medigraphic.com
ISSN 1025-0255 (Electronic)

2012, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

AMC 2012; 16 (6)

Osteoarthritis of the knee and scales for assessment

Álvarez LA, García LY, López LG, López LM, Áreas SY, Ruiz DA

Language: Spanish
References: 51
Page: 1777-1790
PDF size: 204.76 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: gonarthrosis is a frequent disease nowadays due to the aging of the population and the need in this group of patients with better functional ability.
Objective: to deepen on the utility of evaluative scales in patients with gonarthrosis.
Method: this review used Medline, Hinari and Pubmed databases with more than 200 articles on the subject of which 51 were selected.
Development: the most commonly used scales in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee are discussed, which include the ones referred by the sick people. Moreover, it is mentioned to the usefulness of the Rasmussen´s quantitative scale, since it relates very important aspects of the disease that need assessment and evolution. The new classification proposed by the American Knee Society, where for the first time on a scale combined subjective and objective elements as are referenced in the last part of the investigation.
Conclusions: is vital the gradation of patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee to determine the results of both conservative and surgical treatment at short and long term; and thus designing effective strategies that respond to patients who suffer from this disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Baczyk G, Samborski P, Piescikowska J, Kmieciak M, Walkowiak I. Comparison functioning and quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Med Sci. 2007; 52 Suppl 1:55-9.

  2. Terwee CB, Bouwmeeester W, Elsland SL, Dekker J. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19: 620-33.

  3. Jette AM, McDonough CM, Ni P, Haley SM, Hambleton RK, Olarsch S, et al. A functional difficulty and functional pain instrument for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11(4):5-6.

  4. Stratford PW, Kennedy PT, Woodhouse LJ, Spadoni GF. Measurement properties of the WOMAC LK 3.1 pain scale. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007; 15: 266-272.

  5. Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Dhottar H, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Quantifying the pain experience in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Pain Res Manag. 2010; 15(4):224-8.

  6. Allen KD, Oddone EZ, Stock JL, Coffman CJ, Lindquist JH, Juntilla KA, et al. The Self-Management of OsteoArthritis in Veterans (SeMOA) Study: design and methodology. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008; 29(4):596-607.

  7. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003; 81:646-56.

  8. Bellamy N, Wilson C, Hendrikz J. Population-based normative values for the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index: part I. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 41(2):139-48.

  9. Mancuso CA, Ranawat AS, Meftah M, Koob TW, Ranawat CS. Properties of the patient administered questionnaires: new scales measuring physical and psychological symptoms of hip and knee disorders. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(4):575-582.

  10. Bond M, Davis A, Lohmander S, Hawker G. Responsiveness of the OARSI- OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and funtion measure. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 541-47.

  11. Hunter DJ, Zaim S, Mosher TJ. What semi quantitative scoring instruments for knee OA MRI should be use?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 1363-64.

  12. Goetz C, Ecosse E, Rat AC, Pouchot J, Coste J, Guillemin F. Measurement properties of the osteoarthritis of knee and hip quality of life OAKHQOL questionnaire: an item response theory analysis. Rheumatology. 2011; 50(3):500-5.

  13. Angst F, Ewert T, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. The factor subdimensions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) help to specify hip and knee osteoarthritis: a prospective evaluation and validation study. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32(7):1324-30.

  14. Max RG. Knee rating scales for clinical outcome. En: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL. The Adult Knee. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2003.p. 367-78.

  15. Smith HJ, Richardson JB, Tennart A. Modification and validation of the Lysholm Knee Scale to assess articular cartilage damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17: 53-8.

  16. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF 36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Amm Rheum Dis. 2012; 60: 834-40.

  17. Felson DT, Lynch J, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Niu J, McAlindon T, et al. Comparison of BLOKS and WORMS scoring systems part II. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18(11):1402-7.

  18. Folkesson J, Dam EB, Olsen OF, Karsdal MA, Pettersen PC, Christiansen C. Automatic quantification of local and global articular cartilage surface curvature: biomarkers for osteoarthritis?. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 59(6):1340-6.

  19. Ornetti P, Dougados M, Paternotte S, Logeart I, Gossec L. Validation of a numerical rating scale to assess functional impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis: comparison with the WOMAC function scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70(5):740-6.

  20. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S, Rocca B, Foti C, Roi GS. Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross cultural adapatation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 330-35.

  21. Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J. Cultural adapatation and validation of a German version of the Arthritis impact measurement scales. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007; 15: 1128-33.

  22. Seror R, Tubach F, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Dougados M, et al. Individualising the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function subscale: incorporating patient priorities for improvement to measure functional impairment in hip or knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67(4):494-9.

