­
medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)

2008, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2008; 30 (2)

Incidence of mechanical complications during placement of intravascular access devices for the administration of parenteral nutrition

Hurtado TGF, Meléndez MG

Language: Spanish
References: 51
Page: 78-83
PDF size: 78.96 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the incidence of mechanical complications associated to the placement of central venous catheters for the administration of parenteral nutrition therapy in adult patients.
Setting: Clinical Nutrition Service, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí.
Design: Prospective, descriptive, and observational.
Statistical analysis: Frequency distribution for categorical variables and Mantel-Haenszel test.
Material and methods: We recorded the demographic characteristics of the patients and their diagnoses, as well as the mechanical complications associated to the placement of intravascular devices for parenteral nutrition therapy.
Results: We studied 80 procedures for the placement of central venous catheters in 71 patients. Indications for parenteral nutrition therapy were: neoplasms (36.8%), entero-cutaneous fistulas (18.3%), abdominal sepsis (9.8%), intestinal inflammatory disease (8.4%), acute pancreatitis (7.0%), short bowel syndrome (4.2%), and other diverse pathologies (15.4%). Mechanical complications were encountered in 17/80 procedures (21.3%) and in 17/71 patients (23.9%). The types of complications were: arterial punctures (44.4%), hematomas (37.0%), misplacement of the intravascular device (14.8%), and hemorrhages (3.7%) Risk factors for the occurrence of mechanical complications were poor nutritional status (p=0.02) and the number of punctures in attempting to cannulate the vessel (p= 0.007)
Conclusions: We found a significant incidence of mechanical complications associated to the placement of central venous catheters for the administration of parenteral nutrition therapy. A strict and controlled supervision is required to avoid potential complications.


REFERENCES

  1. ASPEN. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN 1993; 17: 1SA-32SA.

  2. Task Force for the Revision of Safe Practice for Parenteral Nutrition. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition. JPEN 2004; 26: 36S-41S.

  3. Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K. Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data and recommendations for future research. JPEN 1997; 21: 133-156.

  4. Nehme A. Nutritional Support of the Hospitalized patient. JAMA 1980; 243: 1906-1908.

  5. Maloo M, Forse A. Rombeau Parenteral nutrition. WB Saunders. Philadelphia 2001: 157-171.

  6. Shils M, Brown R. Modern nutrition in health and disease. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999: 1657-1688.

  7. Culebras J, García-de-Lorenzo A, Zarazaga A, Jorquera F. Parenteral nutrition. WB Saunders. Philadelphia 2001: 580-587.

  8. The Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Cooperative Study Group. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 525-532.

  9. Wolfe B, Ryden M, Nishikawa R. Complications of parenteral nutrition. Am J Surg 1986; 152: 93-99.

  10. Florvers J, Ryan J, Gough J, Fisher JE (ed). Total parenteral nutrition little brown and company. Boston 1991: 25-46.

  11. Padberg F, Ruggiero J, Blackburn G. Central venous catheterization for parenteral nutrition. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 264-270.

  12. Dudrick SJ, Willmore DW, Vars HM, et al. Long-term total parenteral nutrition with growth, development and positive nitrigen balance. Surgery 1968; 64: 134-142.

  13. Grant J. Parenteral Nutrition. WB Saunders. Philadelphia 2001: 109-117.

  14. Ryan AR, Abbott W, et al. Catheter complications in total parenteral nutrition. N Engl J Med 1974; 290: 757-761.

  15. Herbst Ch. Indications, management and complications of percutaneous subclavian catheters Arch Surg 1978; 113: 1421-1425.

  16. Mansfield P, Hohn D, Fornage B. Complications and failures of subclavian vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1735-1738.

  17. Scott W. Complications associated with central venous catheters. Chest 1988; 94: 1221-1224.

  18. Newsome H, Armstrong C, Mayhall G, et al. Mechanical complications from insertion of subclavian venous feeding catheters: comparison of de novo percutaneuos venipuncture to change over guidewire. JPEN 1984; 8: 560-562.

  19. Sznajder J, Zveibil F, Bitterman H. Central vein catheterization failure and complications rates by three percutaneuos approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146: 259-261.

