medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2009, Number 06

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2009; 77 (06)

Técnicas de marcaje con guía ultrasonográfica y mastográfica previas a la obtención de biopsia de mama por escisión

Navari GF, Ortíz IMC, Zúñiga LDS

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 261-269
PDF size: 436.30 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Breast cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. Localization under ultrasound guidance or mammography prior to biopsy is one of the procedures used for diagnosis of subclinical malignant or premalignant lesions.
Objective: To describe techniques for localization by mammography or ultrasound at our institution, prior to excisional breast biopsy.
Material and methods: Localization under ultrasound guidance or mammography from July 1 to December 31, 2008 at the Hospital Angeles del Pedregal. An analysis of the category BIRADS, histopathologic results, the imaging procedure and the surgical approach.
Results: We made 78 procedures. 56% under mammography guidance and 44% by ultrasound. 23% of biopsies with histopathological result of malignancy and 77% were benign, the outcome depended on the category of BIRADS granted. Success depends on the technique of covering the lesion in its entirety and was 100% in our study.
Conclusions: Localization of nonpalpable lesions of the breast remains a useful procedure for diagnosis of suspicious lesions. The choice of the imaging technique depends on the characteristics of the lesion under study.


REFERENCES

  1. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(14):2137-50.

  2. Hernández CN, Sandoval GF, Hernández GM, Torres LA, y col. Lesiones de mama no palpables sospechosas de malignidad. Correlación radiológica-quirúrgica (Hospital General de México). Gamo 2007;6:2:42-46.

  3. Althius MD, Dozier JM, Anderson WF. Devesa SS, Brinton LA. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973-1997. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:405-12.

  4. Cerrato NA, López RL, Ortiz IC. Correlación radiológicapatológica de las biopsias de mama realizadas en el Centro Médico ABC. An Radiol Mex 2005;4:305-10.

  5. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225(1):165-75.

  6. Vargas-Ocampo G, Pérez-Reyes M, Mendoza-Gutiérrez M. Correlación diagnóstica con ultrasonido y resonancia magnética en la detección de cáncer de mama en estudios de mastografía, categorías III, IV y V de la clasificación ACR-BIRADS. Rev Sanid Milit Mex 2005;59(5):288-98.

  7. Berg WA, Gutiérrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233(3):830-49.

  8. Bassett L, Winchester DP, Caplan RB, Dershaw DD, et al. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists.. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:171-90.

  9. Souba WW, Fink PM, Jurkovich JG, Kaiser PL, et al. Breast procedures. ACS Surgery: principles and practice. 3rd ed. New York: WebMD, 2004;pp5:1-15.

  10. Fornage BD, Ross MI, Singletary SE, Paulus DD. Localization of impalpable breast masses: Value of sonography in the operating room and scanning of excised specimens. AJR Am J Roetgenol 1994;163:569-73.

  11. Dershaw DD. Stereotactic biopsy: equipment, devices and technique. Breast imaging: RSNA Categorical course in diagnostic radiology, 2005;pp:49-54.

  12. Kopans DB. Interventional procedures in the breast. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2007;pp:890-975.

  13. Comstock CE. US-guided interventional procedures. In: Feig SA, ed. Cetegorical course in diagnostic radiology breast imaging. Oakland: Radiological Society of North America, 2005;pp:155-68.

  14. Gittleman MA. Single-step ultrasound localization of breast lesions and lumpectomy procedure. Am J Surg 2003;186:386-90.

  15. Cheung YC, Wan YL, Lo YF, Leung WM, et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation for breast cancers after sonographically guided core-needle biopsy: a comparison study. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:756-61.

  16. Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999;211:845-50.

  17. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: False-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210(3):799-805.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com