere dominance for language and motor control, and a right hemisphere dominance for spatial functions and attention. Specialized areas are probably predetermined and certain functions are lateralized to one or other hemisphere due to the efficient organization and information processing in the brain.
Conclusion In the studies reviewed, specific functions for each hemisphere were observed, suggesting the existence of a complex organization that recruits several areas of the Nervous System for proper task performance.


REFERENCES

  1. Haaland KY. Left hemisphere dominance for movement. Clin Neuropsychol 2006;20:609-622.

  2. Matthews PM, Adcock J, Chen Y, Fu S et al. Towards understanding language organization in the brain using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2003;18:239-247.

  3. Serrien DJ, Brown P. The functional role of interhemispheric synchronization in the control of bimanual tasks. Exp Brain Res 2002;147:268-272.

  4. Serrien DJ, Cassidy MJ, Brown P. The importence of the dominant hemisphere in the organization of bimanual movements. Hum Brain Mapp 2003;18:296-305.

  5. Serrien DJ, Fisher RJ, Brown P. Transient increases of synchronized neural activity during movement preparation: influence of cognitive constraints. Exp Brain Res 2003;153:27-34.

  6. Serrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP. The missing link between action and cognition. Prog Neurobiol 2007;82:95-107.

  7. Friston KJ. Models of brain function in neuroimaging. Ann Rev Psychol 2005;56:57-87.

  8. Joanette Y, Ansaldo AI, Kahlaoui K, Côté H et al. Impacto de las lesiones del hemisferio derecho sobre las habilidades lingüísticas: perspectivas teórica y clínica. Rev Neurol 2008;46:481-488.

  9. Goble DJ, Brown SH. The biological and behavioral basis of upper limb asymmetries in sensorimotor performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008;32:598-610.

  10. Voets NL, Adcock JE, Flitney DE, Behrens TE et al. Distinct right frontal lobe activation in language processing following left hemisphere injury. Brain 2006;129:754-766.

  11. Isaacs KL, Barr WB, Nelson PK, Devinsky O. Degree of handedness and cerebral dominance. Neurology 2006;66:1855-1858.

  12. Sveller C, Briellmann RS, Saling MM, Lillywhite L et al. Relationship between language lateralization and handedness in left-hemispheric partial epilepsy. Neurology 2006;67:1813-1817.

  13. Homae F, Watanabe H, Nakano T, Taga G. Prosodic processing in the developing brain. Neurosci Res 2007;59:29-39.

  14. Pannekamp A, Weber C, Friederici AD. Prosodic processing at the sentence level in infants. Neuroreport 2006;17:675-178.

  15. Vernooij MW, Smits M, Wielopolski PA, Houston GC et al. Fiber density asymmetry of the arcuate fasciculus in relation to functional hemispheric language lateralization in both right- and left-handed healthy subjects: a combined fMRI and DTI study. Neuroimage 2007;35:1064-1076.

  16. Pascual A, Huang KL, Neveu J, Préat T. Neuroanatomy: brain asymmetry and long-term memory. Nature 2004;427:605-606.

  17. Hatta T. Handedness and the brain: a review of brain-imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007;6:99-112.

  18. Skipper JI, Goldin-Meadow S, Nusbaum HC, Small SL. Speech-associated gestures, Broca’s area, and the human mirror system. Brain Lang 2007;101:260-277.

  19. Lausberg H, Zaidel E, Cruz RF, Ptito A. Speech-independent production of communicative gestures: evidence from patients with complete callosal disconnection. Neuropsychologia 2007;45:3092-3104.

  20. Roy AC, Craighero L, Fabbri-Destro M, Fadiga L. Phonological and lexical motor facilitation during speech listening: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Physiol Paris 2008;102:101-105.

  21. Watkins K, Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca’s area. J Cogn Neurosci 2004;16:978-987.

  22. Hauk O, Jonhsrude I, Pulvermüller F. Somatotopic representation of action words in the motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 2004;41:301-307.

  23. Pulvermüller F, Hauk O, Nilkulin VV, Limoniemi RJ. Functional links between motor and language systems. Eur J Neurosci 2005;21:793-797.

  24. Fabbri-Destro M, Rizzolatti G. Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda) 2008;23:171-179.

  25. Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M, Cattaneo L. Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2009;5:24-34.

  26. Binkofski F, Buccino G. Motor functions of the Broca’s region. Brain Lang 2004;89:362-369.

  27. Dominey PF, Hoen M, Blanc, JM, Lelekov-Boissard T. Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies. Brain Lang 2003;86:207-225.

