Ozdogan A, Tosun B

Language: English
References: 31
Page: 66-74
PDF size: 805.02 Kb.

ABSTRACT

There is insufficient information about the chairside polishing methods of polyether ether ketone material. Therefore, it is aimed in this study to investigate the effects of different polishing processes on polyether ether ketone surface roughness and hardness. A total of 66 disc-shaped specimens made of polyether ether ketone were used in this study. The specimens were polished conventionally and randomly divided into three groups (n=22). One group was designated as the control group, and no further treatment was applied. In the other two groups, the specimens’ surfaces were abraded with diamond burs and polished using two different polishing kits. Their surface roughness and Vickers hardness were measured, and environmental scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy examinations were performed. The data were statistically analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s honest significant difference test (α=0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the control and polishing kit groups in terms of either surface roughness or Vickers hardness (p>0.05). The polishing kits can be used reliably and effectively for polishing polyether ether ketone materials.

REFERENCES

1. Merrett K., Cornelius R.M., McClung W.G., Unsworth L.D., Sheardown H. Surface analysis methods for characterizing polymeric biomaterials. J Biomat Sci-Polym E. 2002; 13 (6): 593-621.

2. Skirbutis G., Dzingute A., Masiliunaite V., Sulcaite G., Zilinskas J. A review of PEEK polymer's properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija. 2017; 19 (1): 19-23.

3. Lied B., Roenning P.A., Sundseth J., Helseth E. Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage). BMC Surg. 2010; 10: 10.

4. Alonso-Rodriguez E., Cebrian J.L., Nieto M.J., Del Castillo J.L., Hernandez-Godoy J., Burgueno M. Polyetheretherketone custom-made implants for craniofacial defects: Report of 14 cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43 (7): 1232-1238.

5. Najeeb S., Zafar M.S., Khurshid Z., Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60 (1): 12-19.

6. Schwitalla A., Muller W.D. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39 (6): 743-749.

7. Mijiritsky E. Plastic temporary abutments with provisional restorations in immediate loading procedures: a clinical report. Implant Dent. 2006; 15 (3): 236-240.

8. Tetelman E.D., Babbush C.A. A new transitional abutment for immediate esthetics and function. Implant Dent. 2008; 17 (1): 51-58.

9. Maekawa M., Kanno Z., Wada T., Hongo T., Doi H., Hanawa T., Ono T., Uo M. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires made of super engineering plastic. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34 (1): 114-119.

10. Tannous F., Steiner M., Shahin R., Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater. 2012; 28 (3): 273-278.

11. Liebermann A., Wimmer T., Schmidlin P.R., Scherer H., Loffler P., Roos M., Stawarczyk B. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (3): 321-328 e322.

12. Kurtz S.M., Devine J.N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomater. 2007; 28 (32): 4845-4869.

13. Chu F.C., Frankel N., Smales R.J. Surface roughness and flexural strength of self-glazed, polished, and reglazed In-Ceram/Vitadur Alpha porcelain laminates. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13 (1): 66-71.

14. Tholt de Vasconcellos B., Miranda-Junior W.G., Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent. 2006; 31 (4): 442-449.

15. Braem M., Finger W., Van Doren V.E., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5 (5): 346-348.

16. Martinez-Gomis J., Bizar J., Anglada J.M, Samso J., Peraire M. Comparative evaluation of four finishing systems on one ceramic surface. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16 (1): 74-77.

17. Jefferies S.R. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am. 1998; 42 (4): 613-627.

18. Steiner R., Beier U.S., Heiss-Kisielewsky I., Engelmeier R., Dumfahrt H., Dhima M. Adjusting dental ceramics: An in vitro evaluation of the ability of various ceramic polishing kits to mimic glazed dental ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113 (6): 616-622.

19. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., Walls A.W. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites. Dent Mater. 1992; 8 (4): 218-223.

20. Dragnevski K.I., Donald A.M. Applications of environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) in the study of novel drying latex films. J Phys Conf Ser. 2008; 126: 1-4.

21. Silthampitag P., Chaijareenont P., Tattakorn K., Banjongprasert C., Takahashi H., Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35 (4): 668-674.

22. Ourahmoune R., Salvia M., Mathia T.G., Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning. 2014; 36 (1): 64-75.

23. Han X., Yang D., Yang C., Spintzyk S., Scheideler L., Li P., Li D., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Rupp F. Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (2): 1-17.

24. Culhaoglu A.K., Ozkir S.E., Sahin V., Yilmaz B., Kilicarslan M.A. Effect of Various Treatment Modalities on Surface Characteristics and Shear Bond Strengths of Polyetheretherketone-Based Core Materials. J Prosthodont. 2020; 29 (2): 136-141.

25. Khruschov M.M. Principles of Abrasive Wear. Wear 1974; 28 (1): 69-88.

26. Jeong D.H., Erb U., Aust K.T., Palumbo G. The relationship between hardness and abrasive wear resistance of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni-P coatings. Scripta Mater. 2003; 48 (8): 1067-1072.

27. Nisa V.S., Rajesh S., Murali K.P., Priyadarsini V., Potty S.N., Ratheesh R. Preparation, characterization and dielectric properties of temperature stable SrTiO3/PEEK composites for microwave substrate applications. Compos Sci Technol. 2008; 68 (1): 106-112.

28. Kumar A., Yap W.T., Foo S.L., Lee T.K. Effects of Sterilization Cycles on PEEK for Medical Device Application. Bioengineering. 2018; 5 (1).

29. Heimer S., Schmidlin P.R., Roos M., Stawarczyk B. Surface properties of polyetheretherketone after different laboratory and chairside polishing protocols. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117 (3): 419-425.

30. Sturz C.R., Faber F.J., Scheer M., Rothamel D., Neugebauer J. Effects of various chairside surface treatment methods on dental restorative materials with respect to contact angles and surface roughness. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34 (6): 796-813.

31. Liu Y., Shen J.Z. Clinical failures of ceramic dental prostheses. In: Shen JZ (ed). Advanced Ceramics For Dentistry. Waltham: Elsevier; 2014.