medigraphic.com
ISSN 2500-7106 (Electronic)
ISSN 0123-2576 (Print)
Medicina & Laboratorio

2008, Number 03-04

<< Back Next >>

Medicina & Laboratorio 2008; 14 (03-04)

¿Cómo obtener un extendido de sangre periférica de óptima calidad?

Campuzano MG

Language: Spanish
References: 93
Page: 125-152
PDF size: 2451.61 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Despite the huge technological advances and the development of new parameters in hematology, the blood smear remains as the “queen of assays” in the hematological diagnosis. For various reasons, out of the scope of this module, and to the misuse of technology, many laboratories have underestimated the values of the blood smear and as a result they hand the raw hematology results, as they come printed from the automatic analyzers, without an analysis of the blood smear, not even in the instances where the instrument alarm requires it, according to the good laboratory practices. In order to have an optimal analysis of the blood smear, threeconditions must be met: (1) an optimal blood smear, (2) optimal staining and (3) the smear being analyzed by competent personal.


REFERENCES

  1. Coulter WH. High speed automatic blood cell counter and cell size analyzer. Proc Natl Electronics Conf 1956; 12: 1034-1042.

  2. Cartwright GE. Diagnostic Laboratory Hematology. Grune and Stratton, New York, USA, 1963.

  3. Fossat C, David M, Harle JR, Sainty D, Horschowski N, Verdot JJ, et al. New parameters in erythrocyte counting. Value of histograms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111: 150-1154.

  4. Briggs C, Harrison P, Grant D, Staves J, MacHin SJ. New quantitative parameters on a recently introduced automated blood cell counter--the XE 2100. Clin Lab Haematol 2000; 22: 345-350.

  5. Wiwanitkit V. Plateletcrit, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width: its expected values and correlation with parallel red blood cell parameters. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2004; 10: 175-178.

  6. David O, Grillo A, Ceoloni B, Cavallo F, Podda G, Biancotti PP, et al. Analysis of red cell parameters on the Sysmex XE 2100 and ADVIA 120 in iron deficiency and in uraemic chronic disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2006; 66: 113-120.

  7. Noronha JF, Lorand-Metze IG, Grotto HZ. Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) and immature reticulocytes evaluations in mobilization process: new parameters measured by conventional blood cell counter. J Clin Lab Anal 2006; 20: 149-153.

  8. Agorasti A, Trivellas T, Papadopoulos V, Konstantinidou D. Innovative parameters RET-Y, sTfR, and sTfR-F index in patients with microcytic, hypochromic anemia. Their specialvalue for hemoglobinopathies. Lab Hematol 2007; 13:63-68.

  9. The National Commmittee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. NCCLS document H20-A, Volume12, Number 1. Reference Leukocyte Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrumental Methods. Approved Standard March 1992, section 3.1.2).

  10. Campuzano-Maya G. Del hemograma manual al hemograma de cuarta generación. Medicina & Laboratorio 2007; 133: 511-550.

  11. Campuzano-Maya G. Editorial: Los contadores de células: son excelentes pero no son perfectos. Medicina & Laboratorio 2005; 11: 309-310.

  12. Conn RB. Clinical laboratories. Profit center, production industry or patient-care resource? N Engl J Med 1978; 298: 422-427.

  13. Campuzano-Maya G. Papel del laboratorio clínico en la práctica médica. Laboratorio Al Día 1995; 5: 22-27.

  14. Forsman RW. The value of the laboratory professional in the continuum of care. Clin Leadersh Manag Rev 2002; 16: 370-373.

  15. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44: 750-759.

  16. Sociedad Colombiana de Patología Clínica. Manual de Codificación, Nomenclatura, Nivelación y Valores de Exámenes de laboratorio Clínico. Edimeco S.A., Medellín, Colombia. 2007, 1-100.

  17. College of American Pathologists. Workload Recording Method & Personnel Management Manual. 1992.

  18. República de Colombia, Ministerio de Protección Social. Resolución 1896 de 2001 por la cual se sustituye integralmente la Clasificación Única de Procedimientos en Salud.

  19. Sociedad Colombiana de Patología Clínica. Manual de Codificación, Nomenclatura, Nivelación y Valores de Exámenes de laboratorio Clínico. Edimeco S.A., Medellín, Colombia. 2008, 1-100.

  20. Campuzano-Maya G. El hemograma electrónico. Laboratorio Al Día 1995; 5: 28-41.

  21. Fajardo Lobo-Guerrero LF. Procedimientos básicos en hematología. In Técnicas de laboratorio en hematología clínica, Restrepo-Mesa A. Sociedad Colombiana de Hematología, Editorial de la Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia. 1975; 3-58.

