Mercadillo RE, Sánchez-Rey AE, Sánchez-Cortazar J, Ramírez E, Barrios FA

Language: Spanish
References: 49
Page: 11-20
PDF size: 302.61 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Attention deficit disorder (ADD) refers to a neurobehavioral condition commonly initiated in childhood. Its clinical diagnosis involves poor attention, distractibility, difficulties to inhibit motor behaviors and cognitive impulsivity. It is suggested that ADD is classified in two general types correlated with different neurocognitive qualities. One is manifested in executive frontal dysfunctions (ADD). In the other type dominates hyperactivity/ impulsivity (ADHD) and it is associated with deficiencies in working memory and alterations in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Results obtained by using electroencephalography, event-related potential paradigms and voxel brain morphometry suggest anomaliesin the brain structure and function correlated with ADD, particularly in the frontal, parietal and temporal cortices, in addition to regions involved in the fronto-estriatal connections. On the other hand, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) constitutes a technique to obtain brain images which can be int rpreted as regions and networks of neural activity elicited during the performance of a cognitive process. Based on the information that the ADD patients are susceptible to cognitive interferences, some researches have applied the classical and the counting versions of the Stroop task paradigms in fMRI. In comparison with control subjects, adult patients show alack of neural activation in the anterior cingulated cortex. Nevertheless, results in children are more controversial and attribute neurobiological and social factors in the ADD etiology. The anterior cingulated cortex and prefrontal region of the humanbrain conform the execution system of attention and their function is essential for emotional processes. The neurocognitive relation between attention and emotion involves the influence of the affective system in the alert and execution systems of attention through reciprocal connections between limbic and frontal regions, which permit amnemonic and affective valuation of the attended environment. Understanding the relations between attention and emotion is essential in basic and clinical approaches, due to the co-morbidity of ADD with some emotional disorders, such as the oppositional defiant disorder, anxiety and impulsive aggression, the last one elicited by uncontrolled experiences of anger. In this sense, some studies describe that the metabolic brain activity correlated with the experience of anger is manifested in the frontal, anterior cingulated and insular cortices and the temporal pole. Clinical situations require individualized decisions on the immediate and emergent treatment of one case. Furthermore, when the clinical case refers to a behavioral disorder probably related with neurobiological dysfunctions, a comparison of test with control subjects is necessary. In this sense, the present work constitutes an fMRI study designed to evaluate neurological functional alterations in a child patient diagnosed with ADHD, with persistent severe impulsive aggression behaviors that required a swift evaluation to enhance the diagnosis and treatment proposed by other clinical techniques. Besides the patient, three infant participants were evaluated. One of them was diagnosed with ADD but did not manifest aggressive or impulsive behaviors and was not under any pharmacological treatment. The other two healthy children had no neurological and psychiatric disorders history. All the participants presented similar intellectual coefficient and performed the same cognitive and emotional tests. In the case of the patient, test were applied in two conditions: under the proposed pharmacological treatment and without medication. The attention test consisted in a version of the counting Stroop task in Spanish language, presented in a block design through the EPrime software. Subjects practiced the task in a personal computer before the functional image acquisition and were trained to answer by using a bottom response system that will be used in the scanner. For the emotional-anger paradigm, children were interviewed about scenes and situations of their personal experience which elicited anger and calm. Situations were ordered and planned in a block design to be executed in the magnetic resonance instrument. During the functional images acquisition children listened to the situations onducted by imaginery techniques. Functional images were acquired in a 1.5 T G.E. instrument in the Magnetic Resonance Unit of the Hospital Ángeles Metropolitano in Mexico City. Data were analyzed by using the SPM 5 software applying a contrast using FWE with p ‹ 0.05. Brain coordinates obtained in SPM 5 were converted to the Talairach Deamond system in order to obtain the Brodmann areas related to those coordinates. During the performance of the counting Stroop task, the patient with ADHD under medication manifested activation in frontal areas, but not during the medication suspension trial. Frontal activity identified in this patient in the treatment trial was similar to that identified in the unaggressive ADD patient. In both cases, ADHD without medication and ADD, a lack of activity was identified in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Nevertheless, activation in ACC, in parietal and temporal regions was present in the aggressive patient under treatment but not in the suspension condition. These results may suggest that an inadequate attention process distort the environment stimuli, which is necessary for the subject’s correct affective evaluation of the situation. During the experience of anger, the patient under treatment manifested activity in the parahippocampal region, as well as in the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices. Results discussed in this work agree with those previously reported and offer cues to complement the diagnosis and treatment of ADD/ADHD and their relations with emotional disorders. Particularly, the design used here could be used for the analysis and evaluation of some pharmacological and behavioral treatments clinically applied in ADD. In addition, it helps to understand the participation of multipotential brain regions and neural networks involved in several cognitive processes, such as attention, working memory and emotion. Finally, we proposed some ideas to interpret these results using fMRI and ADD: 1. It is necessary a consensual and standard integration of neuropsychological tests which identify different cognitive qualities of ADD. 2. The selection of children samples to study the neurobiology of ADD must include several variables associated with its etiology, such as parental relations, social and scholar environments. 3. Experimental paradigms could be designed to be performed using different neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI or event-related potential. Thus, the results of the same test can be used to complement different approaches. 4. Results obtained by fMRI must not be understood in a phrenologycal and deterministic approach, but as brain region activations indicating dynamic neural networks.

