Elizaldi-Lozano N, Insfrán-Sánchez M, Cobos-Aguilar H

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 439-444
PDF size: 39.71 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to compare a three steps (3S) vs. two steps (2S) active participative promoting strategies (APPS) in critical reading of research papers in first degree residents.
Methods: an APPS educational intervention in 3S vs. 2S was developed. Two groups by simple random technique were study. The experimental group (A) with 13 residents and a control group (B) with 12. Three indicators were use (interpretation, judgement and proposal). The instrument had 120 items. In both groups, the educational strategies used were similar in contents. In-group A (3S) the subgroup discussion was emphasized. Group discussion and the resolution of extra classroom item guides performed was similar in both groups. Non parametric statistical tests were performed by a blind researcher.
Results: the reliability of the instrument was 0.89 by Kuder-Richardson procedure. The initial results were very low and showed an increase in the median in both groups. More students in-group A were located out of a random category. In both groups, Mc Nemar test results were significant.
Conclusions: the 3S strategy is better than 2S in developing critical reading in research papers.

REFERENCES

1. Zusuki-Lugo J. Nuevos paradigmas de la lectoescritura e instrumentos de evolución constructivista. V Congreso Internacional Educación para el Talento de la Niñez. Octubre 2001, Mazatlán Sinaloa, México.

2. Viniegra-Velázquez L. El camino de la crítica y la educación. Rev Invest Clin 1996;48:139-58.

3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, McMaster University Health Science Center. How to read clinical journals: I. to read and how to start reading them critically. Why Can Med Assoc J 1981;124 (5):555-558.

4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, Mc Master University Health Science Center. How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124(6):703-710

5. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, Mc Master University Health Science Center. How to read clinical journals: III. To learn the clinical course and prognosis of disease. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124(7):867-872.

6. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, Mc Master University Health Science Center. How to read clinical journals: V. To distinguish uselful from useless or even harmful therapy. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124(9):1156-1162.

7. Sakett DL, Rosenberg W, Muir JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996:312:71-72.

8. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence based medicine. A New approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992; 268:420-425.

9. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyau GH. User guides to the medical literature. I. How to get to started. JAMA 1993;270:2093-2095.

10. Viniegra-Velázquez L. Una nueva estrategia para la educación médica de posgrado .II Rev Invest Clin 1990;42:152-156.

11. Elizaldi-Lozano N, Insfrán-Sánchez M, Cobos-Aguilar H. Lectura crítica de investigación clínica por médicos internos de pregrado. Rev Med IMSS 2003;41(4):281-287.

12. Leyva-González F, Viniegra-Velázquez L. Lectura crítica en médicos residentes de las especialidades troncales. Rev Invest Clin 1999;51:31-38.

13. Mercado-Barajas J, Viniegra-Velázquez L, Leyva- González F. Aptitud para la lectura crítica de informes de investigaciones clínicas en médicos residentes del IMSS en Jalisco. Rev Invest Clin 2001;53(5):413-421.

14. González-Cobos RP, Ríos-Hernández J, Landeros- Morales C. Aptitud para la lectura crítica de artículos de investigación clínica en residentes de psiquiatría. Rev Invest Clin 2001;53(1):28-34.

15. Espinosa-Alarcón P, Viniegra-Velázquez L. Lectura crítica en grupos escogidos de estudiantes de medicina. Rev Invest Clin 1994;46:407-415.

16. Pérez-Rodríguez BA, Viniegra-Velázquez L. Lectura crítica por profesores de medicina. Estrategias educativas para su desarrollo. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 1999;37(2):103-109.

17. Cobos-Aguilar H, Espinosa-Alarcón P, Viniegra- Velázquez L. Comparación de dos estrategias educativas en la lectura crítica de médicos residentes. Rev Invest Clin 1996;48(6):431-436.

18. Cobos-Aguilar H, Espinosa-Alarcón P, Viniegra-Velázquez L. Persistencia del aprendizaje de la lectura crítica en médicos residentes. Rev Invest Clin 1998;50(1):43-46.

19. Insfrán-Sánchez M, Viniegra-Velázquez L. La formación de profesores en el área de la salud. Papel de la discusión en pequeños grupos para el desarrollo de la aptitud de la lectura crítica. Rev Invest Clin 2004;56(4):466-476.

20. Siegel S. Estadística no paramétrica aplicada a las ciencias de la conducta. Tercera edición. México: Trillas; 1990. p. 344.

21. Pérez-Padilla JR, Viniegra-Velázquez L. Método para calcular la distribución de las calificaciones esperadas por azar en un examen de tipo falso, verdadero y no sé. Rev Invest Clin 1989;41(4): 375-379.