2012, Number 2
Next >>
Rev Endocrinol Nutr 2012; 20 (2)
A pilot study on the benefits of a video as an educational tool in patients with type 2 diabetes
Muñoz MSG, Lerman GI, Cuevas D, Aguilar SC, Velasco ML, Hernández JS, Gómez PFJ
Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 56-62
PDF size: 407.31 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To show an educational video to patients with type 2 diabetes and evaluate changes in diabetes knowledge, glycemic control and quality of life.
Methods: Twenty seven patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly selected. A medical history and laboratory studies were obtained and standardized questionnaires about diabetes knowledge, treatment adherence and quality of life were applied. Patients were invited to see the video and afterwards, the diabetes knowledge questionnaire was repeated. A similar evaluation and HbA
1c test were obtained 2 to 6 months later.
Results: Subjects were 55 ± 9 years old, had diabetes for 13 ± 8 years and the HbA
1c was 8.5 ± 2.0%. The diabetes knowledge test score in the first, second (immediately after the video) and third examination (2-6 months later) were 69 ± 17, 80 ± 17 and 77 ± 15 respectively (p ‹ 0.0001 compared with the first exam). A low baseline knowledge test score was the most significant variable to predict a good response in the following test. We observed an increase in blood glucose monitoring (59
versus 78%, p = 0.063) and a better score in the WHO Well-being index (55 ± 18
versus 63 ± 22, p = 0.014). The HbA
1c diminished in those patients that significantly improved their score in the diabetes knowledge test (8.8 ± 1.8% to 8.3 ± 1.6, p = 0.248).
Conclusions: Offering a video as an educational strategy to type 2 diabetic patients improves significantly their diabetes knowledge. The quality of life and glycemic control also improved but in a more discrete manner and particularly in patients with baseline poor diabetes knowledge.
REFERENCES
Barquera S, Tovar-Guzmán V, Campos-Nonato I, González-Villalpando C, Rivera-Dommarco J. Geography of diabetes mellitus in Mexico: an epidemiologic transition analaysis. Arch Med Res 2003; 34: 407-414.
Rull JA, Aguilar-Salinas C, Rojas R, Ríos-Torres JM, Gómez-Pérez FJ Olaiz G. Epidemiology of Type 2 diabetes in México. Arch Med Res 2005; 36: 188-196.
González-Villalpando C, López-Ridaura R, Campuzano JC, González-Villalpando ME. The status of diabetes care in Mexican population: Are we making a difference? Results of the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006. Salud Publica Mex 2010; 52: S36-S43.
Aguilar-Salinas CA, Velázquez Monroy O, Gómez-Pérez FJ, González Chávez A, Lara Esqueda A, Molina Cuevas V et al. Characteristics of the patients with type 2 diabetes in Mexico: results from a large population-based, nation-wide survey. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 2021-2026.
Larme AC, Pugh JA. Attitudes of primary care provider toward diabetes: barriers to guideline implementation. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1391-1396.
Skovlund SE, Peyrot M. The diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) program: a new approach to improving outcomes of diabetes care. Diabetes Spectrum 2005; 18: 136-142.
Kurtz SM. Adherence to diabetes regimens: Empirical status and clinical applications. Diabetes Educ 1990; 16: 50-56.
Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1159-1171.
Clement S. Diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 1204-1214.
Lerman GI. Adherence to treatment: the key for avoiding long term complications of diabetes. Arch Med Res 2005; 36: 300-306.
Lerman GI, López-Ponce A, Villa RA, Escobedo M, Caballero EA, Velasco ML et al. Estudio piloto de dos diferentes estrategias para reforzar conductas de autocuidado y la adherencia al tratamiento en pacientes de bajos recursos con diabetes tipo 2. Gac Med Mex 2009; 145: 15-19.
Williams JW, Mulrow CD, Kroen K, Khande R, Badgett RG, Onori D, Lee S. Case finding for depression in primary care. A randomized trial. Am J Med 1999; 106: 36-43.
Bennet-Johnson S. Methodological issues in diabetes research. Measuring adherence. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1658-1667.
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologist. Knowledge in Diabetes Survey, 1994.
Psychiatric Research Unit WHO Collaborating Center in Mental Health. Cuestionario de calidad de vida. OMS, 1999.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: S11-61.
Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). Final report. National Institutes of Health: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NIH Publication No. 02-5215; 2002.
World Health Organization. Report on Medication adherence. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
Hynes RB. Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: clinical implications. JAMA 2002; 288: 2880-2887.
Ary DW, Toobert D, Wilson W, Glagow RE. Patient perspective on factors contributing to non-adherence to diabetes regimen. Diabetes Care 1986; 9: 168-172.
McDonald HP. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA 2002; 288: 2868-2875.
Brown S, Duchin S, Villagomez E. Diabetes Education in a Mexican-American population: Pilot testing of a research-based videotape. Diabetes Educ 1992; 18: 47-51.
Gerber BS, Brodsky IG, Lawless KA, Smolin LI, Arozullah AM, Smith EV et al. Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1574-1580.
Fleming, C, Simmons D, Leakehe L, Voyle J. Ethnic differences in the perception of a video developed for a multiethnic diabetes prevention programme in South Auckland, New Zealand. Diabet Med 1995; 12: 701-770.
Dyson S, Beatty D, Matthews R. An assessment of lifestyle video education for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. The British Dietetic Association Ltd. 2010. J Hum Nutr Diet 2010; 23: 353-359.
Frosch DL, Uy V, Ochoa S, Mangiones CM. Evaluation of a behavior support intervention for patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 2011-2017.
Lerman I, Lozano L, Villa AR, Hernández-Jiménez S, Weinger K, Caballero AE et al. Psychosocial factors associated with poor diabetes self-care management in a specialized Center in Mexico City. Biomed Pharmacother 2004; 58: 566-570.
Wells KB, Serboourne C, Scoenbaum M, Duan N, Meredith L, Unutzer J. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000; 283: 212-220.