medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2013; 27 (1)

Dislocation and necrosis of the first, second and third wedges. Management with the Masquelet technique. A case report

Rincón-Cardozo DF, Camacho-Casas JA, Reyes-Núñez VA

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 55-59
PDF size: 328.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The induced membrane technique was first described by Masquelet in 1986. It was initially used for the reconstruction of long bone shaft defects, particularly of the femur and tibia. The technique consists of two stages. During the first stage a membrane is induced to provide support to the grafts and supply growth factors that contribute to provide a favorable receiving bed for the future graft. During the second stage the poly-methyl-methacrylate spacer is removed and replaced with bone grafts, usually harvested from the iliac crest. Given that this technique has proven good results, it started to be used at other bone sites. We present herein the case of a patient with a large bone defect in the midfoot in whom the Masquelet technique was used with iliac crest grafts. Arthrodesis with a distal radius plate was performed to improve medial column stability, with favorable clinical and functional results.


REFERENCES

  1. Stafford PR, Norris BL: Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi-Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases. Injury 2010; 41(Suppl 2): S72-7.

  2. Giannoudis PV, Faour O, Goff T, Kanakaris N, Dimitriou R: Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 2011; 42(6): 591-8.

  3. Masquelet A, Begue T; The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin N Am 2010; 41: 27-37.

  4. Pelissier P, Bollecker V, Martin D, Baudet J: Foot reconstruction with the “bi-Masquelet” procedure. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2002; 47(4): 304-7.

  5. Largey A, Faline A, Hebrard W, Hamoui M, Canovas F: Management of massive traumatic compound defects of the foot. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95(4): 301-4.

  6. McCall T, Brokaw D, Jelen B, Scheid K, Scharfenberger A, Maar D, et al: Treatment of large segment al bone defects with reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft: technique and case series. Orthop Clin N Am 2010; 41: 63-73.

  7. Viateau V, Bensidhoum M, Guillemin G, Petite H, Hannouche D, Anagnostou F, Pelissier P: Use of the induced membrane technique for bone tissue engineering purposes: animal studies. Orthop Clin N Am 2010; 41: 49-56.

  8. Huffman LK, Harris JG, Suk M: Using the bi-Masquelet technique and reamer-irrigator-aspirator for post-traumatic foot reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30(9): 895-9.

  9. Taylor BC, French BG, Fowler TT, Russell J, Poka A: Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20(3): 142-50.

  10. Woon CY, Chong KW, Wong MK: Induced membranes-staged technique of bone-grafting for segmental bone loss: a report of two cases and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(1): 196-201.

  11. Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi F, Masquelet AC, French Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (SoFCOT): Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98(1): 97-102.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com