2021, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev cubana med 2021; 60 (4)
Benefits of effect size and Bayes factor conversion in health science investigations
Ramos-Vera CA
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 1-4
PDF size: 201.93 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Brydges CR. Effect size guidelines, sample size calculations, and statisticalpower in gerontology. Innov Aging. 2019;3(4):igz036. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036
Lovell DP. Null hypothesis significance testing and effect sizes: can we effecteverything or anything? Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2020;51:68-77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2019.12.001
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Metaanalysis.West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009.
Field AP, Gillett R. How to do a meta-analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol.2010;63:665-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Calculation of effect sizes. Dettelbach: 2016[acceso:13/01/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html
Campbell M. Effect sizes for relationships between variables. African Journal ofMidwifery and Women s Health. 2018;12(4):162-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12968/ajmw.2018.12.4.162
Ramos Vera CA. La alternativa metodológica del factor Bayes en lainvestigación clínica de nutrición. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet. 2020;24(4):401-3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.24.4.1231d
Ramos Vera CA. Replicación bayesiana: cuán probable es la hipótesis nula ehipótesis alterna. Edu Méd. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.09.014
Goss Sampson MA. Bayesian Inference in JASP: A guide for students. Universityof Amsterdam: JASP team; 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CKNXM
Schönbrodt FD, Wagenmakers EJ. Bayes factor design analysis: planning forcompelling evidence. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018;25:128-42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y
Fonte Sevillano T. Deterioro cognitivo leve en personas mayores de 85 años.Rev Cubana Med. 2020[acceso: 13/01/2020];59(1):e1314. Disponible en:http://www.revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/1314
Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC. Understandingthe minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.Spine J. 2007;7(5):541-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008