medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2012, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2012; 16 (3)

Fibula transplant caudal vertical distraction for reconstruction of lower jaw defect caused by firearm projectile and rehabilitated with bone-integrated implants

Ceseña MJF, López NJC, Ruiz RR, Jiménez CR

Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 193-202
PDF size: 314.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The present study presents satisfactory aesthetic and functional results achieved after correction of facial asymmetry in a patient subject to reconstruction with fibula graft of a wound caused by firearm projectile. Equally presented in this study is the rehabilitation of the stomatog­nathic complex through placement of bone-integrated implants. Proc­edure was accomplished in four surgical phases. Previous clinical and imaging evaluation was performed with support of stereolithographic studies. The first phase encompasses osteogenic distraction in caudal direction in the chin region. In the second phase, osteogenic distraction is performed bilaterally in caudal direction in the body of the lower jaw. The third surgical phase encompasses reconstruction of the lower lip. The fourth and final surgical phase comprehends the placement of bone-integrated implants. Through careful case analysis and available diagnostics tools surgical treatment sequence could be planned. Shape and anatomical dimension of lower jaw region could be attained. Another achievement was correction of soft tissue scars caused by lower jaw reconstruction sequels. Treatment was completed with masticatory function rehabilitation with the help of an implant-supported prosthesis.


REFERENCES

  1. Swennen GRJ, Eulzer C, Schutyser F, Hüttmann C. Assessment of the distraction regenerate using three dimensional quantitative computer tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 64-73.

  2. Rachmiel A, Srouji S, Peled M. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30: 510-517.

  3. Klesper B, Lazar F, Sie-Egger M. Vertical distraction osteogenesis of fibula transplants for mandibular reconstruction: a preliminary study. J of Cranio Maxillofac Surg 2002; 30: 280-285.

  4. Schleier P, Hyckel P, Fried W, Beinemann J. Vertical distraction of fibula transplant in a case of mandibular defect caused by shotgun injury. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006.

  5. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R, Schierle H. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30: 89-103.

  6. Pacicca DM, Patel N, Lee C, Salisbury K, Lehmann W. Expression of angiogenic factors during distraction osteogenesis. Bone 2003; 33: 889-898.

  7. Boyne PJ. Osseous reconstruction of the maxilla and the mandible. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 1997: 3-11.

  8. Gullane PD, Holmes H. mandibular reconstruction: new concepts. Arch Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg 1986; 112: 714.

  9. García-García A, Somoza-Martín M, Gandara-Vila P. Alveolar distraction before insertion of dental implants in the posterior mandible. British J Of Oral And Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41: 376-379.

  10. Uckan S, Dolanmaz D, Kalayci A, Cilasun U. Distraction osteogenesis of basal mandibular bone for reconstruction of the alveolar ridge. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2002; 40: 393-396.

  11. Bianchi A. Prótesis implantosoportada. Bases biológicas-biomecánicas-aplicaciones clínicas. Primera edición; 2001.

  12. Chiapasco M, Romeo E. Rehabilitación implantosoportada en casos complejos. AMOLCA 2006.

  13. Schwartz HC. Mandibular reconstruction using the dacron-urethane prosthesis and autogenic cancellous bone: review of 32 cases. J Plast Reconstruct Surg 1984; 73: 387-92.

  14. Tayaponsak P, O’Brien DA, Monteiro CB, Arreo-Diaz LL. Autologous fibrin adhesive in mandibular reconstruction with particulate cancellous bone and marrow. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1994; 52: 161-166.

  15. Macintosh RB, Henny FA. A Spectrum of application of autogenous costocondral grafts. J Maxillofac Surg 1997; 5: 257.

  16. Meyer U, Kleinheinz J, Joos U. Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery. J Of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 2004; 32: 140-149.

  17. Moses JJ. Alveolar and skeletal distraction osteogenesis for the maxillofacial surgeon. Surgical Clinics Aaoms 2005: 137.

  18. Block MS, Chang A. Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 309-314.

  19. Bouletreau PJ, Warren SM, Longaker MT. The molecular biology of distraction osteogenesis. J of Cranio Maxillofac Surg 2002; 30: 1-11.

  20. Meyer U, Meyer T, Schlegel W, Scholz H. Tissue differentiation and cytokine synthesis during strain-related bone formation in distraction osteogenesis. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2001; 39: 22-29.

  21. Kanno T, Takahashi T. Tensile mechanical strain up-regulates. Runx2 and osteogenic factor expression in human periosteal cells: Implications for distraction osteogenesis. 10.1016/Joms.2004.07.023.

  22. Lynch SE, Genco RJ, Marx RE. Tissue engineering. Application in maxillofacial.

  23. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Mueller MC, Kramer FJ. Effect of platelet-rich-plasma on cranial distraction osteogenesis in sheep: Preliminary clinical and radiographic results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 294-304.

  24. Shvyrkov MB, Shamsudinov AH. DD non-free osteoplasty of the mandible in maxillofacial gunshot wounds: mandibular reconstruction by compression–osteodistraction. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37: 261-267.

  25. Hasse ARF, Örksen MP, Zimmermann CE. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2005; 43: 105-112.

  26. Kessler AP, Neukama FW, Wiltfang JB. Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2005; 43: 392–398.

  27. Klug CN, Millesi-Schobel GA. Preprosthetic vertical distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using an l-shaped osteotomy and titanium membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 1302-1308.

  28. Yazawa M, Kishi K. Expression of bone morphogenetic proteins during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 587-592.

  29. Heffez LB, Kirton M. Vector control in transportation osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 737-746.

  30. Suhr MAA, Kreusch TH. Technical considerations in distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33: 89-94.

  31. Swennen G, Dempf R, Schliephake H. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of the literature. Part II: experimental studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 123-135.

  32. Miloro M. Peterson’s principies of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2nd edition, Bc Decker Inc, 2004: 783-801.

  33. Al Ruhaimi KA. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: An experimental investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001: 30: 220-227.

  34. Robiony M, Toro C, Stucki-Mccormick SU. The “Fad” (Floating Alveolar Device): A bidirectional distraction system for distraction osteogenesis of the alveolar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 (Suppl 2): 136-142.

  35. Lozada JL, Goodacre C. The history of implant dentistry. Loma Linda University Calf.

  36. Nobel Biocare Services AG. The story about an invention that makes people smile. Sweden 2005.

  37. Sieg P, Zieron JO, Bierwolf S, Hakim SG. Defect-related variations in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts. A review of 96 cases. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2002; 40: 322-329.

  38. Askew A, Fleming PS, Downie IP. Adjunctive use of dental implants in mandibular reconstruction with a free fibular graft. British J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2005; 43: 341-342.

  39. Garg-Arun K. Bone biology, harvesting, and Grafting for dental implant: rationale and clinical applications.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com