Ávila EG, Valero A, Macías-Garcia C

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 83-89
PDF size: 92.31 Kb.

ABSTRACT

A central issue in sexual selection theory is to understand why there are female preferences for males displaying ornaments. One theory proposes that displaying male secondary sexual characters is costly, and that this reveals information about the male´s phenotypic quality. Here, we used the viviparous Xenoophorus captivus (Goodeidae), a fish whose males often remove the bottom sediments during courtship (substrate sweeping), to test the hypothesis that male courtship displays expose males to parasitic infection, and thus may convey relevant information on the quality of a mating partner. First, we evaluated the females preference for males that perform more and longer courtship displays. Then, we exposed courting males to the presence of ectoparasites while manipulating their opportunity to perform substrate sweeping. We found that males that were allowed to sweep the substrate became infected and, as a consequence, interrupted their displays and began scratching, resulting in shorter courtship bouts in comparison to males prevented from sweeping the substrate. Thus, the occurrence of substrate sweeping in this species allows females to determine whether a male is infected with skin parasites through assessing the length of his courtship bouts.

REFERENCES

1. Andersson, M.B. Sexual Selection (Princeton University Press,1994). 624 págs.

2. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., McNamara, J.M. & Houston, A.I. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269,1331-1340 (2002).

3. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M.D. & Morley, J. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270, 653-664 (2003).

4. Fisher, R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Dover, 1985). 298 págs.

5. Ryan, M.J. & Keddy-Hector, A. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139, 35-35 (1992).

6. Kirkpatrick, M. Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Female Choice. Evolution 36, 1-12 (1982).

7. Zahavi, A. The cost of honesty (Further remarks on the handicap principle). J. Theor. Biol. 67, 603-605 (1977).

8. Andersson, M. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. Linn. Soc. 17, 375-393 (1982).

9. Hamilton, W.D. & Zuk, M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218, 384-387 (1982).

10. Pomiankowski, N.A. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 5, 136-184 (1988).

11. Arellano-Aguilar, O. & Macías García, C. Exposure to pesticides impairs the expression of fish ornaments reducing the availability of attractive males. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 275, 1343-1350 (2008).

12. Matthews, I.M., Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. Male Display Rate Reveals Ejaculate Characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 264, 695-700 (1997).

13. Velando, A., Beamonte-Barrientos, R. & Torres, R. Pigment-based skin colour in the blue-footed booby: an honest signal of current condition used by females to adjust reproductive investment. Oecologia 149, 535-542 (2006).

14. Williams, G.C. Adaptation and Natural Selection. A critique of some current evolutionary thought (Princeton University Press, 1966). 320 págs.

15. West-Eberhard, M.J. Developmental plasticity and evolution (Oxford University Press, 2003). 816 págs.

16. López, S. Acquired Resistance Affects Male Sexual Display and Female Choice in Guppies. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 265, 717-723 (1998).

17. Macías García, C. & Ramírez, E. Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals. Nature 434, 501-505 (2005).

18. Macías García, C. & Valero, A. Context-dependent sexual mimicry in the viviparous fish Girardinichthys multiradiatus. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 13, 331-339 (2001).

19. Altman, J. Observational study of behavior. Sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227-267 (1974).

20. Johnson, A.K. Ichthyophthiriasis in a recirculating closed-water hatchery. Progress Fish. Cultur. 23, 79-82 (1961).

21. NOM-ECOL-059-1994 Norma Oficial Mexicana. Que determina las especies y Subespecies de Flora y Fauna Silvestres Terrestres y Acuáticas en Peligro de Extinción, Amenazadas, Raras y las Sujetas a Protección Especial y que Establece Especificaciones para su Protección. Diario Oficial de la Federación 31 de diciembre de 2010.

22. Macías-García, C. & Saborio, E. Sperm Competition in a Viviparous Fish. Environ. Biol. Fishes 70, 211-217 (2004).

23. Farr, J.A. Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae): an experimental study of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 74, 38-91 (1980).

24. Kennedy, C.E.J., Endler, J.A., Poynton, S.L. & McMinn, H. Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 291-295 (1987).

25. Kodric-Brown, A. & Nicoletto, P. Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): the interaction between male color and display. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, 346-351(2001).

26. McMinn, H. Effects of the Nematode Parasite Camallanus cotti on Sexual and Non-Sexual Behaviors in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am. Zool. 30, 245-249 (1990).

27. Nicoletto, P.F. Female sexual response to condition-dependent ornaments in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 46, 441-450 (1993).

28. Houde, A.E. & Torio, A.J. Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies Behav. Ecol. 3,346-351 (1992).

29. Rushbrook, B.J. & Barber, I. Nesting, courtship and kidney hypertrophy in Schistocephalus-infected male three-spined stickleback from an upland lake. J. Fish Biol. 69, 870-882 (2006).

30. Pélabon, C., et al. Do microsporidian parasites affect courtship in two-spotted gobies? Mar. Biol. 148, 189-196 (2005).

31. Loehle, C. The pathogen transmission avoidance theory of sexual selection. Ecol. Model. 103, 231-250 (1997).