medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-4360 (Impreso)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C

2013, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2013; 4 (2)


Manejo de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria por recesión gingival. Uso combinado de Pro-Argin™ e injerto de tejido conectivo subepitelial: Reporte de un caso

Cepeda BJA

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 67-72
Archivo PDF: 278.66 Kb.


RESUMEN

Las recesiones gingivales han sido consideradas constantemente como un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria. A pesar de que han sido descritas diversas metodologías para aliviar los síntomas de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria, aún persiste el conflicto clínico de resolver el síntoma, mas no la causa o el factor predisponente, como en el caso de una recesión gingival. El presente artículo presenta un caso clínico del tratamiento de recesiones gingivales adyacentes bajo la técnica de túnel con injerto de tejido conectivo subepitelial en una paciente con historial de hipersensibilidad dentinaria severa e incomodidad estética por la misma recesión gingival. La intención del artículo es proveer evidencia clínica sobre el manejo de una recesión gingival con tejido conectivo subepitelial, sobre una superficie radicular que, de acuerdo con la literatura científica, debe tener los túbulos dentinarios ocluidos, debido a la terapia con arginina al 8% y carbonato de calcio (Colgate Sensitive Pro-Alivio®).


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Addy M. Dentin hypersensitivity: New perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J. 2002; 52 (Suppl 5): 367-375.

  2. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Haywood VB, Collins MC, Drisko CL. Dentin hypersensitivity: consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. Inside Dentistry. 2008: 4 (9): 1-35.

  3. Cummins D. Dentin hypersensitivity: From diagnosis to a breakthrough therapy for everyday sensitivity relief. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20: 1-9.

  4. Drisko C. Dentin Hypersensitivity-dental hygiene and periodontal considerations. Int Dent J. 2002; 52: 385-393.

  5. Strassler HE, Drisko CL, Alexander DC. Dentin Hypersensitivity: It’s inter-relationship to gingival recession and acid erosion. Inside Dentistry. 2008; 4: 1-39.

  6. Brännström M. A hydrodynamic mechanism in the transmission of pain production stimuli through dentine. In: Anderson DJ. Sensory mechanisms in dentine. Oxford: pergammon Press; 1963: 73-79.

  7. Cummins D. Recent advances in dentin hypersensitivity: clinically proven treatments for instant and lasting sensitivity relief. Am J Dent. 2010; 23: 3A-13A.

  8. Li Y, Lee S, Zhang YP, Delgado E, DeVizio W, Mateo LR. Comparison of clinical efficacy of three toothpastes in reducing dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Dent. 2011; 22 (4): 113-120.

  9. Lavender SA, Petrou I, Heu R, Stranick MA, Cummins D, Sullivan R. Mode of action studies on a new desensitizing dentifrice containing 8.0% arginine, a high cleaning calcium carbonate system and 1450 ppm fluoride. Am J Dent. 2010; 23: 14A-19A.

  10. Hamlin D, Mateo LR, Dibart S, Delgado E, Zhang YP, DeVizio W. Comparative efficacy of two treatment regimens combining in-office and at-home programs for dentin hypersensitivity relief: a 24-week clinical study. Am J Dent. 2012; 25 (3): 146-152.

  11. Schiff T, Delgado E, Zhang YP, Cummins D, DeVizio W, Mateo LR. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing instant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2009; 22: 8A-15A.

  12. Cepeda Bravo JA, Pozos Guillén AJ, Zermeño Pérez M, Vázquez Vázquez FC. Clinical efficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8.0% arginine and calcium carbonate. Revista ADM. 2013; 70 (2): 68-75.

  13. Petrou I, Heu R, Stranick M, Lavender S, Zaidel L, Cummins D, Sullivan RJ, Hsueh C, Gimzewski JK. A breakthrough therapy for dentin hypersensitivity: how dental products containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate work to deliver effective relief of sensitive teeth. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20 (1): 23-31.

  14. Miller PD. Regenerative and reconstructive periodontal plastic surgery. Mucogingival surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1988; 32 (2): 287-306.

  15. Smith RG. Gingival recession. Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24 (3): 201-205.

  16. Baker P, Spedding C. The aetiology of gingival recession. Dent Update. 2002; 29 (2): 59-62.

  17. Harris RJ, The connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft: the results of 100 consecutively-treated defects. J Periodontol. 1994; 65 (5): 448-461.

  18. Allen A. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. Rationale and technique. Intl J of Periodontics and Restorative Dent. 1994; 14: 217-227.

  19. Zabalegui I, Sicua A, Cambra J et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepitelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 1999; 19: 199.

  20. Caffesse RG, De La Rosa M, Garza M, Travers AM, Mondragon J, Weltman R. Citric acid demineralization and subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 568-572.

  21. Mariotti A. Efficacy of chemical root surface modifiers in the treatment of periodontal disease. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003; 8 (1): 205-226.

  22. Haeri A, Serio FG. Mucogingival surgical procedures: a review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30 (7): 475-483.

  23. Schiff T, Dotson M, Cohen S, De Vizio W, Volpe A. Efficacy of a dentifrice containing potassium nitrate, soluble pyrophosphate, PVM/MA copolymer, and sodium floride on dentinal hypersensitivity: A twelve week clinical study. J Clin Dent. 1994; 5: 87-92.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com