Parra CA, Pérez-Lizaur AB

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 63-66
PDF size: 358.21 Kb.

ABSTRACT

To learn about the best use of the equations for prediction of basal energy expenditure, we compared the results of indirect calorimetry studies (IC) with 4 equations of common use in clinical practice: Harris Benedict (HB), Mifflin-St. Jeor (MSJ), FAO/WHO and Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 150 adult women who attended nutritional assessment in a University nutrition clinic. We divided into 3 equal groups by category of weight according to the body mass index (normal weight, overweight and obesity). The indirect calorimetry was made according to the recommended protocol. The results show a significant correlation between the 4 predictive equations of basal energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry; however, the equation of Institute of Medicine obtained a higher value in the correlation with CI values in the 3 groups of weight categories studied.

REFERENCES

1. Lee RD, Nieman DC. Nutritional assessment. 5th ed. USA, New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

2. World Health Organization. Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 724. Geneva: Switzerland: World Health Organization: Nieman, DC; 2003.

3. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.

4. Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of basal metabolism in man. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington; 1919. Publication 279.

5. Mifflin MD, St. Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 241-247.

6. 6. Johnson RE. Techniques for measuring gas exchange. In: Kinney JM. Assessment of energy metabolism in health and disease. Columbus Ross Laboratories; 1980: 32-62.