2015, Número 1
<< Anterior Siguiente >>
Rev Mex Neuroci 2015; 16 (1)
Tratamiento endovascular de aneurismas intracraneales rotos y no rotos: Nuestra experiencia en una década
Fernández-Martínez AM, Samper-Wamba JD, Valdivia-Ruiz J, Rosati S, Balboa-Arregui O
Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 42
Paginas: 16-29
Archivo PDF: 670.32 Kb.
RESUMEN
Introducción: Un aneurisma intracraneal es una dilatación
vascular cuya rotura supone una urgencia vital. Tanto el abordaje
quirúrgico como el endovascular son opciones terapéuticas válidas.
Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados del tratamiento endovascular en
aneurismas rotos y no rotos en diez años de experiencia.
Métodos: Se han analizado todos los pacientes diagnosticados de
aneurisma intracraneal y tratados mediante un abordaje endovascular
en nuestro centro durante diez años, de 2003 a 2012.
Resultados: Se embolizaron 45 aneurismas cerebrales no rotos
en 38 pacientes y 106 aneurismas rotos; un total de 151 aneurismas
cerebrales en 144 pacientes. La edad media de los pacientes fue
de 55.5±14.4 años con una distribución de 89 mujeres (61.5%)
y 55 hombres (38.5%). En los pacientes tratados de aneurisma
roto la estancia media en la UCI significativamente mayor que
en los pacientes tratados de aneurisma no roto (10.4 vs 1.6 días;
p‹ 0.001). Las complicaciones ocurridas en las primeras 24 horas
del procedimiento fueron dominantes en el grupo de pacientes
tratados de aneurisma roto (2.2% vs 35.8%; p‹ 0.001). El 97.8% de los
pacientes tratados de aneurisma no roto y el 72.6% de los tratados de
aneurisma roto eran independientes para las actividades básicas de
la vida diaria un año después del procedimiento.
Conclusiones: Los pacientes tratados de
aneurisma cerebral no roto mediante un abordaje
endovascular presentaron escasas complicaciones
y una recuperación temprana. Tanto en los
pacientes tratados de aneurisma cerebral roto
como no roto se logró un alto porcentaje de
pacientes independientes para las actividades
básicas de la vida diaria al cabo de un año.
REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)
Swietaszczyk C, Maciaczyk J, Tafilklawe M, Kasprzak HA. What is the origin of cerebral aneurysms?. Przegl Lek. 2004; 61: 115-9.
Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysms: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004; 35: 2500-05.
Meng H, Wang Z, Hoi Y, Gao L, Metaxa E, Swartz D, Kolega J. Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke 2007; 38: 1924-31.
Brisma JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Eng J Med. 2006; 355: 928-39.
Suarez JL, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Eng J Med. 2006; 354: 387-96.
Fontanarosa P. Recognition of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18: 1199-205.
Edlow J. Diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003; 21: 73-87.
Krings T, Mandell DM, Kiehl TR, Geibprasert S, Tymianski M, Alvarez H, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: from vessel wall pathology to therapeutic approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011; 7: 547-59.
Van Gijn J, Kerr R, Rinkel G. Subarachnoid hemorrhage. Lancet 2007; 369: 306-18.
Lagares A, Gómez P, Alén J, Arikan F, Sarabia R, Horcajadas, et al. A Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: group of study of cerebrovascular pathology of the Spanish society of neurosurgery management guideline. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2011; 22: 93-115.
Van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management. Brain 2001; 124: 249-78.
Kidwell CS, Chalela JA, Saver JL, Starkman S, Hill MD, Demchuk AM, et al. Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 2004; 292: 1823-30.
Tipper G, U-king-Im JM, Price SJ, Trivedi RA, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, et al. Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice CT angiography. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60: 565-72.
Fisher C, Kistler J, Davis J. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980; 6: 1-9.
Wiebers D, Whisnant J, Huston J, Meissner I, Brown R, Piepgras D, et al. International Study of Unruptured intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003; 362: 103-10.
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) collaborative group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2002; 360: 1267-74.
