medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System

2006, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Acta Med 2006; 4 (1)


Colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética

Rodríguez-Asiain M, Gómez-Pérez MG, Sánchez-Cortazar J, Téliz-Meneses MA, Angulo-Suárez M, Vicente-Andrews Y

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 59
Paginas: 33-41
Archivo PDF: 152.18 Kb.


RESUMEN

La colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética (CPRM) descrita por primera vez en 1991 por BK Wallner en Alemania, es una técnica de imagen que utiliza la resonancia magnética (RM) para visualizar los líquidos estáticos o de movimiento muy lento que producen imágenes del árbol pancreatobiliar similares a las obtenidas por métodos radiográficos invasivos como la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE). Ha sido aceptada ampliamente para evaluar las enfermedades de las vías biliares o del conducto pancreático de una manera no invasiva. Estudios recientes demuestran que la CPRM es comparable o más útil que otras técnicas como ultrasonido, TC y CPRE para el estudio de coledocolitiasis, obstrucción maligna de los conductos biliares o pancreáticos, anomalías congénitas y pancreatitis crónica, este método ofrece un excelente contraste tisular y alto detalle anatómico.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181: 805-808.

  2. Barish MA, Soto JA. MR cholangiopancreatography: techniques and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 1295-1303. [31].

  3. Mark AB, Semelka RC. MR Imaging abbreviations, definitions, and descriptions: A review. Radiology 1999; 213: 647-662.

  4. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 295-300.

  5. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 459-464.

  6. Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sackmann M, Thoeni RF, Schurig J, Holl J et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1998; 206: 657-664.

  7. Keogan MT, Edelman RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. State of the art. Radiology 2001; 220: 310-320.

  8. Wielopolski PA, Jochen G, Damian R, Matthis O. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional, segmented, echo-planar imaging and volume rendering. Radiology 1999; 210: 247-252.

  9. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207: 21-32.

  10. Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999; 178: 480-484.

  11. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with failed or inadequate ERCP. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 1527-1533.

  12. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996; 199: 91-98.

  13. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 459-464.

  14. Yoshihiko F, Fumito F, Michiro S, Masayuki N. Pancreatic duct: Morphologic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2002; 222: 674-680.

  15. Ti T, Yasutuki Y, Akihiko A. Pancreaticobiliary ductal system: Value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiopancreatography for postoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000; 215: 81-88.

  16. Laghi A, Pavone P, Catalano C, Rossi M, Panebianco V, Alfani D et al. MR cholangiography of late biliary complications after liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1541-1546.

  17. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Broglia L, Panebianco V, Messina A et al. MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 807-811.

  18. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J et al. Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000; 215: 358-364.

  19. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 847-850.

  20. Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K, Outwater EK. Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes-value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000; 214: 173-181.

  21. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977; 134: 263-269.

  22. De Backer AI, Vad den Abbeele K, De Schepper AM, Van Baale A. Choledochocele: diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 2000; 25: 508-510.

  23. Matos C, Nicaise N, Deviere J, Cassart M, Metens T, Struyven J et al. Choledochal cysts: comparison of findings at MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in eight patients. Radiology 1998; 209: 443-448.

  24. Alvin C Silva, Jeremy L, Amy K. MR Cholangiopancreatography: Improved ductal distention with intravenous morphine administration. Radiographics 2004; 24: 677-687.

  25. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199: 521-527.

  26. Nicaise N, Pellet O, Metens T et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: interest of IV secretin administration in the evaluation of pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 16.

  27. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, Guibaud L, Atri M, Barkun AN. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199: 99-103.

  28. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197: 109-115.

  29. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Barkun AN et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 209: 435-442.

  30. Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlmann M, Magnuson T. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1441-1445.

  31. Ernst O, Asselah T, Sergent G et al. MR cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 1027-1030

  32. Kenneth M, Mary T, Kelly S, Robert A. Radiologic manifestations of sclerosing cholangitis with emphasis on MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiographics 2000; 20: 959-975.

  33. Ann S, Mary A, Kevin J. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Evaluation with MR cholangiography-A case-control study. Radiology 2000; 215: 71-80.

  34. Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Stehling MK, Weinzierl M, Reiser M. Choledocholithiasis after Billroth II surgery: MR cholangiographic diagnosis. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 520-523.

  35. Lecense R, Patrice T, Patrice M. Acute pancreatitis: Interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology 1999; 211: 727-735.

  36. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, Miller FH, Chai JL, Adams DF. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 1999; 210: 605-610.

  37. Ichikawa T, Sou H, Araki T, Arbab AS, Yoshikawa T, Ishigame K et al. Duct-penetrating sign at MRCP: usefulness for differentiating inflammatory pancreatic mass from pancreatic carcinomas. Radiology 2001; 221: 107-116.

  38. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H et al. Pancreatitis: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography in children. Radiology 1997; 203: 411-415.

  39. Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Ectors N et al. Nonalcoholic duct-destructive chronic pancreatitis: imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 643-647.

  40. Johnson PT, Outwater EK. Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 213-218.

  41. Manfredi R, Guido C, Maria G. Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: Dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000; 214: 849-855.

  42. Manfredi R, MD idiopatic chronic pancreatitis in children: MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin administration. Radiology 2002; 224: 675-682.

  43. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H et al. Pancreatitis: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography in children. Radiology 1997; 203: 411-415.

  44. Hardome H, Tomoaki I, Hironobu S. The Pearl Necklace sign: An imaging sign of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder at MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2003; 227: 80-88.

  45. Mi-Suk Park. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: Findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 2004; 233: 234-240.

  46. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R, Calhoun PS, Bliss DF, Scherrer A et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 1. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1427-1431.

  47. Sheridan MB, Ward J, Guthrie JA, Spencer JA, Craven CM, Wilson D et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 483-490.

  48. Pracci C. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas: A pictoral Essay. Radiographics 1999; 19: 1447-1463.

  49. Irie H, Honda H, Aibe H et al. MR cholangiopancreatographic differentiation of benign and malignant intraductal mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1403-1408.

  50. Ichikawa T, Sou H, Araki T, Arbab AS, Yoshikawa T, Ishigame K et al. Duct-penetrating sign at MRCP: usefulness for differentiating inflammatory pancreatic mass from pancreatic carcinomas. Radiology 2001; 221: 107-116.

  51. Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, Weitz M, Schilling D, Riemann JF. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study. Lancet 2000; 356: 190-193.

  52. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG, Maresca G, Vecchioli A, Colagrande C et al. Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000; 214: 849-855.

  53. Sica GT, Braver J, Michael J, Frank H, Jessie L .Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 1999; 210: 605-610.

  54. Karawasa E, Goldberg HI, Moss AA, Federle MP, London SS. CT pancreatogram in carcinoma of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1983; 148: 489-493.

  55. Chan Y-L, Chan ACW, Lam WWM et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 200: 85-89.

  56. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, DiSario JA et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: A825.

  57. Yuji Watanabe, Masako D, Takayoshi I. Pseudo-obstruction of the extrapancreatic bile duct due to artifact from arterial pulsatile compression: A diagnostic pitfall of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000; 214: 856-860.

  58. Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, Yoshimitsu K, Aibe H, Shinozaki K et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001; 21: 23-37.

  59. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21: 385-394.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com