Sabag-Ruiz E, Osuna-Bernal J, Brito-Zurita OR, Gómez-Alcalá AV, Ornelas-Aguirre JM

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 413-420
PDF size: 171.44 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: the peripheral face palsy (PFP) is the commonest acute cranial neuropathy. The PFP has a showy clinical pattern which contrasts with a favorable course. Our objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity for the nervous excitability test (NET) with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and the time required to obtain face symmetry.
Methods: an analytical cross-sectional study was made in 22 patients with PFP. The goal was the time (days) to obtain face symmetry. The sensitivity and specificity was carried out.
Results: a sensitivity and specificity of the NET was of 100 %. The correlation corrected by sex and age between both variables was 0, 89. The average in days of recovery was smaller in those with a positive NET (p ‹ 0.05) test.
Conclusions: the test of nervous excitability for PFP with TENS is safe and simple to use in primary care and urgencies services.

REFERENCES

1. Pardal-Fernández JM, García-Álvarez G, Jerez-García P, Marco-Giner J, Almodóvar-Álvarez C. Parálisis facial periférica. Utilidad de la neurofisiología clínica. Revisión. Rev Neurol 2003;36(10): 991-996.

2. Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injury. Brain 1943; 66:237-288.

3. Alford BR, Jerger JF, Coats AC, Peterson CR, Weber SC. Neurophysiology of facial nerve testing. Arch Otolaryngol 1973;97:214-219.

4. Alford BR, Weber SC, Sessions RB. Neurodiagnostic studies in facial paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1970;79:227-233.

5. Fisch U. Maximal nerve excitability testing vs. electroneuronography. Arch of Otolaringol 1980;106: 352-357,1980.

6. Laumen EPJ, Jongkees LBW. On the prognosis of peripheral facial paralysis of endotemporal origin. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol 1963;72:621-636, 894-899.

7. May M. The prognosis accuracy of the maximal stimulation compared with that of the nerve excitability test in Bell’s palsy. Laryngoscope 1971;81: 931-938.

8. Kimura J, Giron LT, Young SM. Electrophysiological study of Bell’s palsy: electrically elicitaded blink reflex in assessment of prognosis. Arch Otolaryngol 1976;102:140.

9. Ghonim MR, Gavilan C. Blink reflex: prognostic value in acute peripheral facial palsy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1990;52(2):75-79.

10. Jori J, Szekely L, Kiss JG, Toth F. The prognostic value of facial nerve conduction velocity in patients with Bell’s palsy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998; 23(6):520-523.

11. Leclaire R, Tremblay L, Dupuis M. Prognostic value of nerve excitability test in Bell’s palsy. Can J Otolaryngol 1975;4(2):352-357.

12. Wang Y. Electroneurography and other electric tests on prognostic assessment of Bell’s palsy. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 1990;25(3): 138-41,189.

13. Dumitru D, Walsh NE, Porter LD. Electrophysiology evaluation of the facial nerve in Bell’s palsy. A review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988;67(4):137-144

14. May M, Blumenthal F, Klein SR. Acute Bell’s palsy: prognostic value of evoked electromyography, maximal stimulation, and other electrical tests. Am J Otol 1983;5(1):1-7.

15. Danielides V, Skevas A, Van Cauwenberge P. A comparison of electroneuronography with facial nerve latency testing for prognostic accuracy in patients with Bell’s palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253(1-2):35-38.

16. Rimpilainen I, Eskola H, Laippala P, Laranne J, Karma P. Prognostication of Bell’s palsy using transcraneal magnetic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1997;529:111-115.

17. Pérez-Chávez E, Gómez-Martínez C, Guzmán- González JM, Escobar-Rodríguez D, López-Roldán VM, et al. Guía clínica para la rehabilitación del paciente con parálisis facial periférica. Rev Med IMSS 2004;42(5):426-436.