  28. Dominey PF, Inui T, Hoen M. Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing. Brain Lang 2008;109:80-92.

  29. McGeoch PD, Ramachandran VS. Apraxia, metaphor and mirror neurons. Med Hypotheses 2007;69:1165–1168.

  30. Harrington DL, Haaland KY. Hemispheric specialization for motor sequencing: Abnormalities in levels of programming. Neuropsychologia 1991;29:147–163.

  31. Kimura D. Left-hemisphere control of oral and brachial movements and their relation to communication. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 1982;298:135–149.

  32. Harrington DL, Rao SC, Haaland KY, Bobholz JA et al. Specialized neural systems underlying representation of sequential movements. J Cogn Neurosci 2000;12:56–77.

  33. Amunts K, Schleicher A, Zilles, K. Cytoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex-more than localization. Neuroimage 2007;37:1061-1065.

  34. Hammond G. Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2002;26:285-92.

  35. Gross RG, Grossman M. Update on apraxia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2008;8:490-496.

  36. Haaland KY, Elsinger CL, Mayer AR, Durgerian S et al. Motor sequence complexity and performing hand produce differential patterns of hemispheric lateralization. J Cogn Neurosci 2004;16:621-636.

  37. Haaland KY, Prestopnick JL, Knigth RT, Lee RR. Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain 2004;127:1145-1158.

  38. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain 2007;130:2146-2158.

  39. Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR et al. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke 2009;40:545-550.

  40. Vines BW, Nair D, Schlaug G. Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated. Eur J Neurosci 2008;28:1667-1673.

  41. Guye M, Bartolomei F, Ranjeva JP. Imaging structural and functional connectivity: towards a unified definition of human brain organization? Curr Opin Neurol 2008;21:393-403.

  42. Müller-Dahlhaus JF, Orekhov Y, Liu Y, Ziemann U. Interindividual variability and age-dependency of motor cortical plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2008;187:467-475.

  43. Rushworth MF, Taylor PC. TMS in the parietal cortex: updating representations for attention and action. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:2700-2716.

  44. Carboni-Roman A, Del Rio Grande D, Capilla A, Maestu F et al. Bases neurobiológicas de las dificultades de aprendizaje. Rev Neurol 2006;42:S171-S175.

  45. Jax SA, Coslett HB. Disorders of the perceptual-motor system. Adv Exp Med Biol 2009;629:377-391.

  46. O’Shea J, Sebastian C, Boorman ED, Johansen-Berg H et al. Functional specificity of human premotor-motor cortical interactions during action selection. Eur J Neurosci 2007;26:2085-2095.

  47. Króliczak G, Frey SH. A Common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. Cereb Cortex 2009;19:2396-2410.

  48. Aramaki Y, Honda M, Sadato N. Suppression of the non-dominant motor cortex during bimanual symmetric finger movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 2006;141:2147-2153.

  49. Cincotta M, Ziemann U. Neurophysiology of unimanual motor control and mirror movements. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:744-762.

  50. Seitz RJ, Franz M, Azari NP. Value judgments and self-control of action: The role of the medial frontal cortex. Brain Res Rev 2009;60:368-378.

  51. Wu X, Chen K, Liu Y, Long Z et al. Ipsilateral brain deactivation specific to the nondominant hand during simple finger movements. Neuroreport 2008;19:483-486.

  52. Hickok G, Bellugi U, Klima ES. The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language. Nature 2002;381:699-702.

  53. Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:393-402.

  54. Martin JH, Friel KM, Salimi I, Chakrabarty S. Activity- and use-dependent plasticity of the developing corticospinal system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007;31:1125-1135.

  55. Mars RB, Piekema C, Coles MG, Hulstijn W et al. On the programming and reprogramming of actions. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:2972-2979.

  56. Machado S, Cunha M, Portella CE, Silva JG et al. Integration of cortical areas during performance of a catching ball task. Neurosci Lett 2008;446:7-10.

  57. Chase C, Seidler R. Degree of handedness affects intermanual transfer of skill learning. Exp Brain Res 2008;190:317-328.

  58. Rossini PM, Dal Forno G. Integrated technology for evaluation of brain function and neural plasticity. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Am 2004;15:263-306.

  59. Shabbott BA, Sainburg RL. Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization. J Neurophysiol 2008;100:565-575.

  60. Corballis PM. Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter. Brain Cogn 2003;53:171-176.

  61. Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulated contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 1999;354:1325-1346.

  62. Macaluso E, Cherubini A, Sabatini U. Bimanual passive movement: functional activation and inter-regional coupling. Front Integr Neurosci 2007;1:5.

  63. Machado S, Cunha M, Portella CE, Silva JG et al. Participación de la corteza parietooccipital en el proceso de integración sensoriomotora: estudio electroencefalográfico. Rev Neurol 2008;47:146-149.

  64. Verstynen TD, Dieedrichsen J, Albert N, Aparicio P et al. Ipsilateral motor cortex activity during unimanual hand movements relates to task complexity. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:1209-1222.

