2009, Number 6
<< Back Next >>
Rev Invest Clin 2009; 61 (6)
Modification of the technique for subclavian-vein catheterization
Cantú-Martínez A, de-la-Garza-Castro O, Espinosa-Galindo AM, Cárdenas-Estrada E, de-la-Garza-Pineda O, Palacios-Ríos D, Guzmán-López S
Language: English
References: 25
Page: 476-481
PDF size: 291.50 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. In invasive monitoring, subclavian-vein puncture is a routine procedure indicated for central vein cathe-terization. It is indicated in patients according to hospital stay, including the administration of drugs and the treatment of chronic and cardiac disease. The techniques described to date include infraclavicular percutaneous puncture; others place catheters using angiographic methods, and the use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound has also been reported. Studies have been done in cadavers to get a better understanding of the procedure since the relationship between vascular elements and surrounding tissues are obtained. The usual technique is with the patient in Trendelenburg position, with the arm in adduction, the placement of an interscapular roll, and the head turned away from the puncture site.
Objective. The aim of this study was to demonstrate less frequent technical failures and complications using a modification of the usual technique. We propose catheterization of the right subclavian vein with the patient in decubitus, without an interescapular roll, with the arm in abduction and using the distal third of the clavicle and the suprasternal notch as anatomical references.
Results. Two technical puncture failures and three complications occurred in a total of 42 patients with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0410) in frequency (11.9%) from that reported with the traditional technique (21.8%).
Conclusions. Greater efficacy with the technique modified by the authors was confirmed. Anatomical cadaver dissections showed a greater space between the right subclavian vein and the clavicle.
REFERENCES
Aubaniac R. L’injection intraveineuse vsous-clavicularie ; advantages et technique. Presse Med 1952; 60: 1456.
Spracklen FHM, Niesche F, Lord PW, Bettermann EMM. Percutaneous catheterization ok axillary vein. Cardiovasc Res 1967; 1: 297-300.
Ayiem EN. Percutaneous catheterization of axillary and proximal basilic vein. Anaesthesia 1977; 32: 753-9.
Gouin F, Martin C, Saux P. Central venous and pulmonary artery catheterization via axillary vein. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985; 81: 27-9.
Mogil RA, DeLaurentis DA, Rosemond GP: The infraclavicular venipuncture. Arch Surg 1967; 95: 320-4.
Nickalls RWD. A new percutaneous infraclavicular approach to axillary vein. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 151-4.
Taylor BL, Yellowlees I. Central venous cannulation using infraclavicular axillary vein. Anaesthesiology 1990; 72: 55-8.
Sandhu NS. Transpectoral Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization of the Axillary Vein: An Alternative to Standard Catheterization of the Subclavian Vein. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 183-7.
Galloway S, Bodenham A. Ultrasound imaging of the axillary vein-anatomical basis for central venous access. British Journal of Anesthesia 2003; 90: 589-95.
Fortune JB, Feustel P. Effect of patient position on size and location of the subclavian vein for percutaneous puncture. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 996-1000.
Reyes JM, Encinas CA, Da Rosa WG, Vallejos G. Consideraciones anatomicas sobre la venopuncion subclavia. Revista de Posgrado de la VIa Cátedra de Medicina 2007; 165: 1-5.
Bien-Keem T, Soo-Wan H, Martin HS. Anatomic basis of safe percutaneous subclavian venous catheterization. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care 2000; 48: 1.
Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, et al. Complications and failures of subclavian vein catheterizations. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1735-8.
Dawson B, Trapo R. Bioestadística Médica. México: Manual Moderno; 2005, p. 408. ISBN: 970-729-134-6.
Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Principles of Biostatistics. 2nd. Ed. USA: Duxbury; 2000. ISBN: 978-0-534-22902-3.
Sachs L. Angewandte Statistik. Anwndung statistischer Methoden. 4. Springer Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: 1978. ISBN 3-540-40555-0.
Cárdenas EE, Ríos BNI, Pérez ChF, Maldonado ME, Almazán SJA, Reyes MCE, Cárdenas ME. Programa matemático para cálculo de tamaño de la muestra, en ambiente Excel Microsoft ®. XXIII Congreso Nacional de Investigación Biomédica. Monterrey, México: Facultad de Medicina, U.A.N.L.; 2005, p. 27-29.10.
Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta radiologica 1953; 39: 368-76.
Aubaniac R. The subclavian vein puncture-advantages and technique. Nutrition 1990; 6: 139-41.
Haire WD, Lieberman RP. Defining the risk of subclavian vein catheterization [editorial]. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1769-70.
Rodriguez CJ, Bolanowski A, Patel K, Perdue P, Carter W, Lukish JR. Classical positioning decreases the cross-sectional area of the subclavian vein. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 135-7.
Kitagawa N, Oda M, Totoki T, Miyazaki N, Nagasawa I, Nakazono T, Tamai T, Morimoto M. Proper Shoulder Position for Subclavian Venipuncture. Anethesiology 2004; 101: 1306-12.
Moran SG, Peoples JB. The deltopectoral triangle as a landmark for percutaneous infraclavicular cannulation of the subclavian vein. Angiology1993; 44: 683-6.
von Goedecke A, Keller C, Moriggl B, Wenzel V, Bale R, Deibl M, Moser P, Lirk P. An anatomic landmark to simplify subclavian vein cannulation: the deltoid tuberosity. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 623-8.
MacDonnell JE, Perez H, Pitts SR, Zaki SA. Supraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization: modified landmarks for needle insertion. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 421-4.