2006, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Oftalmol 2006; 80 (3)
Evaluación del campo visual en pacientes diabéticos tratados con fotocoagulación panretiniana
Flores-Peredo V, Robredo-Torres V, Graue-Wiechers F
Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 116-125
PDF size: 780.51 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Panretinal photocoagulation has been the mainstay of treatment for diabetic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Purpose: To evaluate the visual field in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy after panretinal photocoagulation.
Methods: We included 20 eyes of 16 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy with best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or better, clear media, a reliable Humphrey visual field, angiography and stereoscopic photographs before laser treatment.
We excluded patients with glaucoma, unreliable visual field test, and best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse. We performed panretinal photocoagulation in 2 sessions of 900 spots, the first one in the inferior half and the second in the superior one. Follow-up was at 6 and 9 weeks after treatment, with angiography and visual field test.
Conclusions: Photocoagulation in patients with diabetic retinopathy must be individualized. Diabetic retinopathy evolution has a direct influence in the visual field damage parallel to laser application.
REFERENCES
Joyce E, Douglas S. Ophthalmologic emergencies in the patient with diabetes. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics 2000; 29(4).
Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE y col. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy when age and diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophtalmol 1984; 102:520-526.
Early Teatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. ETDRS Report No 1.: Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophtalmol 1985; 103:1796-1806.
Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy. Am J Ophtalmol 1976; 81:383-396.
Mainster MA. Laser effects for clinicians. Ophtalmology 1984; 91(7):886-888.
Bonafonte S, García CA. Retinopatía diabética. Harcourt. Cap 6.
Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. DRS. Report No 8. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy clinical applications of DRS findings. Ophtalmology 1981; 88:583-600.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group ETDRS Report No 7. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study design and baseline patient characteristics. Ophtalmology 1991; 98:741-756.
Doft BH, Blankenship GW. Single versus multiple treatment sessions of argon laser panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophtalmology 1982; 89:772-779.
Frank RN. Visual fields and electroretinography following extensive photocoagulation. Arch Ophtalmol 1975; 93:591-598.
Hulbert MF, Vernon SA. Passing the DVLC field regulations following bilateral pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetics. Eye 1992; 6:456-460.
Panel de Expertos en Glaucoma. Lineamientos y recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del glaucoma. 2001. Aavalado por AMG, SMO, APAO.
Bell J, Feldon S. retinal microangiopathy. Correlation of octopus perimetry with fluorescein angiography. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1294-1298.
Greite JH, Zumbansen HP, Adamczyk R. Visual field in diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophtalmol Proc Ser 1981; 94:747-754.
Wisznia KI, Lieberman TW, Leopold IH. Visual fields in diabetic retinopathy. Brit J Ophtalmol 1971; 55:183-188.
Trick GL, Trick LR, Kilo Ch. Visual field defects in patients with insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Ophtalmology 1990; 97(4): 475-482.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy ETDRS Report No 9. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:766-85.
Buckley S, Jenkins L, Benjamin L. Fields, DVLC and panretinal photocoagulation. Eye 1992; 6:623-5.
Nigel D. Can altering the pattern of laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy help retain visual fields for driving? Eye 199(13):531-536.
Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Johnson CA, Weinreb RN. Current practice with standard automated perimetry. Seminars in Ophthalmology 2000; 15(4):172-181.
Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spillers W. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: Fast Pac, Sita Standard and Sita Fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2001; 279:23-33.