  22. Bain BJ, Lewis SM, Bates I. Basic haematological techniques. In Dacie and Lewis practical haematology, Lewis SM, Bain BJ and Bates I. 5th edition, Churchill Livingston; Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2006; 26-57.

  23. Gagon TE, Athens JW, Boggs DR, Cartwright GE. An evaluation of the variance of leukocyte counts as performed with the hemocytometer, Coulter, and Fisher intruments. Tech Bull Regist Med Technol 1966; 36: 274-281.

  24. Pohland D. Evaluation of the automated haematology analyser Sysmex M-2000. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1989; 27: 41-47.

  25. Carlson DA, Ito RK, Statland BE, Daigneault R, DiPierro R, Horion L. Evaluation of the Sysmex CC-800. An automated eight-parameter hematology instrument. Am J Clin Pathol 1986; 86: 55-60.

  26. Smeets EH, van Wersch JW. Performance of a three-part dif impedance cytometer (Sysmex E-4000) in comparison with a cytochemical cytometer (Technicon H 6000). J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1988; 26: 531-540.

  27. Burgi W, Marti HR. Automated blood count analysis by trimodal size distribution of leukocytes with the SYSMEX E-5000. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1989; 27: 365-368.

  28. Hinchliffe RF, Laycock BJ, Clark SJ, Morton J, Anderson LM, Lilleyman JS. An evaluation of the Sequoia-Turner Cell Dyn 900. Clin Lab Haematol 1985; 7: 157-165.

  29. Barnard DF, Carter AB, Crosland-Taylor PJ, Stewart JW. An evaluation of the Coulter model S. J Clin Pathol Suppl (R Coll Pathol) 1969; 3: 26-33.

  30. Silver H. Comparison and evaluation of the model S Coulter Counter and the Technicon SMA-4A. Med Lab Technol 1971; 28: 163-171.

  31. Lappin TR, Lamont A, Nelson MG. An evaluation of the autoanalyzer SMA-4. J Clin Pathol 1969; 22: 11-18.

  32. Cave RJ, Holder RL, Morris TK, Taylor J, Smith D, Shinton NK. An evaluation of the Technicon H6000 haematology system. Clin Lab Haematol 1983; 5: 203-214.

  33. Lappin TR, Lamont A, Nelson MG. An evaluation of the Celloscope 401 electronic blood cell counter. J Clin Pathol 1972; 25: 539-542.

  34. Borud O, Stromme JH. Evaluation of Celloscope 421 for the simultaneous measurement of red blood cells, haematocrit and mean cell volume. Scand J Haematol 1974; 13: 246-251.

  35. Bessman JD, Gilmer PR, Jr., Gardner FH. Improved classification of anemias by MCV and RDW. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 80: 322-326.

  36. Cornbleet J, Kessinger S. Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 84: 620-626.

  37. Ross DW, Watson JS, Davis PH, Tracy SL. Evaluation of the Coulter three-part differential screen. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 84: 481-484.

  38. Sachse C, Henkel E. An evaluation of the CELL-DYN 1700 haematology analyser: automated cell counting and threepart leucocyte differentiation. Clin Lab Haematol 1996;18: 171-180.

  39. Whisler S, Dahlgren C. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex pocH-100i automated hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2005; 11: 107-117.

  40. Briggs C, Kunka S, Pennaneach C, Forbes L, Machin SJ. Performance evaluation of a new compact hematology analyzer, the Sysmex pocH-100i. Lab Hematol 2003; 9: 225-233.

  41. Payne BA, Pierre RV, Lee WK. Evaluation of the Toa E-5000 Automated Hematology Analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol 1987; 88: 51-57.

  42. Bain BJ, Neill PJ, Scott D, Scott TJ, Innis MD. Automated differential leucocyte counters: an evaluation of the Hemalog D and A comparison with the Hematrak. I. Principles of operation; reproducibility and accuracy on normal blood samples. Pathology 1980; 12: 83-100.

  43. Cox CJ, Habermann TM, Payne BA, Klee GG, Pierre RV. Evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus IV. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 84: 297-306.

  44. van Wersch JW, Bank C. A new development in haematological cell counting: the Sysmex NE-8000, automaton for cell count and physical five-part leukocyte differentiation. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1990; 28: 233-240.

  45. Buttarello M, Gadotti M, Lorenz C, Toffalori E, Ceschini N, Valentini A, et al. Evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers. A comparative study of differential counts (imprecision and inaccuracy). Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 97:345-352.

