medigraphic.com
Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiología

2002, Number 1

<< Back

Microbiología 2002; 44 (1)

Bioethics, bioweapons and the microbiologist

Anaya-Velázquez F

Language: English
References: 16
Page: 38-45
PDF size: 60.98 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The analysis of behavior of man in the field of biology is carried out through bioethics, considered the science of the survival. In the microbiology, there are numerous discoveries related with pathogenic microorganisms, including those that can be used as weapons in a biological war or in an attack considered bioterrorism. The scientist involved in microbiology can participate with his knowledge in the development and improvement of bioweapons, however from the point of view of bioethics it is not acceptable that he works in an investigation related with these topics, because the defense research can evolve in offensive one. The war is an antisurvival activity, therefore it is not acceptable. In the same way, the biological weapons composed with virus, fungi or alive bacteria, or with toxins from them, neither they are morally accepted. After the terrorist attacks with anthrax in the United States in 2001, the world scientific community in the field of microbiology should show against the use of the microorganisms like bioweapons, at the time of promoting the idea that the responsible use for the microorganisms is a moral imperative for all microbiologists around the world, since the biological weapons are a threat for the human life.


REFERENCES

  1. Anaya Velázquez, F. Bioética, guerra químico-biológica y desarrollo nuclear. 2002. En: Bioética General, Hernández Arriaga, J.L. (Ed.). Editorial El Manual Moderno, México, pp 395-404.

  2. Atiyah, M. Science for evil: the scientist’s dilemma. 1999. British Medical Journal 319:448-449.

  3. Block, S.M. The growing threat of biological weapons. 2001. American Scientist 89:28-37.

  4. Doyle, R. The American Terrorist. 2001. Scientific American. June. p. 17.

  5. Henderson,D.A. Bioterrorism as a public health threat. 1998. Emerging Infectious Diseases 4:488-492.

  6. Henderson, D.A. The looming threat of bioterrorism. 1999. Science 283:1279-1282.

  7. Henchal, E.A., Teska, J.D. y Ezzell, J.W. Responding to bioterrorism. 2000. Biotech Lab International, May-June. pp 14-15.

  8. Klietmann, W.F. and Ruoff, K.L. Bioterrorism: Implications for the clinical microbiologist. 2001. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 14:364-381.

  9. Lederberg, J. A clear and present threat to national security: military and civilian vulnerability to biological weapons.1998. In: Life Sciences and Health Challenges. Raymond, S.U. (Ed.). New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 139-144.

  10. MacLean, D. Ethics and biological defense research. 1992. In: The Microbiologist and Biological Defense Research. R.A. Zilinskas (Ed.), Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, vol 666, New York,. pp 100-112.

  11. Nelan, B.W. Germ warfare. 1997. Time, December. pp 30-33.

  12. Osterholm, M.T. Bioterrorism: a real modern threat. 2001. In: Emerging Infections 5, Scheld, W.M. and Hughes, J.M. (Eds.). ASM Press, Washington, pp. 213-222.

  13. Potter, V.R. Bioethics, the science of survival. 1970. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14:127-153.

  14. Rogers, P. Whitby, S. y Dando, M. Biological warfare against crops. 1999. Scientific American. June. pp 62-67.

  15. Several authors. National Symposium on Medical and Public Health Response to Bioterrorism. 1999. Emerging Infectious Diseases 5:491-565.

  16. Sidel, V.W. The role of physicians in the prevention of war. 1997. Memorias Primer Congreso Nacional de Bioética, México, pp 515-532.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com