medigraphic.com
Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2021; 66 (3)

Effectivity of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with lacrimal sac marsupialization in patients with chronic dacryocystitis

Cantú-Cavazos NJ, Celis-Aguilar EM, Torrontegui-Zazueta L, Medina-Cabrera C

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 207-213
PDF size: 208.28 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine if endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with marsupialization of lacrimal sac is as effective as or more effective than the external dacryocystorhinostomy.
Materials and Methods: An ambispective study including patients submitted to surgery from January 2016 to March 2020 at Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery of Civil Hospital of Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico. There were included patients who had undergone endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with marsupialization of the lacrimal sac, followed by outpatient consultation to assess the symptoms after surgery and by nasal endoscopy to assess the permeability of the ostium.
Results: There were included 20 patients; female sex was the most prevalent (15/20). Out of the 20 patients submitted to endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, 13 had symptoms relieve; 18/20 had permeable ostium and 8/20 presented residual symptoms despite having a permeable ostium.
Conclusions: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with marsupialization of the lacrimal sac offers great promises; favorable results were obtained in the relieve of symptoms in patients with chronic dacryocystitis.


REFERENCES

  1. Trimarchi M, Giordano-Resti A, Vinciguerra A, Danè G, et al. Dacryocystorhinostomy: evolution of endoscopic techniques after 498 cases. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020; 30 (5): 998-1003. doi: 10.1177/1120672119854582.

  2. Chen X, Liu Y. Efficacy of nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for chronic dacryocystitis: a systematic review protocol of randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (12): 1-4. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014889.

  3. Celis-Aguilar E, Castro-Urquizo A, Escobar-Aispuro L, Alarid- Coronel J, et al. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with marsupialization of the lacrimal sac. F1000Research 2019; 8: 259. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.17910.1.

  4. López ZS, Pla AM. Dacriocistitis aguda neonatal (1996- 2005). Rev Cuba Oftalmol 2006; 19 (2): 1.

  5. Robles-Bringas A, Angel-Arenas MT, Bustamante-Domínguez G. Experiencia en cirugía para dacriocistitis en el Hospital General de México. Rev Mex Oftalmo 2009; 83 (5): 293-5.

  6. Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V, Niparko JK, et al. Cummings otolaryngology: head and neck surgery. 6a ed. Philadelphia (Ph): Elsevier; 2014: 816-22.

  7. Cavada MN, Grayson JW, Sacks R. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2019; 7 (2): 141-6.

  8. Agramonte CI, Herrera SM, Gómez CC, Padilla CM. Efectividad de la cirugía ambulatoria en la dacriocistitis crónica. Rev Cuba Oftalmol 2004; 17 (1): 1.

  9. Vico E, Benítez del Castillo JM, Giménez RA, Fernández C, et al. Validación del índice de función lagrimal para el diagnóstico del ojo seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2004; 79 (6): 265-71.

  10. Roy D, Guevara N, Santini J, Castillo L. Endoscopic marsupialization of congenital nasolacrimal duct cyst with dacryocoele. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27 (3): 167-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00556.x.

  11. Jin H-R, Yeon J-Y, Choi M-Y. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: creation of a large marsupialized lacrimal sac. J Korean Med Sci 2006; 21 (4): 719-23. doi: 10.3346/ jkms.2006.21.4.719.

  12. Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S. Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86 (7): 792-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.7.792.

  13. Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmol 2003; 110 (1): 78-84. doi: 10.1016/s0161- 6420(02)01452-5.

  14. Cho K, Kim Y-D, Woo KI. Comparison of external and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for distal canalicular or common canalicular obstruction: A retrospective study of 44 lacrimal systems. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (4): 693-7. doi: 10.1111/coa.13358.

  15. Marcet MM, Kuk AKT, Phelps PO. Evidence-based review of surgical practices in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction and other new indications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014; 25 (5): 443-8. doi: 10.1097/ ICU.0000000000000084.

  16. Hiremath R, Satyamurthy KV, Kulkarni S, Jain A. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: raising the bar. Off Sci J Delhi Ophthalmol Soc 2019; 29 (4): 44-7. http://dx.doi. org/10.7869/djo.441.

  17. Mohamad S, Khan I, Shakeel M, Nandapalan V. Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95 (3): 196-9. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13511609957939.

  18. Unlu HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Guler C. Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111 (8): 704-9. doi: 10.1177/000348940211100809.

  19. Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Bassiouni A, Wormald PJ. Long-term outcomes in primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98 (12): 1678-80. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305510.

  20. Massegur H, Trias E, Ademà JM. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: modified technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (1): 39-46. doi: 10.1016/j. otohns.2003.08.011.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com