medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2010, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2010; 52 (1)

Stimulation at home and motor development among 36 month-old Mexican children

Osorio E, Torres-Sánchez L, Hernández MC, López-Carrillo L, Schnaas L

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 14-22
PDF size: 138.26 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To identify the relationship between stimulation at home and motor development among 36 month-old children. Materials and Methods. The development of gross and fine motor skills of 169 infants (50.9% boys and 49.1% girls) was assessed at the age of 36 months with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale. The quality of home stimulation was determined during a prior evaluation (at 30 months) by means of the HOME Scale. Results. Total stimulation at home was significantly associated with better performance in the gross and fine motor areas. Particular aspects of this home stimulation were related to better gross and fine motor functions. Conclusion. Static balance and locomotion (gross motor skills) and grasping and visual-motor integration (fine motor skills) are associated with particular aspects of home stimulation , such as parent-child interaction, verbal reinforcement of the child’s positive actions and providing the child with clear boundaries.


REFERENCES

  1. Black MM, Baqui AH, Zaman K, McNary SW, Le K, Arifeen SE, et al. Depressive symptoms among rural Bangladeshi mothers: implications for infant development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007;48:764-772.

  2. Kolobe TH, Bulanda M, Susman L. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Ther 2004;84:1144-1156.

  3. Burchinal MR, Roberts JE, Riggin R Jr, Zeisel SA, Neebe E, Bryant D. Relating quality of center-based child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally. Child Dev 2000;71:339-357.

  4. Lejarraga H, Pascucci M, Krupitzky S, Kelmansky D, Bianco A, Martínez E, et al. Psychomotor development in Argentinean children aged 0-5 years. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:47-60.

  5. Papalia D. Psicología del desarrollo. Santa Fé de Bogotá, Colombia: Mc.Graw-Hill, 1992.

  6. Handal AJ, Lozoff B, Breilh J, Harlow SD. Sociodemographic and nutritional correlates of neurobehavioral development: a study of young children in a rural region of Ecuador. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2007;21:292-300.

  7. De Barros KM, Fragoso AG, de Oliveira AL, Cabral-Filho JE, de Castro RM. Do environmental influences alter motor abilities acquisition? A comparison among children from day-care centers and private schools. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61:170-175.

  8. Ruiz L. Desarrollo motor y actividades físicas. Madrid España: Gymnos, 1987.

  9. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Tjus T, Nekkebroeck J, Squires J, Verté D, Heimann M, et al. Psychological follow-up study of 5-year-old ICSI children. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2791-2797

  10. Soler K, Rivera I, Figueroa M, Sánchez L, Sánchez M. Relación entre las características del ambiente psicosocial en el hogar y el desarrollo psicomotor en el niño menor a 36 meses de edad. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2007; 64:273-287.

  11. Mendelsohn A, Mogilner L, Dreyer B, Forman J, Weinstein S, Broderick M, et al. The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children. Pediatrics 2001;107(1):130-134.

  12. Torralva T, Cugnasco I, Manso M, Sauton F, Ferrero M, O´Donnell A, et al. Desarrollo mental y motor en los primeros años de vida: su relación con la estimulación ambiental y el nivel socio-económico. Arch Argent Pediatr 1999;97:306-316.

  13. INEGI/IMSS. Encuesta Nacional de Empleo y Seguridad Social 2004. [Consultado septiembre 13 2009]. Disponible en: www.inegi.gob.mx

  14. Ontiveros E, Cravioto J, Sánchez C, Barragán G. Evaluación del desarrollo motor en función de género, estimulación disponible en el hogar y nivel socioeconómico en niños de 0 a 3 años de edad del área rural. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2000;57;311-319.

  15. Torres-Sanchez L, Rothenberg SJ, Schnaas L, Cebrian ME, Osorio E, Hernandez M, et al. In utero p,p’-DDE exposure and infant neurodevelopment: a perinatal cohort in Mexico. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:435-439.

  16. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2). Second Edition. Austin Texas: Pro-ed Inc., 2000.

  17. Caldwell BM, Bradley R. Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment. Littlerock AR: University of Arkansas, 1984.

  18. Riou E, Chosh S, Francoeur E, Shevell M. Global development delay and its relationship to cognitive skills. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2009;51:(3)600-606.

  19. CoolsN, De Martelaer K, Samaey C, Andries C. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. Journal of sports science and medicine 2008;8:154-168.

  20. Mayrand L, Mazer B, Menard S, Chilingaryan G. Screening for motor deficits using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory(PED) in children with language impairment. Dev Neurorehabil 2009;12(3):139-145.

  21. Chi-Wen Ch, Bond T. Measurement properties of fine motor scale of Peabody development motor scales second edition. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009;88(5):376-386.

  22. Provost B, Heimerl S, Lopez B. Levels of gross and fine motor development in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2007;27(3):21-36.

  23. Wechsler D. WAIS-Español Escala de Inteligencia para Adultos. México DF: Manual Moderno, 1981.

  24. Moraleda M. Psicología del desarrollo. México DF: Alfaomega, 1999.

  25. Gillette EA, Meza MM, Aguilar MG, Soto AD, García IE. An antropological approach to the evaluation of preschool children exposed to pesticides in Mexico. Environ Health Perspect 1998;106:347-353.

  26. Slee P. Child, adolescent and family development. Second edition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2002:133

  27. De Andraca I, Pino P, de la Parra A, Rivera F. Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo psicomotor en lactantes nacidos en óptimas condiciones biológicas. Rev Saude Publica 1998; 32: 479-487.

  28. Eickmann S, Cabral-de Lira P, De Carvalho M, Bechara S, Pérez M, et al. Breast feeding and mental and motor development at 12 months in a low-income population in northeast Brazil. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:129-137.

  29. Emond A, Lira P, Lima M, Grantham S, Ashworth A. Development and behavior of low-birthweight term infants at 8 years in northeast Brazil: A longitudinal study. Acta Pediatrica 2006;95:1249-1257.

  30. Thelen E. Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. Int J Behav Dev 2000; 24(4): 385-397.

  31. Lima MC, Eickmann SH, Lima ACV, Guerra MQ, Lira PIC, Hunttly SRA, et al. Determinants of mental and motor development at 12 months in a low income population: a cohort study in northeast Brazil. Acta Pediatr 2004;93: 969-975.

  32. Anme T, Uma AS. Implications of Japan´s center-based night care a 1 year follow-up. Early Childhood Educ J 2007;35:293-299.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com