REFERENCES

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) 4. Washington: 1995.

2. OMS. Clasificación de los trastornos mentales del comportamiento: con glosario y criterios diagnósticos de investigación: CIE-10. Madrid: Médica Panamericana; 2000.

3. Galindo G, De la Peña F, De la Rosa N, Robles E, et al. Análisis neuropsicológico de las características cognoscitivas de un grupo de adolescentes con trastorno por déficit de atención. Salud Mental 2001;24:50-57.

4. Gansler DA, Fucetola R, Krengel M, Stetson S, et al. Are there cognitive subtypes in adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder? J Nerv Ment Dis 1998;186:776-781.

5. Pérez-Alvarez F, Tinoneda C. El hipercinético a la luz del PASS. Revista Neurología 1999;28:472-475.

6. López V, López-Calderon J, Ortega R, Kreither J et al. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder involves differential cortical processing in a visual spatial attention paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:2540-2548.

7. Ricardo-Garcell J. Aportes del electroencefalograma convencional y el análisis de frecuencias para el estudio del trastorno por déficit de atención. Segunda parte. Salud Mental 2004;27:7-14.

8. Berquin PC, Giedd JN, Jacobsen LK, Hamburger SD, et al. Cerebellum in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a morphometric MRI study. Neurology 1998;50:1087-1093.

9. Castellanos FX, Lee PP, Sharp W, Jeffries NO, et al. Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Jama 2002;288:1740-1748.

10. Mackie S, Shaw P, Lenroot R, Pierson R, et al. Cerebellar development and clinical outcome in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:647-655.

11. Shaw P, Lerch J, Greenstein D, Sharp W, et al. Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and clinical outcome in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63: 540-549.

12. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, et al. Cortical abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 2003;362:1699-1707.

13. Almeida L. Alteraciones anatómico-funcionales en el trastorno por déficit de la atención con hiperactividad. Salud Mental 2005;28(3):1-12.

14. Mercadillo RE, Barrios FA. Neuroimagen de las emociones morales. En: Ojeda RI, Mercadillo RE (eds). De las neuronas a la cultura: Ensayos multidisciplinarios sobre ciencias cognitivas. México: CONACULTA; 2007.

15. Raichle ME. Cognitive neuroscience. Bold insights. Nature 2001;412:128-130.

16. Carter CS, Krener P, Chaderjian M, Northcutt C, et al. Asymmetrical visual-spatial attentional performance in ADHD: evidence for a right hemispheric deficit. Biol Psychiatry 1995;37:789-797.

17. Awh E, Gehring WJ. The anterior cingulate cortex lends a hand in response selection. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:853-854.

18. Gruber SA, Rogowska J, Holcomb P, Soraci S, et al. Stroop performance in normal control subjects: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002;16:349-360.

19. Bush G, Frazier JA, Rauch SL, Seidman LJ, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop. Biol Psychiatry 1999;45:1542-1552.

20. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Shin LM, Rauch SL. The counting Stroop: a cognitive interference task. Nat Protoc 2006;1:230-233.

