Siu MSG, Téliz MMA, Sánchez CJ

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 135-142
PDF size: 479.51 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In this study, we introduce the clinical aspects of interest of the ischemic cardiopathy when evaluated by CMR, as well as the advantages that this study method already have upon those existent ones. We considered the advantagesand the risks of the use of gadolinium (Gd-DTPA), the current status and the future perspective of CMR in our country.
Generalization: The ischemic cardiopathy has high prevalence and mortality in Mexico and worldwide, from that premise, timely diagnosis (primary prevention) and the identification of the myocardial damage (secondary prevention) in presence of an ischemic event are of supreme importance.
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a relatively new method that allows the appropriate evaluation of the ischemia, heart attacks and myocardial viability, with appropriate space resolution and without exposure to ionizing radiation. The technique includes multiple sequences of static imaging, angiogram imaging; that allows us to make a comprehensive evaluation of the heart.
Conclusion: Fast technological development promises to diminish even more the times of studies carrying out, keeping the high resolution; it is still pending to solve, the quality of the diagnostic imaging of coronary magnetic angioresonance, as well as the time reduction in obtaining said images.

REFERENCES

1. American AH. Heart and stroke statistical update. American Heart Association, Dallas; 2003.

2. Bruckenberger E. Herzbericht 2000 mit Transplantationschirurgie. 13. Bericht des Krankenhausaus-schusses der Arbeitsgemeinschaft derobersten Landesgesundheitsbehörden der Länder (AOLG). Hannover; 2001.

3. Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and the role of adenosine pharmacologic stress. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94(2A): 26D-31D.

4. Lund GK, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: Evaluation with first pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compare with 201 T1 SPECT imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 49-57.

5. Cerqueira MD, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002; 18(1): 539-42.

6. Ángel E, et al. Non invasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress Echocardiography. Circulation 1999; 99: 763-70.

7. Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 176: 593-606.

8. LaFlore J, Goldstein H, Rogan R, Keelan T, Ewell A. A prospective evaluation of adverse experiences following the administration of Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine) injection (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1989. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 1989, p. 1067.

9. Wolf SD, Schwitter J, et al. Myocardial first-pass Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A multicenter Dose-Range study. Circulation 2004; 110: 732-7.

10. Dembo LG, Shifrin RY, Wolf SD. MR Imaging in ischemic heart disease. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2004; 42: 651-73.

11. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Waltering KU. MRI in coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 2155-62.

12. Wagner A, Marholdt H, et al. MR Imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2003; 11: 49-66.

13. Pennell DJ, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. European heart Journal 2004; 25: 1940-65.

14. Panting JR, et al. Abnormal Subendocardial Perfusion in Cardiac Syndrome X Detected by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1948-53.

15. Hundley WG, et al. Utility of Fast Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging and display for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients not well suited for second harmonic stress echocardiography. Circulation 1999; 100: 1697-702.

16. Wu, et al. Prognostic Significance of Microvascular Obstruction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 765-72.

17. Judo, et al. Phisiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation 1995; 92: 1902-10.

18. Pennell DJ, et al. Imaging Techniques: Cardiovascular magnetic resonante. Heart 2001; 85: 581-9.