medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-779X (Electronic)
ISSN 2007-6452 (Print)

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Investigación en Discapacidad 2012; 1 (1)

The impact of PACS-INR system on the quality of radiology service

Gutiérrez MJ, Núñez GMA, Delgado ERE

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 18-24
PDF size: 46.98 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Today, there is a high demand for imaging studies, so it is necessary to implement methods of quality assurance in radiology departments to ensure that resources have an optimal impact on health and welfare of the population. However, to date few methods have included the impact of medical technology on the quality of health services, and assessments have focused on measuring mortality, disease duration, wait times and coverage. The strategy for evaluating the quality of health services focused on clinical and epidemiological criteria is not enough. In this paper, we propose a methodology to assess the quality of radiology service through structure and process indicators based on the dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency, continuity, productivity and security. When the technology is the most appropriate; the radiological diagnosis is accurate, well-timed and offers new opportunities to impact in the efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of health services in the benefit-risk balance.


REFERENCES

  1. Andriole K, Morina R, Arenson R, Carrinob J, Ericksonc B et al. Transforming the radiological interpretation process: The SCAR TRIPTM initiative. Proc SPIE 2004; 5371: 1-7.

  2. Fleita I, Caspani C, Borrás C, Plazas M, Miranda A, Brandan ME et al. La calidad de los servicios de radiología en cinco países latinoamericanos. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2006; 20 (2): 113-124.

  3. Strickland N. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and digital radiology en: Grainger & Allinson’s diagnostic radiology: A textbook of medical imaging. Churchill Livingstone Inc. 4th edition, 2001.

  4. Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Nicoli F, Modigliani G, Botti A, Bertolini M. A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: Quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. Journal of Digit Imaging 2007; 20 (2): 140-148.

  5. Scalzi G, Sostman H, Seshadri S, Matherly R. The New York hospital’s institution-wide PACS. Kodak Digital Science. Eastman Kodak Company 1997; 1: 2-16.

  6. Ortiz M, García J, Lemus C. A guideline for using PACS in countries receptive to technology. Proceedings of the 29th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference 2007: 23-26.

  7. Donabedian A. La calidad de la atención médica. La Prensa Médica Mexicana, México, D.F.1984.

  8. Noumeir R. Reporting workflow modeling. Proc. SPIE 2004; 5371: 8-15.

  9. Centro Nacional de Rehabilitación. Manual de garantía de calidad en radiodiagnóstico. Documento No. IPR032/02. 2002: 1-14.

  10. Ruelas E. Calidad, productividad y costos. Salud Pública México. 1993; 35 (3): 298-304.

  11. De la Fuente JR, Narro J, Santos JI, Pérez G, Tapia R et al. La medición en salud a través de indicadores. Siglo XXI Editores, México, D.F. 2001.

  12. Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. HarperCollins Publishers Inc, New York 2003: 184.

  13. Salinas-Martínez A. Technical efficiency in primary care for patients with diabetes. Salud Pública México, documento: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342009000100010&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es [Visita 31/01/2012].




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com