  46. Cornbleet PJ, Myrick D, Levy R. Evaluation of the Coulter STKS five-part differential. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 99: 72- 81.

  47. Davis BH, Bigelow NC. Performance evaluation of a hematology blood counter with five-part leukocyte differential capability. Am Clin Lab 1999; 18: 8-9.

  48. Pierre RV. Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential. Clin Lab Med 2002; 22: 279-297.

  49. Laharrague PF, Fillola G, Corberand JX. Evaluation of a new haematology analyser for whole blood count and full differential (NE-8000). Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 1992; 34: 303-307.

  50. Buttarello M, Bulian P, Temporin V, Rizzotti P. Sysmex SE-9000 hematology analyzer: performance evaluation on leukocyte differential counts using an NCCLS H20-A protocol. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 108: 674-686.

  51. Peng L, Gao X, Jiang H, Peng Z, Su J. Laboratory evaluation of the Sysmex SE-9500 automated haematology analyser. Clin Lab Haematol 2001; 23: 237-242.

  52. Billett HH, Simson E, Main P, Bailey C, Guerra P. The MAXM hematology autoanalyzer. An alternative? Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102: 36-44.

  53. Fialon P, Becker M, Boisseau MR. Evaluation of the white blood cell differential given by the new analyser Coulter STKS in both hematological and non-hematological patient groups. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1990; 38: 743-748.

  54. Flanagan P, Lane AM, Delamare A, Briggs CJ, McCarthy DA. An evaluation of the Cell-Dyn 1000. Clin Lab Haematol 1987; 9: 313-320.

  55. Fournier M, Gireau A, Chretien MC, Ghevaert C, Boniface B, Goudemand J, et al. Laboratory evaluation of the Abbott Cell DYN 3500 5-part differential. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 105: 286-292.

  56. Van den Bossche J, Devreese K, Malfait R, Van de Vyvere M, Wauters A, Neeis H, et al. Reference intervals for a complete blood count determined on different automated haematology analysers: Abx Pentra 120 Retic, CoulterGen-S, Sysmex SE 9500, Abbott Cell Dyn 4000 and Bayer Advia 120. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40: 69-73.

  57. Bourner G, Dhaliwal J, Sumner J. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study. Lab Hematol 2005; 11: 285-297.

  58. Harris N, Jou JM, Devoto G, Lotz J, Pappas J, Wranovics D, et al. Performance evaluation of the ADVIA 2120 hematology analyzer: an international multicenter clinical trial. Lab Hematol 2005; 11: 62-70.

  59. Lacombe F, Lacoste L, Vial JP, Briais A, Reiffers J, Boisseau MR, et al. Automated reticulocyte counting and immature reticulocyte fraction measurement. Comparison of ABX PENTRA 120 Retic, Sysmex R-2000, flow cytometry, and manual counts. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 112: 677- 686.

  60. Buttarello M, Temporin V, Ceravolo R, Farina G, Bulian P. The new reticulocyte parameter (RET-Y) of the Sysmex XE 2100: its use in the diagnosis and monitoring of posttreatment ideropenic anemia. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121: 489-495.

  61. Canals C, Remacha AF, Sarda MP, Piazuelo JM, Royo MT, Romero MA. Clinical utility of the new Sysmex XE 2100 parameter - reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent - in the diagnosis of anemia. Haematologica 2005; 90: 1133-1134.

  62. Field D, Taube E, Heumann S. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2006; 12: 11-14.

  63. Endoh A, Yagihashi A, Asanuma K, Moriai R, Izawa A, Koyanagi Y, et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell counts performed by the Sysmex SE-9000 analyzer can guide timing of peripheral blood stem cell harvest. Anticancer Res 2001; 21: 601-604.

  64. Ansari-Lari MA, Kickler TS, Borowitz MJ. Immature granulocyte measurement using the Sysmex XE-2100. Relationship to infection and sepsis. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120: 795-799.

  65. Letestu R, Marzac C, Audat F, Belhocine R, Tondeur S, Baccini V, et al. Use of hematopoietic progenitor cell count on the Sysmex XE-2100 for peripheral blood stem cell harvest monitoring. Leuk Lymphoma 2007; 48: 89-96.

  66. Gulati G, Behling E, Kocher W, Schwarting R. An evaluation of the performance of Sysmex XE-2100 in enumerating nucleated red cells in peripheral blood. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 1077-1083.

  67. Briggs C, Kunka S, Hart D, Oguni S, Machin SJ. Assessment of an immature platelet fraction (IPF) in peripheral thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 2004; 126: 93-99.