  23. Villanueva Ojeda I, del_Mar_Guzman M, Javier Toyos F, Ariza-Ariza R, Navarro F. Relative efficiency and validity properties of a visual analogue vs a categorical scaled version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004; 12(3):225-31.

  24. Rodriguez Merchan EC. Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012; 13(1):1-6.

  25. Schein JR, Kosinski MR, Janagap-Benson C, Gajria K, Lin P, Freedman JD. Functionality and health-status benefits associated with reduction of osteoarthritis pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008; 24(5):1255-65.

  26. Ware JE, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): I Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Med Care. 1999; 37(5):40-50.

  27. Turner-Bowker DM, Saris-Baglama RN, Derosa MA, Giovannetti ER, Jensen RE, Wu AW. A computerized adaptive version of the SF-36 is feasible for clinic and Internet administration in adults with HIV. AIDS Care. 2012; 24(7):886-96.

  28. Hoivik ML, Moum B, Solberg IC, Cvancarova M, Hoie O, Vatn MH, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis after a 10-year disease course: Results from the IBSEN study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(8):1540-9.

  29. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Hawker GA, Roos EM, Maillefert JF, et al. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17(7):843-7.

  30. Goncalves RS, Cabri J, Ferreira PL, Gil J. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Portuquese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score- physical function short form (KOOS-PS). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 372-76.

  31. Salavati M, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Ebrahimiam MR, Ebrahimi I, et al. Validation of a Persian version of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in Iranians with knee. Injuries. 2008; 16(10): 1178-82.

  32. Rasmussen PS, Sorensen SE. Tibial condylar fractures: non-operative treatment of lateral compression fractures without impairment of knee-joint stability. Injury. 1973; 4(3):265-71.

  33. Rasmussen PS. Tibial condylar fractures as a cause of degenerative arthritis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1972; 43(6):566-75.

  34. Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Blonna D, Assom M, Castoldi F. Prospective follow-up of a simple arthroscopic-assisted technique for lateral tibial plateau fractures: results at 5 years. Knee. 2008; 15(5):378-83.

  35. Shen C, Ma J, Chen XD, Dai LY. The use of beta-TCP in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(12):1406-11.

  36. El-Alfy B, Othman A, Mansour E. Indirect reduction and hybrid external fixation in management of comminuted tibial plateau fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011; 77(3):349-54.

  37. Xu B, Xu HG. Arthroscope combined with minimally invasive internal fixation for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2008; 21(6):447-9.

  38. Fitzgerald GK, Piva SR, Irrgang JJ. Reports of joint instability in knee osteoarthritis: its prevalence and relationship to physical function. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51(6):941-6.

  39. Yakhdani HR, Bafghi HA, Meijer OG, Bruijn SM, van_den_Dikkenberg N, Stibbe AB. Stability and variability of knee kinematics during gait in knee osteoarthritis before and after replacement surgery. Clin Biomech. 2010; 25(3):230-6.

  40. Heijink A, Gomoll AH, Madry H, Drobnic M, Filardo G, Espregueira-Mendes J, et al. Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(3):423-35.

  41. Miura H, Takasugi S, Kawano T, Manabe T, Iwamoto Y. Varus-valgus laxity correlates with pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee. 2009; 16(1):30-2.

  42. Kean CO, Birmingham TB, Garland SJ, Bryant DM, Giffin JR. Minimal detectable change in quadriceps strength and voluntary muscle activation in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91(9):1447-51.

  43. Segal NA, Glass NA. Is quadriceps muscle weakness a risk factor for incident or progressive knee osteoarthritis?. Phys Sportsmed. 2011; 39(4):44-50.

  44. Shakoor MA, Rahman MS, Azad AK, Islam MS. Effects of isometric quadriceps muscle strengthening exercise on chronic osteoarthritis of the knee. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2010; 36(1):20-2.

  45. Singh RG. Patient and physician satisfaction with rofecoxib in osteoarthritis: results of the EVA survey. Medical Research. 2001; 17(2): 81-8.

  46. Nuñez Cornejo CP, Moya Velázquez J, Vázquez Arce MI. El pasó en la rodilla. Rev Sociedad Valenciana de Reumatología. 2008; 2(5): 17-0.

  47. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 248:13-14.

  48. Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(1): 3-19.

  49. Sihvonen R, Jarvela T, Aho H, Jarvinen TL. Validation of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with degenerative meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(10):1-8.

  50. Englund M. The role of the meniscus in osteoarthritis genesis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008; 34: 573-9.

  51. Kirkley A, Griffin S, Whelan D. The development and validation of a quality of life measurement tool for patients with meniscal pathology: the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool. Clin J Sport Med. 2007; 17: 349-56.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com