medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2021; 23 (2)

Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Bulk-Fill and Fiber- Reinforced Composites in Class II Cavities

Keskin G, Uçar GZ, Burak TG

Language: English
References: 45
Page: 115-125
PDF size: 802.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of teeth restored with conventional, bulk-fill, and fiber-reinforced composite materials regarding intact teeth. Standard cavities were prepared on 70 sound third molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups: intact teeth, conventional Bis-GMA based composite, fiber-reinforced composite, Bis-GMA based bulk-fill composite, ormocer based bulk-fill composite, glass containing resin-based bulk-fill composite. The data was obtained by a Universal Testing Machine and analyzed statistically. Fracture resistance of the teeth restored with conventional composite was significantly lower than the other groups (p‹0.05). The teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite showed the highest fracture resistance; however, there were no statistically significant differences between intact teeth and teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite, Bis-GMA based bulkfill composite, and glass containing resin-based bulk-fill composite (p›0.05). The obtained data showed that restoring teeth with bulk-fill and fiber-reinforced composites could be recommended in Class II cavities.


REFERENCES

  1. Akbarian G., Ameri H., Chasteen J.E., Ghavamnasiri M. Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Silorane-Based or Dimethacrylate-Based Composite Resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014; 26 (3): 200-7.

  2. van Dijken J.W., Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent. 2016; 51: 29-35.

  3. Han S.H., Sadr A., Tagami J., Park S.H. Internal adaptation of resin composites at two configurations: Influence of polymerization shrinkage and stress. Dent Mater. 2016; 32 (9): 1085-94.

  4. Singhal S., Gurtu A., Singhal A., Bansal R., Mohan S. Effect of Different Composite Restorations on the Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Different Insertion Techniques- An In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11 (8): ZC67-ZC70.

  5. Oliveira L.R.S., Braga S.S.L., Bicalho A.A., Ribeiro M.T.H., Price R.B., Soares C.J. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques. J Dent. 2018; 74: 71-78.

  6. Hegde V., Sali A.V. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites in comparison to the incremental placement technique. J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20 (5): 360-364.

  7. Rosa de Lacerda L., Bossardi M., Silveira Mitterhofer W.J., Galbiatti de Carvalho F., Carlo H.L., Piva E., Münchow E.A. New generation bulk-fill resin composites: Effects on mechanical strength and fracture reliability. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 96: 214-218.

  8. Soares C.J., Faria-E-Silva A.L., Rodrigues M.P., Vilela A.B.F., Pfeifer C.S., Tantbirojn D., Versluis A. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements - What do we need to know? Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31 (suppl 1): e62.

  9. Taubock T.T., Jager F., Attin T. Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force kinetics of high- and low-viscosity dimethacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk-fill resin composites. Odontology. 2019; 107 (1): 103-10.

  10. Rosatto C.M., Bicalho A.A., Veríssimo C., Bragança G.F., Rodrigues M.P. Tantbirojn D., Versluis A., Soares C.J. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015; 43 (12): 1519-28.

  11. Algamaiah H., Danso R., Banas J., Armstrong S.R., Whang K., Rawls H.R., Teixeira E.C. The Effect of Aging Methods on the Fracture Toughness and Physical Stability of an Oxirane/Acrylate, Ormocer, and Bis-Gma-Based Resin Composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24 (1): 369-375.

  12. Soares L.M., Razaghy M., Magne P. Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations. Dent Mater. 2018; 34 (4): 587-597.

  13. Atalay C., Yazici A.R., Horuztepe A., Nagas E., Ertan A., Ozgunaltay G. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite. Oper Dent. 2016; 41 (5): E131-E140.

  14. E l-Damanhoury H., Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Operative dentistry. 2014; 39 (4): 374-82.

  15. Marovic D., Taubock T.T., Attin T, Panduric V., Tarle Z. Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2015; 73 (6): 474-80.

  16. Taubock T.T., Tarle Z., Marovic D., Attin T. Pre-heating of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: effects on shrinkage force and monomer conversion. Journal of dentistry. 2015; 43 (11): 1358-64.

  17. Benetti A.R., Havndrup-Pedersen C., Honore D., Pedersen M.K., Pallesen U. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Operative dentistry. 2015; 40 (2): 190-200.

  18. Sedrez-Porto J.A., Munchow E.A., Valente L.L., Cenci M.S., Pereira-Cenci T. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Brazilian oral research. 2019; 33: e012.

  19. Wafaie R.A., Ibrahim Ali A., Mahmoud S.H. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30 (3): 229-239.

  20. Gallo M., Abouelleil H., Chenal J.M., Adrien J., Lachambre J., Colon P., Maire E. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based composites for dental restorations: A digital volume correlation study. Dent Mater. 2019; 35 (11): 1654-1664.

  21. Kaisarly D., Gezawi M.E. Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review. Odontology. 2016; 104 (3): 257-70.