21. Schneider S, Unnewehr S, In-Albon T, Margraf J. Attention bias in children of patients with panic disorder. Psychopathology 2008;41:179-186.

22. Smith AB, Taylor E, Brammer M, Toone B, et al. Task-specific hypoactivation in prefrontal and temporoparietal brain regions during motor inhibition and task switching in medication-naive children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1044-1051.

23. Wohl M, Boni C, Asch M, Cortese S, et al. Lack of association of the dopamine transporter gene in a French ADHD sample. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2008;147B(8):1509-10.

24. Posner MI, Sheese BE, Odludas Y, Tang Y. Analyzing and shaping human attentional networks. Neural Netw 2006;19:1422-1429.

25. Fichtenholtz HM, Dean HL, Dillon DG, Yamasaki H, et al. Emotion-attention network interactions during a visual oddball task. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004;20:67-80.

26. Taylor JG, Fragopanagos NF. The interaction of attention and emotion. Neural Netw 2005;18:353-369.

27. Biederman J. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a selective overview. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:1215-1220.

28. Connor DF, Doerfler LA. ADHD With Comorbid Oppositional Defiant Disorder or Conduct Disorder: Discrete or Nondistinct Disruptive Behavior Disorders? J Atten Disord 2007.

29. Goodman G, Gerstadt C, Pfeffer CR, Stroh M, et al. ADHD and aggression as correlates of suicidal behavior in assaultive prepubertal psychiatric inpatients. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2008;38:46-59.

30. Jensen PS, Hinshaw SP, Kraemer HC, Lenora N, et al. ADHD comorbidity findings from the MTA study: comparing comorbid subgroups. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:147-158.

31. Volavka J. The neurobiology of violence: an update. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999;11:307-314.

32. Richards TL, Deffenbacher JL, Rosen LA, Barkley RA, et al. Driving anger and driving behavior in adults with ADHD. J Atten Disord 2006;10:54-64.

33. Cabiya-Morales JJ, Padilla L, Sayers-Montalvo S, Pedrosa O, et al. Relationship between aggressive behavior, depressed mood, and other disruptive behavior in Puerto Rican children diagnosed with attention deficit and disruptive behaviors disorders. P R Health Sci J 2007;26:43-49.

34. Marshall VG, Longwell L, Goldstein MJ, Swanson JM. Family factors associated with aggressive symptomatology in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1990;31:629-636.

35. Damasio AR, Grabowski TJ, Bechara A, Damasio H, et al. Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:1049-1056.

36. Dougherty DD, Shin LM, Alpert NM, Pitman RK, et al. Anger in healthy men: a PET study using script-driven imagery. Biol Psychiatry 1999;46:466-472.

37. Kimbrell TA, George MS, Parekh PI, Ketter TA, et al. Regional brain activity during transient self-induced anxiety and anger in healthy adults. Biol Psychiatry 1999;46:454-465.

38. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, et al. The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 1998;6:270-282.

39. Ricardo-Garcell J, Galindo y Villa G, Serra E, Reyes E, et al. Hallazgos clínicos relacionados con la selección de un grupo control para el estudio del trastorno por déficit de atención 1. Salud Mental 2004;27:1-5.

40. Allen G, Buxton RB, Wong EC, Courchesne E. Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 1997;275:1940-1943.

41. Barrios M, Guàrdia J. Relación del cerebelo con las funciones cognitivas: evidencias neuroanatómicas, clínicas y de neuroimagen. Rev Neurol 2001;33:582-591.

42. Romero TO, Lara-Muñoz C, Herrera S. Estudio familiar del trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad. Salud Mental 2002;25:41-46.

43. Ricardo-Garcell J. Aportes del electroencefalograma convencional y el análisis de frecuencias para el estudio del trastorno por déficit de atención. Primera parte. Salud Mental 2004;27:22-27.

44. Bennett MR, Hacker PM. Emotion and cortical-subcortical function: conceptual developments. Prog Neurobiol 2005;75:29-52.

45. Greene J, Haidt J. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:517-523.

46. Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 2002;16:331-348.

47. Rolls ET. Emotion explained. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

48. Friston KJ. Experimental design and statistical issues. En: Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Frackowiak A (eds). Brain mapping The disorders.Sab Diego: Academic Press; 2000.