medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2006, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2006; 66 (4)

Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy. Hand assisted versus pure

Marquina M, Esquivel P, García F, López VG, Muñiz S

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 162-167
PDF size: 149.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

With the use of laparoscopic, the number of patients who are put under this surgical technique, in procedures has been increased where previously the open surgery was the only option. The nephrectomy made for renal transplant of live donors is not the exception. In “pure” laparoscopic, the minimum of manipulation exists, is comfortable for the surgeon and the dissection is cleaner, but it requires ability and experience. With the laparoscopic nephrectomy attended with the hand the advantages are: better direction, facility to touch, to be able to dissect or to separate with the hand taking a smaller surgical time and security in important bleed case. The objective of the work was the accomplishment of descriptive, comparative and analytical study between nephrectomy laparoscopic attended with the hand (NDLAM) versus pure laparoscopic (NDLP). For their analysis, ave-rages and percentage were used as well as tstudent in the inference analysis.


REFERENCES

  1. Schweitzer EJ, et al. Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:32.

  2. Ratner LE, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:3402.

  3. Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy after seven years. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:896.

  4. Stephen C, Jacobs, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6 year experience. J Urol. 2004;171:47.

  5. Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:1270.

  6. Stifelman MD, Hull D, Sosa RE, Su LM, Hyman M, Stubenbord W, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach. J Urol. 2001;166:444.

  7. Pace KT, Dyer SJ, Phan V, Stewart RJ, Honey RJ, Poulin EC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endoscop. 2003;17:134.

  8. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2018-21.

  9. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Trasplant Proc. 1997; 29:138.

  10. Nongueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, Schweitzer E, Wiland A, Klassen DK, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1999;67: 722.

  11. Wolf JS, Merion RM, Leightman AB, Campbell DA, Magee JC, Punch JD, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2001; 72:284.

  12. Marquina SM, Esquivel PP, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus open nephrectomy. Rev Mex Urol. 2003;63(3):91-4.

  13. Kuo PC, Johnson LB, Sitzmann JV. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with a 23-hour stay: a new standard for transplantation surgery. Ann Surg. 2000; 231:772.

  14. El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA. Donor nephrectomy: A comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;171(1):40-3.

  15. Sidney C, Abreu, et al. Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;171:52.

  16. Kercher KW, Joels CS, Matthews BD, Lincourt AE, Smith TI, Heniford BT. Hand-assisted surgery improves outcomes for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Am Surg. 2003;69(12):1061-6.

  17. Hayakawa K, Aoyagi T, Ohashi M, Hata M. Comparison of Gas-less laparoscopy-assisted surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and pure laparoscopic surgery for radical nephrectomy. Inter J Urol. 2004; 11(3):142-7.

  18. Memon MA, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a useful technique for complex laparoscopic abdominal procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;8:143.

  19. Boorjian, Stephen I, Munver R, Sosa E, Del Pizzo J. Right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a single institution experience. Transplantation. 2004;77 (3): 437-40.

  20. Chan D, Bishop JT, Ratner L, et al. Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: early recognition and management. J Urol. 2000;164:319.

  21. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, Bellman GC, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology. 2002;60:415.

  22. Gaston KE, Moore DT, Pruthi RS. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve. J Urol. 2004;171(1):63-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com