Yunes ZJLM, Duarte OA, Barrios RA, Gutiérrez PM, Posada TI

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 100-112
PDF size: 100.30 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The growth during the first half of life can be affected in various ways according to the type of nursing received.
Objective: To assess the growth and body composition of the infant in the first six months of life, of agreement three types of milk: A) formula (FS-1) early satiety. B) A conventional formula —formula of first stage— (LMP-1). C) Exclusive breast fed (SME).
Material and methods: Newly included infants older than 35 weeks of gestation and more than 2,500 grams. Monthly full anthropometry and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were evaluated.
Results: On the one hand were evaluated 228 infants who initially had mixed lactations with formula and breast fed (117 with LMP SM, 94 with FS1 SM and 17 with EMS), and that ended up taking only formula. No significant differences in weight gain, height, or perimeters, head and arm in the follow-up were found every month. Nor in the body composition taken a month and six months. Independently analyzed 52 infants who received exclusively FS1 (18), PML (17) or EMS (17) from birth and throughout the first six months. The growth in weight, height and arm and cephalic perimeter was similar. The fat body was significantly reduced in the group only powered FS1. Children who took SME had higher levels of body fat mass at the end of the first half.
Discussion: FS1 feeding during the first six months of age limits deposits of fat body when administered exclusively. This reduction of body fat compartment at this early stage of life is not clear if this is harmful or beneficial. Requires an assessment of neurological, cognitive and visual development of infants fed with this special formula.

REFERENCES

1. Rivera JA, Shamah T. Análisis crítico de la evolución de la mala nutrición durante las últimas décadas en México: resultados de niños. Salud Pública Mex 2007; 49(Supl 1): 267-269.

2. Weiss R, Dziura J, Burgert TS, Tamborlane WV, Taksali SE, Yeckel CW et al. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 236-274.

3. Kroke A. Desarrollo prenatal y postnatal de la obesidad: ensayos de prevención primaria y estudios de observación. Nestlé Nutrición Workshop Series. 2006; 57: 7-9.

4. Márquez-Aguirre MP, Magaña-Ortega P, Aguilar-Zinser JV. El primer año de la vida; ruta hacia la prevención de la obesidad. Nutr Clin 2007; 10(Suppl): S30-S41.

5. Guo SS, Chumlea WC. Tracking of body mass index in children in relation to overweigth in adulthood. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 70: S145-S148.

6. Freedman DS, Khan K, Sesdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Relation of Childhood BMI to adult adiposity: The Bogalusa Hearth Study. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 22-27.

7. Heller-Rouassant S. Obesidad en la infancia y adolescencia: factores de riesgo. Nutr Clin 2007; 10(Suppl): S53-S58.

8. Pietrobelli A. Fetal programming – early nutrition – later outcome. Nutr Clin 2007; 10(Suppl): S13-S18.

9. Salsberry PJ, Reagan PB, Dynamics of early childhood overweight. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1329-38.

10. Rasmussen F, Johansson M. The relation of weight, length and ponderal index at birth to body mass index and overweight among 18 year-old males in Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol 1998; 14: 373-380.

11. Martínez-Salgado H. Influencia de la nutrición en el primer año de la vida en el desarrollo del sobrepeso y la obesidad en edades posteriores. Nutr Clin 2007; (Suppl)10: S19-S29.

12. von Kries R, Koletzco B, Sauerwald T. Breast-feeding and obesity: cross sectional study. BMJ 1999; 319: 147-150.

13. Webber LS, Srinivasan SR, Wattigney WA et al. Tracking of serum lipids and lipoproteins from childhood to adulthood. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 884-899.

14. Kiess W, Galler A, Reich A. Clinical aspects of obesity in childhood and adolescence. Obes Rev 2001; 2: 29-36.

15. Hernández AMT. Alimentación complementaria. En: AEPap ed. Curso de Actualización Pediatría 2006. Madrid: Exlibris Ediciones; 2006: 249-256.

16. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.

17. Dewey KG. Nutrition, growth and complementary feeding of the breastfed infant. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48: 87-104.

18. WHO, De Onís M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Martorell R, Guest Editors. WHO Child Growth Standards. Acta Paediatr 2006; 95 (Suppl 450): S1-104.

19. Tojo R, Leis R, Pavón P. Leche Humana y Fórmulas Infantiles: Comparación Nutricional. Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) Inet Kas Nutri Pediat 2002.

20. Aggett P, Agostini C, Goulet O et al. The nutritional and safety assessment of breast milk substitutes and other dietary products for infants: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastr Nutr 2001; 32: 256-258.

21. Moreno VJM, Galiano SMJ. Recientes avances en fórmulas infantiles. Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria 2006; 8 (Supl 1): S37-49.

22. Weaver LT. Improving infant milk formulas: near the end of the trail for the Holy Grail? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003; 36: 307-310.

23. Dorca J. Ingredientes funcionales en las fórmulas infantiles. Encuentro con expertos Bol Pediatr 2008; 48: 347-352.

24. Sewell MF, Huston-Presley L, Super DM, Catalano P. Increased neonatal fat mass, not lean body mass, is associated with maternal obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1100-1103.