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Birks J, Ramzi N, Yarnold J, Sneade M, et al.; ISAT Collaborators. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage, death or dependence and standardized mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8: 427-33.
McDougall C, Spetzler R, Zabramski J, Partovi S, Hills N, Nakaji P, et al. The Barrow rupture trial.J Neurosurg. 2012; 116: 135-44.
Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2005; 2: 110-8.
Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as relates to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968; 28: 14-20.
Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60, II: prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957; 2: 200-15.
Cognard C, Pierot L, Anxionnat R, Ricolfi F. CLARITY Study Group. Results of embolization used as the first treatment choice in a consecutive nonselected population of ruptured aneurysms: clinical results of the Clarity GDC study. Neurosurgery 2011; 69: 837-41.
Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 994-1025.
Sakai N, Taki W, Yoshimura S, Hyogo T, Ezura M, Matsumoto Y. RESAT Study Group. Retrospective survey of endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysm in Japan: Retrospective Endovascular Subarachnoid Aneurysm Treatment (RESAT) study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010; 50: 961-5.
Piotin M, Blanc R, Spelle L, Mounayer C, Piantino R, Schmidt PJ, Moret J. Stent-Assisted Coiling of Intracranial aneurysms: Clinical and Angiographic Results in 216 Consecutive Aneurysms. Stroke 2010; 41: 110-5.
Seibert B, Tummala R, Chow R, Faridar A, Mousavi S, Divani A. Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes. Frontiers in Neurology 2011; 2: 45.
Eddleman C, Welch B, Vance A, Rickert K, White J, Pride G, et al. Endovascular Coils: properties, technical complications and salvage techniques. J Neurointervent Surg. 2012; 5: 104-9.
Johnston S, Higashida R, Barrow D, Caplan L, Dion J, Hademenos G, et al. Recommendations for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a statement for healthcare professionals from the committee on cerebrovascular imaging of the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular radiology. Stroke 2002; 33: 2536-44.
Pierot L, Spelle L, Vitry F; ATENA investigators. Immediate anatomic results after the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: analysis of ATENA series. AJNR 2010; 31: 140-4.
Etminan N, Beseoglu K, Barrow D, Bederson J, Brown R, Connolly E, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on assessment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: proposal of an International Research Group. Stroke 2014; 45: 1523-30.
Kallmes D, Ding Y, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis D, Cloft H. A new endoluminal, flow disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007; 38: 2346-52.
Van der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer M, Molyneux A, Clarke M, Van Gijn J, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005.
Qureshi AI, Janardhan V, Hanel RA, Lanzino G. Comparison of endovascular and surgical treatments for intracranial aneurysms: an evidence-based review. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6: 816-25.
Darsaut T, Kotowski M, Raymond J. How to choose clipping versus coiling in treating intracranial aneurysms. Neurochirurgie 2012; 58: 61-7.
Kotowski M, Naggara O, Darsaut T, Raymond J. Systematic reviews of the literature on clipping and coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurochirurgie 2012; 58: 125-31.
Higashida RT, Lahue BJ, Torbey MT, Hopkins LN, Leip E, Hanley DF. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR 2007; 28: 146-51.
Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, McDougall CG. Usefulness of the neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results and initial (3-6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 1191-202.
Bonneville F, Sourour N, Biondi A. Intracranial aneurysms: an overview. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2006; 16: 371-82.
Milosevic Medenica S. Endovascular treatment of wide neck, ruptured and unruptured aneurysms without supporting devices. A single center experience. Neuroradiol J. 2013; 26: 97-105.
Gory B, Turjman F. Endovascular treatment of 404 intracranial aneurysms treated with nexus detachable coils: short-term and mid-term results from a prospective, consecutive, European multicenter study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156: 831-7.
Tykocki T, Kostyra K, Czyż M, Kostkiewicz B. Four years trends in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms in Poland in 2009-2012. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156: 861-8.
Galal A, Bahrassa F, Dalfino JC, Boulos AS. Stent-assisted treatment of unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic outcome. Br J Neurosurg. 2013; 27: 607-16.