  22. Gan J.K., Yap A.U., Cheong J.W., Arista N., Tan C. Bulk-Fill Composites: Effectiveness of Cure With Poly- and Monowave Curing Lights and Modes. Oper Dent. 2018; 43 (2): 136-143.

  23. Hada Y.S., Panwar S. Comparison of the fracture resistance of three different recent composite systems in large Class II mesio-occlusal distal cavities: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22 (3): 287-291.

  24. Meenakumari C., Bhat K.M., Bansal R., Singh N. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Newer Nanoposterior Restorative Resin Composites: An In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018; 9 (Suppl 1): S142-S146.

  25. Abouelleil H., Pradelle N., Villat C., Attik N., Colon P., Grosgogeat B. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a New Fiber Reinforced Composite and Bulk Filling Composites. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40 (4): 262-70.

  26. Bijelic-Donova J., Uctasli S., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L. Original and Repair Bulk Fracture Resistance of Particle Filler and Short Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Oper Dent. 2018; 43 (5): E232-E242.

  27. Garoushi S., Säilynoja E., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013; 29 (8): 835-41.

  28. Garoushi S.K., Hatem M., Lassila L.V.J., Vallittu P.K. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2015; 1 (1): 6-12.

  29. Rocca G.T., Saratti C.M., Cattani-Lorente M., Feilzer A.J., Scherrer S., Krejci I. The effect of a fiber reinforced cavity configuration on load bearing capacity and failure mode of endodontically treated molars restored with CAD/CAM resin composite overlay restorations. J Dent. 2015; 43 (9): 1106-1115.

  30. Bijelic-Donova J., Keulemans F., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L.V.J. Direct bilayered biomimetic composite restoration: The effect of a cusp-supporting short fiber-reinforced base design on the chewing fracture resistance and failure mode of molars with or without endodontic treatment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103554.

  31. Garoushi S., Gargoum A., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: A review of the current literature. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018; 9 (3): e12330.

  32. Vallittu P.K. High-aspect ratio fillers: fiber-reinforced composites and their anisotropic properties. Dent Mater. 2015; 31 (1): 1-7.

  33. García Marí L., Climent Gil A., LLena Puy C. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mater J. 2019; 38 (5): 721-727.

  34. Lins R, Vinagre A, Alberto N, Domingues MF, Messias A, Martins LR, Nogueira R, Ramos JC. Polymerization Shrinkage Evaluation of Restorative Resin-Based Composites Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11 (5).

  35. Loguercio A.D., Rezende M., Gutierrez M.F., Costa T.F., Armas-Vega A., Reis A. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2019; 85: 93-102.

  36. Heck K., Manhart J., Hickel R., Diegritz C. Clinical evaluation of the bulk fill composite QuiXfil in molar class I and II cavities: 10-year results of a RCT. Dent Mater. 2018; 34 (6): e138-e147.

  37. Mergulhão V.A., de Mendonça L.S., de Albuquerque M.S., Braz R. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods. Oper Dent. 2019; 44 (1): E1-E11.

  38. Lins R.B.E., Aristilde S., Osório J.H., Cordeiro C.M.B., Yanikian C.R.F., Bicalho A.A., Stape T.H.S., Soares C.J., Martins L.R.M. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 98: 255-261.

  39. Van Ende A., De Munck J., Lise D.P., Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-Fill Composites: A Review of the Current Literature. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19 (2): 95-109.

  40. Monsarrat P., Garnier S., Vergnes J.N., Nasr K., Grosgogeat B., Joniot S. Survival of directly placed ormocer-based restorative materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2017; 33 (5): e212-e220.

  41. Beun S., Glorieux T., Devaux J., Vreven J., Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (1): 51-9.

  42. Shimokawa C., Giannini M., André C.B., Sahadi B.O., Faraoni J.J., Palma-Dibb R.G., Soares C.J., Price R.B. In Vitro Evaluation of Surface Properties and Wear Resistance of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites After Brushing With a Dentifrice. Oper Dent. 2019; 44 (6): 637-647.

  43. Fronza B.M., Ayres A., Pacheco R.R., Rueggeberg F.A., Dias C., Giannini M. Characterization of Inorganic Filler Content, Mechanical Properties, and Light Transmission of Bulk-fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent. 2017; 42 (4): 445-455.

  44. Shibasaki S., Takamizawa T., Nojiri K., Imai A., Tsujimoto A., Endo H., Suzuki S., Suda S., Barkmeier W.W., Latta M.A., Miyazaki M. Polymerization Behavior and Mechanical Properties of High-Viscosity Bulk Fill and Low Shrinkage Resin Composites. Oper Dent. 2017; 42 (6): E177-E187.

  45. Göktürk H., Karaarslan E.Ş., Tekin E., Hologlu B., Sarıkaya I. The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18 (1): 196.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com