2011, Número 5
<< Anterior Siguiente >>
Arch Med Actual Trac Gen Inf 2011; 3 (5)
Utilidad de las técnicas moleculares de detección de VPH en el control y prevención del cáncer cervicouterino
Gutiérrez RR
Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 64
Paginas: 16-23
Archivo PDF: 169.32 Kb.
RESUMEN
La infección persistente con tipos oncogénicos del virus de papiloma humano (VPH) ha sido demostrada como un factor necesario para el desarrollo y progresión de neoplasia intraepitelial cervical (NIC) y del cáncer invasor. Considerando dicha asociación, se ha propuesto la incorporación de pruebas de detección viral altamente sensibles y especificas en los programas de tamizaje, como son las técnicas de detección de DNA. Actualmente, se encuentran disponibles una gran variedad de pruebas basadas en la detección de DNA y RNA viral, sin embargo, los dos métodos más utilizados en la detección de VPH carcinogénico son la hibridación con amplificación de señal (CH2) y la amplificación de DNA mediante la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) utilizando un par de oligonulceiotidos de amplio espectro, seguida de una hibridación con sondas especificas para tipificación de VPH. Los protocolos que emplean PCR se caracterizan por ser más sensibles y específicos y permiten la detección de infecciones latente sub-clínica y activa por VPH, así como determinar el o los genotipos específicos de VPH que causan dicha infección. La principal utilidad de las pruebas de detección de VPH, es que pueden conducirnos a una detección temprana de lesiones de alto riesgo NIC II/III y recurrencia post-tratamiento, no identificadas por citología; permiten especiar los intervalos del tamizaje para las mujeres que no presenten infección por VPH de alto riesgo y finalmente, invertir mejor los recursos para el seguimiento de las pacientes que conforman los grupos de riesgo.
REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)
Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo y col. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2007;370(9590):890–907.
Franceschi S, Cuzick J, Herrero R y col. EUROGIN 2008 roadmap on cervical cancer prevention. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(10):2246–2255.
Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N y col. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002;55(4):244–265.
Qiao YL, Sellors JW, Eder PS y col. A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China. Lancet Oncol 2008;9(10):929–936.
Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Thomson C y col. HPV testing in combinationwith liquidbasedcytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(7):672–682.
Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal Ly col. Human papillomavirus DNAtesting for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled implementation trial. Lancet 2007;370(9601):1764–1772.
Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S y col. Efficacy of HPV DNAtesting with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101(2):88–99.
Gravitt PE, Schiffman M, Solomon D y col. Acomparison of linear array and hybrid capture 2 for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus and cervical precancer in ASCUS-LSIL triage study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(5):1248–1254.
The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(5):397–402.
Hinselman H, Verbesserung der Inspecktionmöglichkeiten von Vulva. Vagina and Portio. Münch Med Wschr 1925;72:1733-1736
Almirón S, Navarro S, Rojas M y col.Correlación histopatológica de la expresión por el virus de papiloma humano en lesiones premalignas y malignas de cuello uterino. Revista de postgrado de la vía cátedra de medicina 2003;134:19-12.
NADNa K, Mc Crory DC, Myers ER y col. Accuracy of the Papanicolau test in screening for DNAfollow-up of cervical cytology abnormalities; a systematic revie. An Intern Med 2000 May; 132(10):810-819.
Fahey MT, Irwig L y Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of papa test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 1995 Apr; 141(7):680-689.
Shiffman M, Wentzensen N, Wacholder S y col. Human Papillomavirus Testing in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst 2011; 103(5):1-16
Ault K. Human papilloma virus infections: diagnosis, treatment, and hope for a vaccine. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2003;30:809-817.
Gravitt P, Burk R, Lorincz A, Herrero R y col. A comparison between real-time polimerase chain reaction and hybrid capture 2 for for human papillomavirus DNA quantitation. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark Prev 2003;12:477-484.
Lorincz A y Anthony J. Advances in HPV detection by Hibrid Caprute R . Pap Report 2001;12(6)145-154.
Burd E. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:1-17
Schiffman M, Herrero R, Hildesheim Ay col. HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: results from women in a high-risk province of Costa Rica. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283: 87–93.
Gravitt PE, Schiffman M, Solomon D y col. Acomparison of linear array and hybrid capture 2 for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus and cervical precancer in ASCUS-LSIL triage study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(5):1248–1254.
Peyton CL, Schiffman M, Lorincz AT y col. Comparison of PCR- and hybrid capture-based human papillomavirus detection systems using multiple cervical specimen collection strategies. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36: 3248–3254.
Terry G, Ho L, Londesborough P y col. Detection of high risk HPV types by the hybrid capture 2 test. J Med Virol 2001;65:155–162.
Lörincz A. Screening for cervical cancer: new alternatives and research. Sal Pub Mex 2003; 45:376-387.
Lorincz A y Anthony J. Hybrid CaptureR: a system for nucleic acid detection by signal amplification technology. In: Van Dyke K, Van Dyke C, Woodfork K, ed. Luminescence biotechnology: instruments and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002: 149-158.
Iftner T y Villa L. Chapter 12: Human papillomavirus technologies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31:80-88.
Stoler MH. HPV for cervical cancer screening: is the era of the molecular pap smear upon us?. J Histochem Cytochem 2001;49:1197-1198
Herrington C. Self testing for human papillomaviruses. J Clin Pathol 2002;55:408-409
Monsonego J, Bohbot JM, Pollini G y col. Performance of the Roche AMPLICOR human papillomavirus(HPV) test in prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with abnormal PAPsmear. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:160–168.