  65. Sainburg RL. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypotesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 2002;142:241-258.

  66. Sun FT, Miller LM, D’esposito M. Measuring temporal dynamics of functional networks using phases spectrum of MRI data. Neuroimage 2005;28:227-237.

  67. Halsband U, Lange RK. Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies. J Physiol Paris 2006;99:414-424.

  68. Goldberg E, Podell K, Loveli M. Lateralization of frontal lobe functions and cognitive novelty. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994;6:371-378.

  69. Himmelbach M, Karnath HQ. Goal-directed hand movements are not affected by the biasesd space representation in spatial neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:972-980.

  70. Debare F, Wenderoth N, Sunaert S, van Hecke P et al. Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination task. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:855-867.

  71. Rossini PM, Altamura C, Ferreri F, Melgari JM et al. Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:241-254.

  72. Esparza DY, Archambault PS, Winstein CJ, Levin MF. Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage. Exp Brain Res 2003;148:488-497.

  73. Johansen-Berg H, Matthews PM. Attention to movement modulates activity in sensorimotor areas, including primary motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 2007;142:13-24.

  74. Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A. Sensorimotor integration in movement disorders. Mov Disorders 2003;18:231-240.

  75. Zeuner KE, Molloy FM. Abnormal reorganization in focal hand dystonia- sensory and motor training programs to retrain cortical function. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:43-53.

  76. Werhahn KJ, Mortensen J, Van Boven RW, Zeuner KE et al. Enhanced tactile spatial acuity and cortical processing during acute hand deafferentation. Nat Neurosci 2002;5:936–938.

  77. Maki Y, Wong KF, Sugiura M, Ozaki T et al. Asymmetric control mechanisms of bimanual coordination: an application of directed connectivity analysis to kinematic and functional MRI data. Neuroimage 2008;42:1295-1304.

  78. Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Dambrosia J, Murase N et al. Kinematically specific interhemispheric inhibition operanting in the process of generation of a voluntary movement. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:588-593.

  79. De Gennaro L, Cristiani R, Bertini M, Curcio G et al. Handedness is mainly associated with an asymmetry of corticospinal excitability and not of transcallosal inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:1305-1312.

  80. Garvey MA, Mall V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:973-984.

  81. Derakhshan I. Laterality of motor control revisited: directionality of callosal traffic and its rehabilitative implications. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005;12:76-82

  82. Cardoso de Oliveira S, Gribova A, Donchin O, Bergman H et al. Neural interactions between motor cortical hemispheres during bimanual and unimanual arm movements. Eur J Neurosci 2001;14:1881-1896.

  83. Obhi SS, Goodale MA. Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing. J Neurophysiol 2005;94:1861-1868.

  84. Maslovat D, Carlsen AN, Ishimoto R, Chua R et al. Response preparation changes following practice of an asymmetrical bimanual movement. Exp Brain Res 2008;190:239-249.

  85. Sternad D, Wei K, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB. Intermanual interactions during initiation and production of rhythmic and discrete movements in individuals lacking a corpus callosum. Exp Brain Res 2007;176:559-574.

  86. Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodríguez E, Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:229-239.

  87. Sporns O, Chialvo DR, Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC. Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci 2004;8:418-425.

  88. Ioannides AA. Dynamic functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007;17:161-170.

  89. Brovelli A, Ding M, Ledberg A, Chen Y et al. Beta oscillations in a large- scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2004;101:9849-9854.

  90. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Bressler SL, Ding M. Response preparation and inhibition: the role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm. Neuroscience 2008;156:238-246.

  91. Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:474-480.

  92. Kranczioch C, Athanassiou S, Shen S, Gao G et al. Short-term learning of a visually guided power-grip task is associated with dynamic changes in EEG oscillatory activity. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:1419-1430.

  93. Hummel F, Gerloff C. Larger interregional synchrony is associated with greater behavioral success in a complex sensory integration task in humans. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:670-678.

  94. Andres FG, Mima T, Schulman AE, Dichgans J et al. Functional coupling of human cortical sensorimotor areas during bimanual skill acquisition. Brain 1999;122:855-870.

  95. Sarter M, Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT. Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience. Toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. Am Psychol 1996;51:13–21.

  96. Iacoboni M, Dapretto M. The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006;7:942-951.

  97. Bloom JS, Hynd GW. The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: excitation or inhibition? Neuropsychol Rev 2005;15:59-71.

  98. Gisiger T, Kerszberg M. From a representation of behavior to the concept of cognitive syntax: a theoretical framework. Prog Brain Res 2007;165:463-474.

  99. Iacoboni M, Zaidel E. Interhemispheric visuo-motor integration in humans: the role of the superior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:419-425.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com