  68. McCabe DJ, Harrison P, Sidhu PS, Brown MM, Machin SJ. Circulating reticulated platelets in the early and late phases after ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Br J Haematol 2004; 126: 861-869.

  69. Kickler TS, Oguni S, Borowitz MJ. A clinical evaluation of high fluorescent platelet fraction percentage in thrombocytopenia. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 125: 282-287.

  70. Abe Y, Wada H, Tomatsu H, Sakaguchi A, Nishioka J, Yabu Y, et al. A simple technique to determine thrombopoiesis level using immature platelet fraction (IPF). Thromb Res 2006; 118: 463-469.

  71. Wever PC, Henskens YM, Kager PA, Dankert J, van Gool T. Detection of imported malaria with the Cell-Dyn 4000 hematology analyzer. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 4729- 4731.

  72. Huh J, Jung J, Yoon H, Chung W. Pseudoeosinophilia associated with malaria infection determined in the Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer. Ann Hematol 2005; 84:400-402.

  73. van der Meer W, Dinnissen J, Keijzer MH. Evaluation of the Sysmex XT-2000i, a new automated haematology analyser. Sysmex J Intern 2002; 12: 71-75.

  74. Ruzicka K, Veitl M, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Schwarzinger I. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125: 391-396.

  75. Kim YR, Yee M, Metha S, Chupp V, Kendall R, Scott CS. Simultaneous differentiation and quantitation of erythroblasts and white blood cells on a high throughput clinical haematology analyser. Clin Lab Haematol 1998; 20: 21-29.

  76. Johannessen B, Roemer B, Flatmoen L, Just T, Aarsand AK, Scott CS. Implementation of monoclonal antibody fluorescence on the Abbott CELL-DYN Sapphire haematology analyser: evaluation of lymphoid, myeloid and platelet markers. Clin Lab Haematol 2006; 28: 84-96.

  77. Peterson P, Blomberg DJ, Rabinovitch A, Cornbleet PJ, Hematology and Clinical Microscopy Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Physician review of the peripheral blood smear: when and why. An opinion. Lab Hematol 2001; 7: 157-179.

  78. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ISH): Expert Panel on Cytometry. Recommendations of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology for ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anticoagulation of blood for blood cell counting and sizing. Am J Clin Pathol1993; 100: 371-372.

  79. Houwen B. Blood film preparation and staining procedures. Lab Hematol 2000; 6: 1-7.

  80. Hayashi M, Gauthier S, Tatsumi N. Evaluation of an automated slide preparation and staining unit. Sysmex J Intern1996; 6: 63-69.

  81. Sandhaus L, Dillman C, Clement R, Losh D. Errors in the hematology laboratory: why do they occur and what can we do to reduce them? Lab Hematol 2004; 10: 197-199.

  82. Dalal BI, Brigden ML. Artifacts that may be present on a blood film. Clin Lab Med 2002; 22: 81-100, vi.

  83. Rogers CH. Blood sample preparation for automated differential systems. Am J Med Technol 1973; 39: 435-442.

  84. Bacus JW. Erythrocyte morphology and centrifugal “spinner” blood film preparations. J Histochem Cytochem 1974; 22: 506-516.

  85. Megla GK. Automatic blood film preparation by rheologically controlled spinning. Am J Med Technol 1976; 42:336-342.

  86. May JA, Sage BH. Spinner films for reticulocyte counts. Am J Med Technol 1976; 42: 357-360.

  87. Wolley RC, Dembitzer HM, Herz F, Schreiber K, Koss LG. The use of a slide spinner in the analysis of cell dispersion. J Histochem Cytochem 1976; 24: 11-15.

  88. ICSH reference method for staining of blood and bone marrow films by azure B and eosin Y (Romanowsky stain). International Committee for Standardization in Haematology. Br J Haematol 1984; 57: 707-710.

  89. Woronzoff-Dashkoff KP. The Ehrlich-Chenzinsky-Plehn-Malachowski-Romanowsky-Nocht-Jenner-May-Grünwald-Leishman-Reuter-Wright-Giemsa-Lillie-Roe-Wilcox stain. The mystery unfolds. Clin Lab Med 1993; 13: 759-771.

  90. Marshall PN. Romanowsky-type stains in haematology. Histochem J 1978; 10: 1-29.

  91. Woronzoff-Dashkoff KK. The Wright-Giemsa stain. Secrets revealed. Clin Lab Med 2002; 22: 15-23.

  92. Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 498-507.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com