Sandri M, Lentati TP, Beninii E y col. Comparison of the Digene HC2 assay and the Roche AMPLICOR human papillomavirus (HPV) test for detection of high-risk HPV genotypes in cervical samples. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:2141–2146.
van Ham MA, Bakkers JM, Harbers GK y col.. Comparison of two commercial assays for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical scrape specimens: validation of the Roche AMPLICOR HPV test as a means to screen for HPV genotypes associated with a higher risk of cervical disorders. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:2662–2667.
Wahlström C, Ifner T, Dillner J y col. Population-based study of screening test performance indices of three human papillomavirus DNA tests. J Med Virol 2007 Aug;79(8):1169-75.
Mo LZ, Monnier-Benoit, S, Kantelip B y col. Comparison for AMPLICOR and Hybrid Capture II assays for high risk HPV detection in normal and abnormal liquidbased cytology: Use of INNO-LiPAGenotyping assay to screen the discordant results. J Clin Virology 2008; 41:104–110.
De Francesco MA, Gargiulo F, Schreiber C y col. Comparison of the AMPLICOR human papillomavirus test and the hybrid capture 2 assay for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in women with abnormal PAP smear. J Virol Methods 2008 Jan;147(1):10-7.
Stevens MP, Garland SM, Rudland E y col. Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 assay and Roche AMPLICOR and LINEAR ARRAY human papillomavirus (HPV) tests in detecting high-risk HPV genotypes in specimens from women with previous abnormal Pap smear results. J Clin Microbiol 2007 Jul;45(7):2130-2137.
Carozzi F, Bisanzi S, Sani C y col. Agreement between the AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus and diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical disease. J Clin Microbiol 2007 Feb;45(2):364-9.
Schlecht NF, Kulaga S, Robitaille J y col. Persistent human papillomavirus infection as a predictor of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia JAMA2001;286(24):3106-14..
Kleter B, van Doorn LJ, Schrauwen Ly col. Development and clinical evaluation of a highly sensitive PCR-reverse hybridization line probe assay for detection and identification of anogenital human papillomavirus. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37(8):2508-2517.
Janet G, Baseman GJ y Koutsky AL. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J Clin Virol 2005;32:16-24.
Wallin KL, Wiklund F, Angstrom T y col. Type´specific persistence of human papillomavirus DNAbefore the development of invasive cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1633-1638.
Coutleé F, Rouleau D, Petignat P Enhanced Detection and Typing of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNAin Anogenital Samples with PGMY Primers and the Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test. J Clin Micobiol 2006;44(6):1998–2006
Kornegay RJ, Roger M, Davies OP y col. International proficiency study of a consensus L1 PCR assay for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA: evaluation of accuracy and intralaboratory agreement. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41 (3): 1080-1086
Liang RQ, Tan CYy Ruan KC.Colorimetric detection of protein microarrays based on nanogold probe coupled with silver enhancement. J Immunol Methods 2004;285 (2): 157-163.
Guschin D, Yershov G, Zaslavsky A y col. Manual manufacturing of oligonucleotide, DNA, and proteins microchips. Anal Biochem 1997;250(2):203-211.
Wentzensen N, Bergeron C, Cas F y col. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer 2007;111(1):58–66.
Denton KJ, Bergeron C, Klement P y col. The sensitivity and specificity of p16(INK4a) cytology vs HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical disease in the triage of ASC-US and LSILpap cytology results. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;134(1):12–21.
Lazcano PE, Alonso RP, Ruiz MJA, Hernández AM. Recomendaciones para los programas de detección oportuna del cáncer cervicouterino en los países en vías de desarrollo: necesidad de equidad y desarrollo tecnológico.2ª edición. En Cáncer cervicouterino diagnóstico, prevención y control. Patricia Alonso, Eduardo C. Lazcano y Mauricio Hernández.2006; 258-259.
Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Womack SM y col. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer. JAMA2002; 287(18):2372-2381.
Belinson J, Qiao YL, Pretorius R y col. Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: across- sectional comparative trial multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:439-444.
Ratnam S, Franco EL y Ferenczy A. Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening of cervical cancer precursors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:945-951.
Khan MJ, Castle PE, Lorincz AT y col. The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. J Natl Cancer Ins. 2005;97(14):1072–1079.
Dillner J, Rebolj M, Birembaut Py col. Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a1754.
Jeronimo J, Schiffman M. Colposcopy at a crossroads. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195(2):349–353
The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance /Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions : baseline data from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(5)397-402.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cellsof undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188(6):1383–1392.
Arbyn M, Buntinx F, van Ranst M y col. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96(4):280–293.
Toplis PJ, Casemore V, Hallman N y col. Evaluation of colposcopy in the postmenopausal woman. Br. J. Obstet Gyneacol 1986;93:843-847.
Campion MJ y Sedlacek TV. Colposcopy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993;20:153-163.
Nobbenhuis MA, Walboomers JM, Helmerhorst TJ y col. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: Aprospective study. Lancet 1999;354(9172):20-25
Riveiro JC. Importancia de la tipificación del virus del papiloma humano (VPH) Rev Venez Oncol 2002;14(3):175-177
Nobbenhuis MA, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ y col. Addition of high-risk HPV testing improves the current guidelines on follow-up after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Cancer 2001;84(6):796-801.
Cuzick J y Sasieni P. Estimates of the cost impact of introducing HPV testing into a cervical screening programme. In: Franco E, Monsonegro J, eds. New developments in cervical cancer screening and prevention. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997: 364-372.
Dillner L y Dillner J. International quality assurance of human papillomavirus testing. Cent Eur J Public Health 2008;16:16–20.
Ferguson M, Wilkinson DE, Zhou T. WHO Meeting on the standardization of HPV assays and the role of the WHO HPV. Laboratory Network in supporting vaccine introduction held on 24–25 January 2008, Geneva, Switzerland. Vaccine 2009;27:337–47.
Sasieni P, Castanon A y Cuzick J. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(3):525–529.