medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2024; 20 (4)

How to make a step-by-step scientific poster in traumatology and orthopedic

Pérez MAF, Lepe LJI, Jesús MOMT, Pérez CMA

Language: Spanish
References: 41
Page: 273-286
PDF size: 575.85 Kb.


ABSTRACT

A scientific poster is a graphic summary of research results, which has the advantage of providing a brief, interesting and visually attractive experience that encourages public interest in science, as well as in research and project publication. It is important to note that, within the field of orthopedics, there are specific details and considerations that must be taken into account when developing a scientific poster. This includes aspects related to anatomy, biomechanics, surgical approaches, use of implants, epidemiology, as well as the presentation of radiographic data and functional results of clinical studies. Presenting an effective poster in orthopedics requires skills in research, computing, design, writing, and presentation. Therefore, a comprehensive guide is provided that helps from the beginning to the end of the process to facilitate the development of successful work.


REFERENCES

  1. van't Hooft A. Cómo elaborar un cartel científico. Revista COLSAN. 2014; 5: 134-145.

  2. Jiménez ÁJM, Muleiro EP, Salcido RMV. Cómo realizar un cartel científico en cirugía de columna. Cir Columna. 2023; 1 (1): 59-64.

  3. Moore LW, Augspurger P, King MO, Proffitt C. Insights on the poster preparation and presentation process. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2001; 14 (2): 100-104.

  4. Prieto L. Más allá de los métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos: el método científico. Rev Salud Pública. 1997; 5: 195-199.

  5. Gundogan B, Koshy K, Kurar L, Whitehurst K. How to make an academic poster. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016; 11: 69-71.

  6. Friedman GD. Be kind to your reader. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132 (4): 591-593.

  7. Guirao-Goris SJA. Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura. Ene. 2015; 9 (2). doi: 10.4321/S1988-348X2015000200002.

  8. Pasteur L. Etudes sur la biere, ses maladies causes qui les provoquent, procédé pour la rendre inaltérable, avec une théorie nouvelle de la fermentation. Paris: Gauthier-Villars; 1876.

  9. Levitt HM. How to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity. Psychother Res. 2018; 28 (3): 367-378.

  10. Siwek J, Gourlay ML, Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. How to write an evidence-based clinical review article. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 65 (2): 251-258.

  11. Pautasso M. Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9 (7): e1003149.

  12. Shelledy DC. How to make an effective poster. Respir Care. 2004; 49 (10): 1213-1216.

  13. Christenbery TL, Latham TG. Creating effective scholarly posters: a guide for DNP students. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013; 25 (1): 16-23.

  14. Kralikova B, Leutwyler A, Pernin T. Comment réaliser un poster scientifique? Rev Med Suisse. 2019; 15 (664): 1707-1710.

  15. Taggart HM, Arslanian C. Creating an effective poster presentation. Orthop Nurs. 2000; 19 (3): 47-49.

  16. Van Wee B, Banister D. How to write a literature review paper? Transp Rev. 2016; 36 (2): 278-288. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456.

  17. Masic I. The importance of proper citation of references in biomedical articles. Acta Inform Med. 2013; 21 (3): 148-155.

  18. Penders B. Ten simple rules for responsible referencing. PLoS computational biology. 2018; 14 (4): e1006036.

  19. de Lacey G, Record C, Wade J. How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 291 (6499): 884-886.

  20. Mackey SC. Clarification of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA. 2022; 327 (16): 1617.

  21. Annane D, Charpentier B. Do I have a conflict of interest? Yes. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44 (10): 1741-1743.

  22. Punjabi PP. A surge in "interest of conflict" in "conflict of interest". Perfusion. 2020; 35 (2): 95.

  23. Celis MÁ, Halabe J, Arrieta O, Burgos R, Campillo C, De la Llata M, et al. Conflictos de intereses en medicina. Recomendaciones del CETREMI. Gac Med Mex. 2019; 155 (5): 563-564.

  24. Muth CC. Conflict of interest in Medicine. JAMA. 2017; 317: 1812.

  25. Grech V. Presenting scientific work-news media theory in presentations, abstracts, and posters. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13 (Suppl 1): S59-S62.

  26. Young J, Bridgeman MB, Hermes-DeSantis ER. Presentation of scientific poster information: lessons learned from evaluating the impact of content arrangement and use of infographics. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019; 11 (2): 204-210.

  27. Ambrose G., Harris P. The fundamentals of graphic design. London, UK: AVA Publishing SA Bloomsbury Publishing Plc; 2009.

  28. Palmer SE. Modern theories of Gestalt perception. Mind Lang. 1990; 5: 289-323.

  29. Forsyth R, Waller A. Making your point: principles of visual design for computer aided slide and poster production. Arch Dis Child. 1995; 72 (1): 80-84.

  30. Adams FM, Osgood CE. A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1973; 4: 135-156.

  31. Wexner LB. The degree to which colors (hues) are associated with mood-tones. J Appl Psychol. 1954; 38: 432-435.

  32. Won S, Westland S. Colour meaning and context. Color Res Appl. 2017; 42: 450-459.

  33. Xu H, Shi L. Analysis of graphic language expression in visual communication design. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022: 2434992.

  34. Lopes D, Correia J, Machado P. EvoDesigner: evolving poster layouts. Entropy (Basel). 2022; 24 (12): 1751.

  35. Crick K, Hartling L. Preferences of knowledge users for two formats of summarizing results from systematic reviews: infographics and critical appraisals. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (10): e0140029.

  36. Wen L, Jingjing W, Chen W, Luyu S. Research on the visual imagery of posters based on the culture code theory of design. Front Psychol. 2022; 13: 861366.

  37. Harikrishnan KM, Kumaravelu S. Poster presentation: an effective means of scientific communication. J. Assoc. Physicians India. 1995; 43 (8): 546-547.

  38. Block SM. Do's and don'ts of poster presentation. Biophys J. 1996; 71 (6): 3527-3529.

  39. Rieder CE. Guidelines for a scientific presentation. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 702-707.

  40. Mendoza-Martínez VM, Rivera-Heredia ME, González-Videgaray M, Del Río-Martínez JH. Criterios para la presentación de carteles científicos. Revista de la Comisión de Investigación de FIMPES. 2007; 2: 11-21.

  41. Blome C, Sondermann H, Augustin M. Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers. GMS J Med Educ. 2017; 34 (1): Doc11.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com