Ozdogan A, Tosun B

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 31
Paginas: 66-74
Archivo PDF: 805.02 Kb.

RESUMEN

No existe información suficiente sobre los métodos de pulido del material poliéter éter cetona. Por tanto, este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar el efecto de diferentes procedimientos de pulido sobre la rugosidad y dureza de superficie de un material a base de poliéter éter acetona. Un total de 66 muestras en forma de disco fueron realizadas. Los especímenes fueron divididos en tres grupos (n=22). Un grupo fue designado como grupo de control, siendo que no se aplicó ningún tratamiento. En los otros dos grupos, las superficies de las muestras se lijaron con fresas de diamante y se pulieron con dos kits de pulido diferentes. Se investigó la rugosidad de superficie y la dureza Vickers en los diferentes grupos. También fueron evaluadas muestras representativas en microscopía electrónica de barrido y microscopía de fuerza atómica. Los datos se analizaron estadísticamente mediante el análisis de varianza (ANOVA) y el método de Tukey (α=0.05). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos en términos de rugosidad de superficie o Dureza Vickers (p>0,05). Los kits de pulido se pueden utilizar de forma eficaz para el pulido de materiales a base de poliéter éter acetona.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Merrett K., Cornelius R.M., McClung W.G., Unsworth L.D., Sheardown H. Surface analysis methods for characterizing polymeric biomaterials. J Biomat Sci-Polym E. 2002; 13 (6): 593-621.

2. Skirbutis G., Dzingute A., Masiliunaite V., Sulcaite G., Zilinskas J. A review of PEEK polymer's properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija. 2017; 19 (1): 19-23.

3. Lied B., Roenning P.A., Sundseth J., Helseth E. Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage). BMC Surg. 2010; 10: 10.

4. Alonso-Rodriguez E., Cebrian J.L., Nieto M.J., Del Castillo J.L., Hernandez-Godoy J., Burgueno M. Polyetheretherketone custom-made implants for craniofacial defects: Report of 14 cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43 (7): 1232-1238.

5. Najeeb S., Zafar M.S., Khurshid Z., Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60 (1): 12-19.

6. Schwitalla A., Muller W.D. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39 (6): 743-749.

7. Mijiritsky E. Plastic temporary abutments with provisional restorations in immediate loading procedures: a clinical report. Implant Dent. 2006; 15 (3): 236-240.

8. Tetelman E.D., Babbush C.A. A new transitional abutment for immediate esthetics and function. Implant Dent. 2008; 17 (1): 51-58.

9. Maekawa M., Kanno Z., Wada T., Hongo T., Doi H., Hanawa T., Ono T., Uo M. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires made of super engineering plastic. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34 (1): 114-119.

10. Tannous F., Steiner M., Shahin R., Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater. 2012; 28 (3): 273-278.

11. Liebermann A., Wimmer T., Schmidlin P.R., Scherer H., Loffler P., Roos M., Stawarczyk B. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (3): 321-328 e322.

12. Kurtz S.M., Devine J.N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomater. 2007; 28 (32): 4845-4869.

13. Chu F.C., Frankel N., Smales R.J. Surface roughness and flexural strength of self-glazed, polished, and reglazed In-Ceram/Vitadur Alpha porcelain laminates. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13 (1): 66-71.

14. Tholt de Vasconcellos B., Miranda-Junior W.G., Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent. 2006; 31 (4): 442-449.

15. Braem M., Finger W., Van Doren V.E., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5 (5): 346-348.

16. Martinez-Gomis J., Bizar J., Anglada J.M, Samso J., Peraire M. Comparative evaluation of four finishing systems on one ceramic surface. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16 (1): 74-77.

17. Jefferies S.R. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am. 1998; 42 (4): 613-627.

18. Steiner R., Beier U.S., Heiss-Kisielewsky I., Engelmeier R., Dumfahrt H., Dhima M. Adjusting dental ceramics: An in vitro evaluation of the ability of various ceramic polishing kits to mimic glazed dental ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113 (6): 616-622.

19. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., Walls A.W. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites. Dent Mater. 1992; 8 (4): 218-223.

20. Dragnevski K.I., Donald A.M. Applications of environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) in the study of novel drying latex films. J Phys Conf Ser. 2008; 126: 1-4.

21. Silthampitag P., Chaijareenont P., Tattakorn K., Banjongprasert C., Takahashi H., Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35 (4): 668-674.

22. Ourahmoune R., Salvia M., Mathia T.G., Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning. 2014; 36 (1): 64-75.

23. Han X., Yang D., Yang C., Spintzyk S., Scheideler L., Li P., Li D., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Rupp F. Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (2): 1-17.

24. Culhaoglu A.K., Ozkir S.E., Sahin V., Yilmaz B., Kilicarslan M.A. Effect of Various Treatment Modalities on Surface Characteristics and Shear Bond Strengths of Polyetheretherketone-Based Core Materials. J Prosthodont. 2020; 29 (2): 136-141.

25. Khruschov M.M. Principles of Abrasive Wear. Wear 1974; 28 (1): 69-88.

26. Jeong D.H., Erb U., Aust K.T., Palumbo G. The relationship between hardness and abrasive wear resistance of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni-P coatings. Scripta Mater. 2003; 48 (8): 1067-1072.

27. Nisa V.S., Rajesh S., Murali K.P., Priyadarsini V., Potty S.N., Ratheesh R. Preparation, characterization and dielectric properties of temperature stable SrTiO3/PEEK composites for microwave substrate applications. Compos Sci Technol. 2008; 68 (1): 106-112.

28. Kumar A., Yap W.T., Foo S.L., Lee T.K. Effects of Sterilization Cycles on PEEK for Medical Device Application. Bioengineering. 2018; 5 (1).

29. Heimer S., Schmidlin P.R., Roos M., Stawarczyk B. Surface properties of polyetheretherketone after different laboratory and chairside polishing protocols. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117 (3): 419-425.

30. Sturz C.R., Faber F.J., Scheer M., Rothamel D., Neugebauer J. Effects of various chairside surface treatment methods on dental restorative materials with respect to contact angles and surface roughness. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34 (6): 796-813.

31. Liu Y., Shen J.Z. Clinical failures of ceramic dental prostheses. In: Shen JZ (ed). Advanced Ceramics For Dentistry. Waltham: Elsevier; 2014.