García-Olivera GÁ, Guevara-Ortigoza MP, Aguirre-Reyes MH, Pérez-Hernández E

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 184-190
PDF size: 53.74 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To demonstrate sevoflurane´s usefulness as a general anesthetic for orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Material and methods: We include 50 patients from 18 to 65 years old, they underwent to removal of ostheosynthesis material, capture and application of skin allograft, shoulder mobilization, wrist tunnel liberation, closed reduction of the shoulder and pulley release. Heart rate, blood pressure and hemoglobin oxygen saturation were measured at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 minutes. Statistical analysis with analysis of variance and t Student. Results: The induction were measured with loss of command response: 62 seconds, loss of eye lash reflex: 79 seconds, and press loss in 100 seconds. The maintenance showed haemodynamic stability. This was mostly reflected in the heart rate. The Emersion was observed in 7.71 minutes. Conclusions: Due to its characteristics, sevoflurane is the most suitable inhaled anesthetic for handling patients on orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Obtained cardiovascular stability evidence is benefic and it covers security requirements for the ambulatory patient.

REFERENCES

1. Beverly KP. ¿Cuáles son los mejores agentes para la anestesia ambulatoria general; son estos agentes costo-efectivos? Anestesia Ambulatoria 1996:1-21.

2. Matute E, Alsina E, Roses R, Blanc G, Perez C y cols. Bolo inhalatorio de sevoflurano frente a bolo intravenoso de remifentanyl para el control de las respuestas hemodinámicas al estrés quirúrgico durante la cirugía mayor: ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1217-22.

3. Fredman B, Nathanson M, Smith I, Wang J, Klein K, et al. Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: A comparison with propofol. Anesth Analg 1995;81:823-28.

4. Castagnini E. Inducción inhalatoria con sevoflurano en adultos. Biblioteca práctica de Abbott. Laboratorios Argentina 2004.

5. Jellish S, Lien C, Fontenot J, Hall R. The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesth Analg 1996;82:479-485.

6. Edmon E, Weiskopf R. Historia de los anestésicos inhalados modernos en farmacología de los anestésicos inhalados; Editorial Intersistemas S.A de C.V, México, D.F., 2002.pp 1-6.

7. Sloan M, Conard P, Karsunky P, Gross J. Sevoflurane versus isoflurane: Induction and recovery characteristics with single-breath inhaled inductions of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1996;82:528-32.

8. Beverly P, Surinder K, Martin B, Scheller M, Wetchler B. A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1996;83:314-9.

9. Matute E, López J. Caracterización de los efectos de sevoflurano sobre la transmisión somatomotora espinal nociceptiva y no nociceptiva en médula espinal de ratas recién nacidas: Un estudio electrofisiológico in vitro. Neuropharmacology 2003;44:811-816.

10. Beverly P, Lombard L, Roaf E, Drager L, Calalang I y cols. Comparación entre la inducción inhalatoria por capacidad vital, con sevoflurano, y la inducción intravenosa con propofol, para la anestesia ambulatoria en adultos. Anesth Analg 1999;89:623-7.

11. Ashworth J, Smith I. Comparison of desflurane with isoflurane or propofol in spontaneously breathing ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg 1998;87:312-8.

12. Baerdemaeker L, Struys M, Jacobs S, Den Blauwen N, Bossuyt G, et al. Optimization of desflurane administration in morbidly obese patients: a comparison with sevoflurane using an inhalation bolus technique. Br J Anesth 2003;91:638-50.