  20. Reddy P, Malone M. Cost and outcome analysis of home parenteral and enteral nutrition. JPEN 1998; 22: 302-310.

  21. Conces D, Holden R. Aberrant locations and complications in initial placement of subclavian vein catheters Arch Surg 1984; 119: 293-295.

  22. McGee W, Ackerman B, Rouben L, et al. Accurate placement of central venous catheters: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 1993; 21: 1118-1123.

  23. Haire W, Lieberman R. Defining the risks of subclavian vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1735-1738.

  24. Gladwin M, Slonim A, Landucci D. Cannulation of the internal juglar vein: Is postprocedural chest radiography necessary? Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1819-1823.

  25. Duntley P, Siever J, Korwes ML. Vascular erosion by central venous catheters. Clinical features and outcome. Chest 1992; 101: 1633-1638.

  26. Hagley M, Martin B, Gast P. Infectious and mechanical complications of central venous catheters placed by percutaneuos venipuncture and over guidewires. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 1426-1430.

  27. Malenka D, Ross J. Perforation by central venous catheters: A new testament to and old test. JPEN 1998; 13: 309-311.

  28. Gray P, Sullivan G, Ostryzniuk P. Value of postprocedural chest radiograhpy in the adult intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 1513-1518.

  29. Strange CH. Pleural complications in the intensive care unit. Clinics in Chest Medicine 1999; 20: 317-327.

  30. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Barker JP. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN 1987; 11: 8-13.

  31. Santillan P, Corona H, Aranceta M. Morbimortality of intravenous central catheters at the National Institute of Nutrition Salvador Zubiran. Rev Invest Clin 1985; 37: 91-94.

  32. Ruesh S, Walder B, Tramer M. Complications of central venous catheters: internal yugular versus subclavian access: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 454-460.

  33. Polderman K, Girbes A. Central venous catheter use. Part I Mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1-17.

  34. Venwk V. The ins and outs of venous access: Part I. Nutr Clin Pract 2002;17:85-93

  35. 35 Walters G. Kahn A. Jescovitch A. Efficacy of a central venous access service South Med J 1997; 90: 37-9.

  36. Wesley JR. Nutrition support teams: past, present and future. Nutr Clin Pract 1995; 10: 219-28.

  37. Alpers D, Atenson W, Bier D. Manual of Nutritional Therapeutics. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia 2002: 347-396.

  38. Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P et al. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1417-1424.

  39. Fisher N, Mutimer D. Central venous cannulation in patients with liver disease and coagulopathy-a perspective audit. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 481-485.

  40. DeSancho M, Rand J. Bleeding and thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with cancer. Critical Care Clinics 2001; 17: 599-622.

  41. Doerfler M. Kaufman B. Goldenberg A. Central venous catheter placement in patients with disorders of hemostasis Chest 1996; 110: 185-188.

  42. DeChicco R, Seidner DL, Brun C, Steiger E, Stafford J, Lopez R. Tip position of long-term central venous access devices used for parenteral nutrition. JPEN 2007; 31: 382-387.

  43. Krzywda E, Andris D, Edmiston Ch, Wallace J. The ASPEN Nutrition support core curriculum: A case-based approach—the adult patient. American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Silver Spring MD. 2007: 300-321.

  44. Scott W. Central venous catheters. an overview of Food and Drug Administration activities Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1995; 4: 377-393.

  45. Intravenous Nurses Society. Intravenous Nursing. Standards of practice. J Intraven Nurs 1998; 21: S1-S91.

  46. Cullinane DC, Parkus DE, Reddy VS, et al. The futility of chest roentgenograms following routine central venous line changes. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 283-285.

  47. Riblet JL, Shillinglaw W, Goldberg AJ. Utility of the routine chest X-ray after “overwire” venous catheter changes. Am Surg 1996; 62: 1064-106.

  48. Amshel CE, Palesty JA, Dudrick SJ. Are chest X-rays mandatory following central venous catheterization over a wire. Am Surg 1998; 64: 499-50.

  49. Vincent JL. Hemodynamic support in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: S80-S92.

  50. Krzywda EA, Andris DA. Twenty-five years of advances in vascular access: bridging research to clinical practice Nutr Clin Pract 2005; 20: 597-606.

  51. Grant, John P. Anatomy and physiology of venous system vascular access: Implications JPEN 2006; 30: S7-12.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

    Este sitio utiliza cookies   Estoy de acuerdo