2004, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2004; 27 (4)
Efficacy in the use of small volumes vs large volumes of local anesthetic for the brachial plexus
Zaragoza-Lemus G, Sánchez-Velasco B, Pantoja-Herrera M
Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 191-195
PDF size: 65.87 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Once in the axillary region, the branches of the brachial plexus spread apart. This spreading may be taken advantage of by using large volumes of local anesthetic to obtain a uniform blockade, with a better success rate.
bjective: To compare the use of small volumes vs large volumes of local anesthetic to reach complete sensitive and motor blockade for hand surgery.
Methods: One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for hand surgery, ASA class I-II-E, were divided into two groups. Patients in group I received a small volume of local anesthetic (40 ml). Patients in group II received a volume according to their weight (1 ml/kg body weight), which was considered a large volume. An external observer blind recorded the effectiveness in terms of motor and sensitive blockade and its side effects, both in the operating room and in the post-anesthetics care unit.
Results: Complete anesthesia was obtained in 78% of patients in Group I vs 96% in Group II. Motor blockade was longer in Group II (p ‹ 0.005). Vital signs remained within safe ranges.
Conclusion: Large volumes of anesthetic are necessary to bathe all nervous trunks. This may lead to higher success rates and better quality anesthesia and analgesia.
REFERENCES
De Jong RH. Axillary block of the brachial plexus . Anesthesiology 1961;22:215-225.
Vester-Anderson T, Husum B, Lindeburg T, Borrits L, Gothgen I. Perivascular axillary block Iv: Blockade following 40, 50 or 60 ml of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1984;28:99-105.
Winnie AP, Radonjic R, Akkinemi SR, Durrani Z. Factors influencing the distribution of local anesthetics in the braquial plexus sheat. Anesth Anal 1979;58:225-234.
Vester-Anderson T, Christiansen C, Sorensen M, et al. Perivascular axillary block: II. Influence of injected volume of local anesthetic on neural blockade. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1983;27:95-98.
Williams HB, Jabaley ME. The importance of internal anatomy of the peripheral nerves to nerve repair in the forearm and hand. Hand Clin 1986;2:689-707.
Hogan Q. Finding nerves is not simple. Editorials. Reg Anesth and Pain Med 2003;28:367-371.
Tobias JD. Brachial plexus anaesthesia in children. Paediatric Anaesthesia 20001;11:265-275.
Bernards CM, Kopacz DJ. Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: A microdialysis study in humans . Anesthesiology 1999;91:962-968.
Hollmén A. Axillary plexus block. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1966;Suppl.21:53-65.
Urmey WF. Upper extremity blocks. In: Brown DL, ed. Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1era ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996:254-278.
Neal J, Helb J, Gerancher JC, Hogan Q. Brachial plexus anesthesia: Essentials of our current understanding. Reg Anesth and Pain Med 2002;27.
Marhofer P, Nasel C, Sitzwohl C, Karpal S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distribution of local anesthetic during the three-in one block. Anest Analg 2000;90:119-124.
Nishiyama M, Naganuma K, Amaki Y. A new approach for brachial plexus block under fluroscopic guiadance. Anesth Analg 1999;88:91-97.
Patridge BL, Benirschke K. Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheath: implications for anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987;66:743-747.
Casati A, Fanelli G, Aldegheri G, Berti M, Colnaghi E, Cedrati V, Torri G. Interescalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: a double-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:872-875.
Covino BG, Wildsmith JAW. Clinical pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. In: Cousins Mj, Bridenbaugh PO, ed. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. 3era ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998: 97-128.
Dogru K, Duygulu F, Yildiz K, Kotanoglu MS, Madenoglu H, Boyaci A. Hemodynamic and blockade effects of high/low epinephrine doses during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%: a randomized, double-blinded study. Reg Anesth and Pain Med 2003;28:401-405.