medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2011, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2011; 50 (4)

Validation of the laparoscopic hysterectomy through an only surgical approach as a new technique in Cuba

Barreras GJE, Torres PR, Faife FB, López MAB, Torres MRM, Campillo DO

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 525-533
PDF size: 174.08 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: to decrease the act of aggression to patient's biology and to minimize the access to surgical area has been a concern and also a permanent ambition of surgeon. Surgery thorough natural orifices involves to access to abdominal cavity through stomach, colon, vagina, uterus or bladder and in fact eliminates the approaches to abdominal wall including it in a new surgical paradigm: the "surgery without traces". In 2007, it was proposed a new technique of trans-umbilical endoscopic surgery in keeping with the technical principles of surgery through natural orifices. Its use in gynecology begins from the decade of 70s when the tubal ligatures and recently the only approach innovative techniques of one only port have been introduced in procedures more complex.
Objectives: to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic hysterectomy through an only approach by means of a new technique.
Methods: a prospective study of cases-series was conducted as well as a hysterectomy technique completely laparoscopic by means of an only approach and using instruments designed to that end.
Results: this technique was applied in 10 patients diagnosed with uterine fibroma. The surgical time was of 115 min (75-160) and bleeding mean was of 75 mL (20-400); there were not intraoperative and postoperative complications in study cases.
Conclusions: laparoscopic hysterectomy through an only approach is a feasible, safe and reproducible technique for other minimal access surgery services of our country.


REFERENCES

  1. Himal HS. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery. The future of general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1647-52.

  2. Ruiz J. Evolución histórica de la terapéutica endoscópica. En: Ruiz J, Torres R, Martínez MA, Fernández A, Pascual H. Cirugía Endoscópica. Fundamentos y aplicaciones. La Habana: Editorial Científico Técnica; 2000. p. 19-22.

  3. Kalloo A, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(1):114-7.

  4. Swanströn LL. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy. 2009;41:82-5.

  5. Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martín IJ, O'Rourke NA, Maddern GJ. A review of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg. 2008;24(7):583-602.

  6. Gutt CN, Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA. Success and complication parameters for laparoscopic surgery: a benchmark for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy. 2009;41:3641.

  7. Voermans RP, Worm AM, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Breedveld P, Bemelman WA, Fockens P. In vitro comparison and evaluation of seven gastric closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy. 2008;40:595-601.

  8. Sodergren MH, Clark J, Athanasiou T, Teare J, Guang-Zhong Y, Darzi A. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: critical appraisal of applications in clinical practice. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:680-7.

  9. Fan Zhu J. Scarless endoscopic surgery: NOTES or TUES. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1889-90.

  10. Fan Zhu J, Zhang Ma Y, Zhu Yu JL, Hai Hu. Transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy with the trichannel trocar technique: A porcine feasibility study. Surgical Innovation. 2008;15(2):95-9.

  11. Desimone CP, Ueland FR. Gynecologic laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:319-41.

  12. Lee JE, Park YN, Nam SH, Choi DS, Kim TJ, Choi CH, et al. A comparison of Laparoscopically-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Korean J Gynecol Oncol Colposc. 2006;17:99-104.

  13. Pelosi MA. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med. 1991;88:721-6.

  14. Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):157-61.

  15. Wook Jung Y, Woo Lee D, Hoon Kim J, Tae Kim Y, Im Hwang Y, Ji Nam E, et al. The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;20:720-6.

  16. Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1419-27.

  17. Torres Peña R, Barreras González J, Campillo Dono O, Ruiz Torres J, Olivé González J, Torres Mora RM, et al. Colecistectomía endoscópica transumbilical: estudio preclínico de factibilidad en un modelo porcino. Rev Cubana Cir [serie en internet]. 2010 Jun [citado 18 de noviembre de 2011];49(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932010000200005&lng=es

  18. Von Gruenigen VE, Ponsky LE, Sawyer MD, Hurd WW. Recent Innovations in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Implications for Gynecology. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. 2009;25(2):67-72.

  19. Langebrekke A, Qviqstad E. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Single-Port Access without Vaginal Surgery. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2009;16(5):609-11.

  20. Faife B, Barreras JE, Martínez MA, Hernández MA, González T, Casanova G, et al. Criterios clínicos indicación HL. Experiencia cubana. Archivos Hospital Universitario "Calixto García". 2006;2(2):1-17.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com