medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular

2010, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Angiol 2010; 38 (2)

Experiencia quirúrgica (convencional y endovascular) en el tratamiento de la insuficiencia venosa superficial de miembros pélvicos y evaluación de cambios por ultrasonido Doppler dúplex en el sistema venoso a un año de su postoperatorio

Carrasco GH, Gutiérrez FJL, Zárraga RJL, Serrano LJA, Sánchez NN, Mijangos WF, González RMÁ, Carpio COG, Rojas GP, Vallejo BE

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 65-70
PDF size: 449.99 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the development of the patients, who were operated under great saphenous stripping versus endovenous ablation after one year of the procedure, with Doppler ultrasound and the description of sociodemographic features.
Background: Around 10 to 35% of the American population in the United States has some form of cronic venous disease. The venous ulcers affect approximately 4% of the population over 65 years old. Furthermore is a medical condition that affects 25 to 39% of the women, and 15 to 23% of the men.
Method: For this study, we collect some parameters like age, gender, pregnancies, body mass indexes, taking percentages, standard deviation, and average. We take notes about the symptoms remaining one year after the procedure, determined percentages, and analizing with the Chi square test.
Results: Of the 91 patients treated for venous pathology from January to December of 2007, we treated 81 legs under conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein, and 26 legs under endovenous ablation. In the first group, 55% were women and 45% men, for the second group (endovascular ablation) 89% were women and 11% men.
Conclusion: The conventional stripping procedure continues to be the most common performed procedure for the treatment of venous pathology. The endovenous ablation procedure is another treatment option, and more studies are needed to define its efficacy.


REFERENCES

  1. Rutherford RB. Cirugía Vascular. 6a. Ed. Madrid, España: Elsevier; 2006, p. 2230-87.

  2. Zwiebels W. Doppler General. New York: Edit. Marvan, Elservier Inc,; 2008, p. 359-83.

  3. Campbell B. Nuevos tratamientos para venas varicosas. BMJ 2003; 324: 689-90.

  4. Rodríguez-Camero. Tratamiento endoluminal de las varices mediante radiofrecuencia VNUS-Closure. Angiología 2006; 58(Supl. 2): S25-S34.

  5. Weiss RA. Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency versus 810 nm diode láser occlusion of large veins in an animal model. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 56-61.

  6. Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Perälä J. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the cost. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 959-65.

  7. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (Closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVES study). J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 207-14.

  8. Dosick S, Gale. Chronic Venous insufficiency Due to great Saphenous Vei incompetence treated with radiofrequency Ablation: An effective and safe Procedure in the elderly. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 39: 341-5.

  9. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS. Prospective randomised study of endovenous. Radiofrequency obliteration (closure Procedure) versus ligation and Stripping in a selected. Patient population. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 207-14.

  10. 10 Mozes G, Manju Kalra. Extension of saphenous ttrombus into the vein: A potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 130-5.

  11. Vaz C, Matos A. Iatrogenic Arteriovenous Fistula Following Endovenous Láser Therapy of the short saphenous vein. Ann Vasc Surg 2008: 1-3.

  12. Shepherd EL. Aneurysmal dilatation of great saphenous vein stump after endovenous láser ablation. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 1037-9.

  13. Harold W. Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 601-5.

  14. Merchant R, Pichot O. Long term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 502-9.

  15. Almeida J. Radiofrequency ablation and láser ablation in the treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2006; 20: 547-52.

  16. Desmyttere J, Grard C. Endovenous 980.nm láser treatment of saphenous vein in a series of 500 patients. J Vasc Surg 2007: 46: 1242-7.

  17. Sharif M, Lee B. Role of endovenous Láser Treatment in the Management of Chronic Venous Insufficiency. Annals Vasc Surg 2007; 21: 551-5.

  18. Corcos L, Dini S. Duplex ultrasound changes in the great saphenous vein after endosaphenous láser occlusion with 808. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48:

  19. Sanjoy K, Fedor L. Recommended reporting standards for endovenous ablation for treatment of venous insufficiency, J Vasc Surg 2007; 46(3).

  20. BoEklof BR, et al. Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement, from the American Venous Forum, diciembre

  21. Callejas JM, Manasanch J. Hipertensión venosa de las extremidades inferiores. Anales de Cirugía Cardiaca y Vascular 2004; 9(5): 351-75.

  22. Negus D. Recurrent varicose veins: a national problem. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 823-4.

  23. Perrin M. Endoluminal treatment of lower limb varicose veins by endovenous láser and radiofrequency techniques. Phlebology 2004; 19: 170-8.

  24. Leopardi D. Systematic Review of treatments for varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2008: 1-13

  25. Rutges P, Kitslaar P. Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg 1993; 168: 311-5.

  26. 26 Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw JJ. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: Results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 442-5.

  27. Morrison C, Dalsing M. Signs and symptoms of saphenous nerve injury after greater saphenous vein stripping: Prevalence, severity, and relevance for modern practice. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 886-90.

  28. Porter JM, Moneta GL. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International Consensus Committe on Chronic Venous Disease. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 635-45.

  29. Fischer R, Chandler JG, De Maeseneer MG, Frings N, Lefebvre- Vilarbedo M, Earnshaw JJ, et al. The unresolved problem of recurrent saphenofemoral reflux. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195: 80-94.

  30. Van Rij AM, Jones GT, Hill GB, Hons BS, Ping J. Neovascularization and recurrent varicose veins: more histologic and ultrasound evidence. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 296-302.

  31. Nyamekye I, Shephard NA, Davies B, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. Clinicopathological evidence that +neovascularisation is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15: 412-5.

  32. dUNNc, Kabnick L. Endovascular Radiofrecuencia Obliteración using for treatment of Great Saphenous Vein. Ann Vasc Surg 2006: 20: 625-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com