Tirado-Núñez AP, Gutiérrez-Rojo JF, Silva-Zatarain AN

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 981-984
PDF size: 210.54 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective is to evaluate the distance from the root of the upper central incisors to the incisive canal in malocclusions. Material and Methods: 2,200 pretreatment Cone Beam scans were collected, of the VATECH PAX-I3D tomograph, of patients who attended the Posgrado de Ortodoncia de la Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit in the period from August 2014 to October 2019. The sample consisted of 75 CT scans that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 25 CT scans of each malocclusion. Nine measurements were made to evaluate the roots in relation to the incisive canal. Results: in the measurements taken from the anterior face of the root to the posterior edge of the canal, statistically significant differences were found between the malocclusions. In the distance between the roots of the central incisors, in the distance of the posterior point of the roots of the upper central incisors, no statistically significant differences were found between the malocclusions. The size of the incisive canal was different in the malocclusions.

REFERENCES

1. Chung C, Choi Y, Kim K. Apprimation and contac to the maxillary central incisor roots with the incisive canal after maxium retraction with temporary anchorage devices: Report of 2 patients. Am J Orthod DO: 2015; 148 (3): 493-502.

2. Zainab H, Al-Ghurabi, Zainab M, Al.Bahrani. Radiographic assessment of nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019; 00 (00): 1-2.

3. Hakbilen S, Magat G. Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a turkish population by cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77 (3): 527-535.

4. Gönüil Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker- Acay M, Caliskan A, Sakarya G, et. Al. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variation: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2016; 97: 1165-1172.

5. Rocha A, García J, Gutiérrez F, Ruiz A, Muñoz A, López J Mariel J. Estudio Morfológico de Canales Nasopalatinos en Población Mexicana Mediante Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico. International Journal of Morphology. 2019; 37(4): 1272-1279.

6. Riera M, González W. El canal nasopalatino: ¿una limitante para la colocación de implantes? Presentación de un caso. Rev Mex Periodontol: 2017; VIII (1): 16-21.

7. Thakur A, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur V. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry: 2013; 43(4): 273.

8. Pan Y, Chen S. Contact f the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resortion after retraction with orthodonctic mini implants: A CBCT study. Angle Orthodontist. 2019; 89 (2): 200-205.

9. Cho E, Kim S, Choi Y, Kim K, Chung J.Morphologic evaluation of the incisive canal and its proximity to the maxillary central incisors using computed tomography images. Angle Orthodontist. 2016; 86(4): 571–576.

10. Dantas E, Nejaim Y, Cano L, Peyneau D, Bovi G, Oliveira M. Morphological evaluation of the nasopalatine canal in patients with different facial profiles and ages. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: 2018: 721-729.

11. Cazar M, Abril M, Palacios D, Abril M, Sibri C. Alteraciones anatómicas del conducto nasopalatino en pacientes dentados y desdentados en el sector anterosuperior utilizando tomografía computarizada de haz cónico. Acta Odont Col [en línea] 2018 [fecha de consulta: 25/03/2020]; 49 -57. Disponible en: https:// revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actaodontocol/ article/view/74157

12. Chatriyanuyoke P, Lu C, Suzuki Y, Lozada J, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan J, Goodacre C. Nasopalatine Canal Position Relative to the Maxillary Central Incisors: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment. Journal of Oral Implantology: 2012; 38(6): 713–717.