medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2011; 50 (3)

Reinterventions in complications of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Roque GR, Martínez AMA, Torres PR, López MAB, Pereira FJG, Barreras GJ

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 302-311
PDF size: 153.39 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Over past years some centers with experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy have published the complications and treatment of this procedure. The aim of present paper is to describe the experience in 23 patients re-operated on due to the postoperative complications of above mentioned procedure carried out in the National Center of Minimal Access Surgery with the report of the results obtained. A longitudinal, retrospective and descriptive study was conducted to review the medical records of the patients re-operated on due suspicion of complications after the laparoscopic cholescystectomy. Twenty three patients were re-operated on (0.2 %) with a man age of 49 years (range 22 to 73 years, SD ± 10). The re-laparoscopy was the route for the re-intervention (70 %) and only 3 (13 %) patients required open surgery and it is the endospic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a useful procedure to fulfill the solution of some of these complications. The mean surgical time in the re-interventions was of 67 min (range 30-120 min), hospital stay had a mean of 4 and 5 days, respectively. There were 2 patients (9 %) wit a late reintervention at 72 hours after cholecystectomy and deceased with septic shock pictures. Laparoscopy is an appropriate procedure for the re-interventions in patients with suspicion of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with less morbidity and mortality over other procedures and its effectiveness for treatment of these complications is demonstrated.


REFERENCES

  1. Schafer M, Krahenbhl LW, Buhler M. Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2001;182:291-7.

  2. Azagra JS, DeSimone P, Goergen M. Is there a place for laparoscopy in the management of post-cholecystectomy biliary injuries? World J Surg. 2001;25:1331-4.

  3. Leeder PC, Mathews T, Krzeminska K, Dehn TCB. Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2004;91:312-7.

  4. Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, lantsberg l. Early relaparoscopy for management of suspected postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1257-62.

  5. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W. Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:572-4.

  6. Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbuhl L. Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:275-80.

  7. Lee CM, Stewart L, Way LW. Postcholecystectomy abdominal bile ollections. Arch Surg. 2000;135:538-42. Discussion 42-44.

  8. Ferriman A. Laparoscopic surgery: two thirds of injuries initially missed. BMJ. 2000;321:784.

  9. Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:164-71.

  10. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A. Complications of laparoscopic surgery: a national survey of 4292 hospitlas and an analysis of 77604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:914.

  11. Wills V, Jorgensens O, Hunt D. Role of relaparoscopic in the management of minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecistectomy. Brith J Surg. 2000;87:176-80.

  12. Fernández Santiesteban L, Silvera García JR, Díaz Calderín JM, Vilorio Haza P, Loys Fernández JL. Reintervenciones de urgencia en cirugía videolaparoscópica. Rev Cubana Cir [serie en internet]. 2003 Dic [citado 17 de octubre de 2010];42(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932003000400010&lng=es

  13. Fernández Santiesteban L, Díaz Calderín JM, Silvera García JR, Vilorio Haza P, Loys Fernández JL. Lesiones de la vía biliar en cirugía laparoscópica: análisis de 10 años de trabajo. Rev Cubana Cir [serie en internet]. 2003 Dic [citado 17 de octubre de 2010];42(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932003000400009&lng=es

  14. Sánchez Sánchez A, Torres Aja L, Cabarroca Castillo FA, Mena Guerra R. Colecistectomia laparoscópica. Estudio de 5000 pacientes. Rev Electron Biomed/Electron J Biomed. 2008;2:47-54.

  15. Ibarra Jiménez LE, Haro García L, Murguía Arredondo JA, Corbalá Fuentes C, Fletes Kelly A, Velásquez Lizárraga R. Experiencia quirúrgica en cirugía laparoscópica. Rev Med IMSS. 2003;41(1):75-80.

  16. Simon P, Dexter L, Glenn V, Demetrios D, Martin I, Sue Ling H, et al. Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;179:316-9.

  17. Papasavas PK, Caushaj PF, McCormick JT, Quinlin RF, Hayetian FD, Maurer J, et al. Laparoscopic management of complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:610-4.

  18. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Aft RL, Frisella MM, et al. Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgery. 2005;138:708-15.

  19. David R, Flum E, Dellinger P, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA. 2003;289:1 639-64.

  20. Aduna M, Larena JA, Martin D. Bile duct leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:480-7.

  21. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, Van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus smallincision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD006229.

  22. Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M, Zakai B, Ayalon A, Shabtai M. Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:994-6.

  23. Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B. Iatrogenic biliary injury: 13 305 cholecystectomies experienced by a single surgical team over more than 13 years. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1 077-86.

  24. Constantine P, Syrakos T. Bile leaks from the duct of Luschka (subvesical duct): review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391:441-7.

  25. Callery MP. Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1654-8.

  26. Bektas H, Schrem H, Winny M, Klempnauer J. Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems. British Journal of Surgery. 2007;94:1 119-27.

  27. Honda G, Iwanaga T, Kurata M, Watanabe F, Satoh H, Iwasaki K. The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;15:293-6.

  28. Strasberg SM. Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:543-7.

  29. Honda G, Iwanaga T, Kurata M. Dissection of the gallbladder from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or subacute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:293-6.

  30. Strasberg SM. Error traps and vasculo-biliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:284-92.

  31. Parmeggiani D, Cimmino G, Cerbone D, Avenia N, Ruggero R, Gubitosi A, et al. Biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: three case reports and literature review. G Chir. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1-2):16-9.

  32. Ahmad F, Saunders RN, Lloyd GM, Lloyd DM, Robertson GSM. An algorithm for the management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:51-6.

  33. Valsangiacomo P. Lesiones quirúrgicas de la vía biliar, análisis actual de la terapeutica. Monografía de Graduación en Cirugía. Clínica Quirúrgica 3. Prof. Ruso L. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital Maciel, Uruguay; 2004.

  34. Steven Dawson L. Interventional Radiology in the Management of Bile Duct Injuries. Surg Clin North America. 1994;74(4):865-74.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com