Ysunza-Rivera A, Landeros L, Pamplona MC, Silva-Rojas JA, Prado-Calleros HM, Fajardo-Dolci GE

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 303-308
PDF size: 49.37 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Several pathologies can involve muscles that control vocal folds. The abnormality can affect peripheral nerves or central nervous system centers. Clinically, muscle function can be assessed by observing the movement of structures themselves or by recording electrical activity of these muscles using (electromyography- EMG). Since EMG is an invasive technique, its use is not very widespread in the diagnosis and management of voice disorders, Laryngeal EMG can be helpful in those patients with voice problems of suspected neurological or neuromuscular etiology.
Objective: Assess the role of laryngeal EMG in the clinical evaluation of unilateral vocal cord immobility.
Methods: Twenty-five patients with unilateral vocal cord paralysis were studied. Twenty-five patients with unilateral arytenoid dislocation were studied as controls. The sensitivity and specificity of the EMG as a diagnostic marker for vocal fold paralysis were obtained.
Results: Laryngeal EMG showed a 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Only two patients displaying arytenoid dislocation displayed abnormal EMG recordings.
Conclusions: EMG constitutes a safe and reliable tool to aid the evaluation of patients with vocal fold immobility. EMG recordings were helpful in differentiating vocal cord paralysis from arytenoid dislocation. Moreover, EMG can provide useful data regarding denervation and reinnervation of laryngeal muscles. Aside from its diagnostic usefulness, serial EMG can help to monitor recovery and establish a reliable prognosis. Hence, an adequate treatment plan can be determined.

REFERENCES

1. Ballenger JJ. Neurologic diseases of the larynx. En: Ballenger JJ, editor. Diseases of the nose, throat, ear, head, and neck. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985.

2. Colton R, Casper JK. Understanding voice problems. Baltimore: Williams & Willkins; 1996.

3. Brazis P, Masdeu J, Biller J. Localization in clinical neurology. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Willkins; 2001.

4. Schaefer SD. Laryngeal electromiography. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991; 24:1053-1057.

5. Kimaid PA, Crespo AN, Quagliato EM. Laryngeal EMG: contribution to vocal fold immobility diagnosis. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004;44:371-414.

6. Yin SS, Qui WW, Stucker FJ. Mayor patterns of laryngeal EMG and their clinical application. Laryngoscope 1997;107:126-136.

7. Simpson DM, Sternman D, Graves-Wright J, Sanders I. Vocal cord paralysis: clinical and electrophysiological features. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:952-957.

8. Yin SS, Qui WW, Stuker FJ. Value of electromyography in differential diagnosis of laryngeal joint injuries after intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:446-451.

9. Nierenberg AA, Feinstein AR. How to evaluate a diagnostic marker test. Lessons for the rise and fall of the desamethasone supresión test. JAMA 1988;259:446-451.

10. Ysunza A, Pamplona M, Molina F. Velopharyngeal motion following sphincter pharyngoplasty. A videonasopharyngoscopic and electromyographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:905-910.

11. Ysunza A. Fisiología de músculos faríngeos posterior a restauración quirúrgica del esfínter velofaríngeo. Gac Med Mex 2005;141:195-199.

12. Trigos I, Ysunza A, Vargas D. The Sanvenero Rosselli pharyngoplasty: an electromyographic study. Cleft Palate J 1988;25:385-390.

13. Stalberg E. Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit action potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 1986;3:313-349.

14. Ysunza A, Pamplona M. Velopharyngeal function alter two different types of pharyngoplasty. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:1031-1037.

15. Rossner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury, Thompson Learning; 2000.

16. Feinstein A. Multivariate analysis. New Heaven: Yale University Press; 1997.

17. Halum SL, Patel N, Smith TL. Laryngeal electromyography for unilateral vocal fold immobility: a survey of the American Bronco-Esophageal-Association. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114:425-428.

18. Ysunza A, Landeros L, Pamplona M, Prado H, Arrieta J, Fajardo G. The role of laryngeal electromyography in the diagnosis of vocal fold immobility in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:949-958.

19. Scott AR, Chong PS, Randolph GW, Hartnick CJ. Intraoperative laryngeal electromyography in children with vocal fold immobility: a simplified technique. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72:31-40.

20. Lee J, Sung IY, Park JH, Roh JL. Recurrent nerve neuropathy in a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patient. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:68-70.

21. Merati AI, Halum SL, Smith TL. Diagnostic testing for vocal fold paralysis: a survey of practice and evidence based medicine review. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1539-1552.

22. Isham SL, Halum SL, Patel NJ, Kershner JE, Meratin AL. Magenament of vocal paralysis: a comparison of adult and pediatric practices. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:590-594.

23. Feinstein A. Clinical epidemiology. The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985.

24. Yin SS, Qui WW, Stuker FJ. Mayor patterns of laryngeal electromyography and their clinical application. Laryngoscope 1997;107:126-136.

25. Koufman JA, Postma GN, Whang CS. Diagnostic laryngeal EMG: The Forrest experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:603-606.