medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2022; 61 (3)

Secondary rhinoplasty in patients with clef lip and palate

Gálvez CJC, Ortega LM, Dávila SBH, Noguera MF

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 1-19
PDF size: 506.16 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Nasal deformity associated with cleft lip has been seen as one of the most challenging reconstructive problems in rhinoplasty; up to date, no single method has been agreed upon to quantify management success. In 2006, the protocol for managing complex nasal deformities was officially approved by Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical Surgical Hospital, which includes secondary congenital nasal deformities in adults; however, there is no history of outcomes in this group of patients based on objective measurements.
Objective: To assess the aesthetic outcomes of secondary rhinoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Methods: An analytical study was carried out through linear and angular nasal measurements, compared in standardized photographs between the pre- and postoperative period; while the asymmetry index was determined according to Nakamura's formula. A panel of experts used the Asher McDade scale and performed the subjective assessment of the images, which allowed calculation of the esthetic index before and after the procedure.
Results: A marked reduction was obtained in all nasal asymmetry indexes between the pre- and postoperative periods; as well as an improvement in the postoperative aesthetic index, from a poor appearance to a very good appearance.
Conclusions: With the application of the protocol for managing nasal deformities of the adult cleft patient of Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical Surgical Hospital, good esthetic outcomes are obtained.


REFERENCES

  1. Khaled A, Elbastarb M, Eltawb A. Addressing the soft tissue element in unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. Egyptian Journal of Medical Research. 2021 [acceso 30/06/2021];2(1):1-3. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://ejmr.journals.ekb.eg/article_145840.html 1.

  2. Sundine MJ, Phillips JH. Treatment of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15:69-76.

  3. Meyer M. Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;70:224-36.

  4. . Hsieh T-y, Dedhia R, Del Toro D, Tollefson TT. Cleft septorhinoplasty form and function. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2017 [acceso 30/06/2021];25:223-38Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28340653/ 4.

  5. Montague P, Armeni M. Unilateral cleft lip rhinoplasty. Operative techniques in otolaryngology. 2018 [acceso 03/07/2021];29:70-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1450197/ 5.

  6. Sharma V, Bella H, Cadier M, Pigott R, Goodacre T, Richard B, et al. Outcomes in facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery: A systematic review. J Plast Recon Aesth Surg. 2012;65:1233-45.

  7. Nakamura T, Okamoto K, Maruyama T. Facial asymmetry in patients with cervicobrachial pain and headache. J Oral Rehab. 2001;28:1009-14.

  8. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw W. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearence in patients with cleft of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;4(28):385-90.

  9. Harrison CJ, Rae C, Tsangaris E, Wong Riffd K, Swan MC, Goodacre T, et al. Further construct validation of the CLEFT-Q: Ability to detect differences in outcome for four cleft-specific surgeries. J Plast Recon Aesth Surg. 2019 [acceso 30/06/2021];72:2049-55. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31488380/ 9.

  10. . Declaración de Helsinki de la Asociación Médica Mundial. Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Octubre 2008. 59Ş Asamblea General, Seúl, Corea. Disponible en: http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/servicios/medicamentos/declaracion_de_helsinki_octubre_2008.pdf10.

  11. . Office for National Statistics. Congenital Anomaly Statistics, England and Wales. Series MB3. 2000 [acceso 02/08/2012];15. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/congenital-anomalystatistics Inglaterra y Gales m series-mb3-/no 15.2000/index.html 11.

  12. CRANE. Informe anual 2011. Base de datos de CRANE. 2011 [acceso 02/08/2012]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.cranedatabase.org.uk/publications/crane_annual_report_2011.pdf 12.

  13. Lovegrove E, Rumsey N. Ignoring it doesn't make it stop: adolescent's appearance and bullying. Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):33-44.

  14. Hellings P, Nolst Trenité GJ. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(6):985-9.

  15. Hsieh T-y, Dedhia R, Del Toro D, Tollefson TT. Cleft septorhinoplasty form and function. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am . 2017 [acceso 30/06/2021];25:223-38. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28340653/ 15.

  16. . Montague P, Armeni M. Unilateral cleft lip rhinoplasty. Operative techniques in otolaryngology . 2018 [acceso 03/07/2021];29:70-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1450197/ 16.

  17. Springer IN. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of asymmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(2):156-62.

  18. Meyer-Marcotty P. Face perception in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients with severe class III malocclusion compared to controls. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(3):158-63).

  19. Farkas L, Katic M, Forrest C. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16:615-46.

  20. Mulliken J. Bilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity: An anthropometric analysis of staged to synchronous repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:9-23.

  21. Nakamura N, Sasaguri M, Nozoe E, Nishihara K, Hasegawa H. Postoperative nasal forms after presurgical nasoalveolar molding followed by medial-upward advancement of nasolabial components with vestibular expansion for children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2222-31.

  22. Reddy SG, Devarakonda V, Reddy RR. Assessment of nostril symmetry after primary cleft rhinoplasty in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:147-52.

  23. Zhang Z, Huang T, He Y, Li S, Li Z, Chen J, et al. Modified use of costal cartilage in Asians for the correction of nostril asymmetry in unilateral secondary cleft lip nasal deformity. Ann Plast Surg. 2021 [acceso 20/09/2021];86(2):175-81. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32756249/ 23.

  24. . Seo H, Denadai R, Lo L. Long-term nasal growth after primary rhinoplasty for bilateral cleft lip nose deformity: A three-dimensional photogrammetric study with comparative analysis. 2019 [acceso 08/12/2020]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31052470/ 24.

  25. Chaithanyaa N, Rai K, Shivakumar H, Upasi A. Evaluation of the outcome of secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients. J Plast Recon Aesth Surg. 2011;64:27-33.

  26. Gassling V, Koos B, Birkenfeld F, Witfang J, Zimmermann C. Secondary cleft nose rhinoplasty: Subjective and objective outcome evaluation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:1855-62.

  27. Chow T-K, Yu N-F, Tang N-C, Yan S-W. Challenges in maxillofacial reconstruction on secondary cleft deformities. Ann Coll Surg HK. 2003;7:64-72.

  28. Ibáńez-Berganza M, Amico A, Loreto V. Subjectivity and complexity of facial attractiveness. Scientific Reports. 2019 [acceso 30/06/2021];9:1-12. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-44655-9 28.

  29. Keijser K, Nowinski D. Photographic measurements partially correlate to nasal function and appearance among adult cleft patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(5):720.

  30. Mbuyi-Musanzayi S, Tshilombo Katombe F, Lukasa Tshilobo P, Kalenga Mwenze P. Anthropometric and aesthetic outcomes for the nasolabial region in 101 consecutive African children with unilateral cleft lip one year after repair using the anatomical subunit approximation technique. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017;46:1338-45.

  31. Mosmuller D, Maal TJ, Prahl C, Tan R, Mulder F, Schwirtz R, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional assessment methods of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients Do the assessment methods measure the same outcome? Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2017;45:1220-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com