2006, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Arch Cardiol Mex 2006; 76 (4)
Clinical variables related with in-stent restenosis late regression after bare metal coronary stenting
Alcocer A, Moreno R, Hernández R, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Conde C, Alfonso F, Sabaté M, Escaned J, Bañuelos C, Azcona L, Macaya C
Language: English
References: 31
Page: 390-396
PDF size: 111.04 Kb.
ABSTRACT
In-stent restenosis (ISR) has an incidence between 20% and 30% using bare metal stents. ISR late regression phenomenon (ISRLR) has been previously described, but clinical variables related with this phenomenon remain unclear. The aim of the study was to identify the variables related with ISRLR.
Methods: We identified from our data base 30 patients between November 1995 and September 2002 that fulfilled the following criteria: 1) Documented ISR at follow-up angiography (CA-1); 2) treated medically; and 3) Referred for a second follow-up angiography (CA-2) at least 3 months after CA-1. ISRLR was defined as a › 0.2 mm increase in MLD between CA-1 and CA-2, calculated as the 2-fold of our inter-observer variability. ISR late progression was defined as a › 0.2 mm decrease in minimum lumen diameter (MLD) between CA-1 and CA-2.
Results: At the time of CA-2 only 2 patients (6.7%) had symptoms related with the previously stented vessel. We found a mean MLD of 1.03 ± 0.34 mm and 1.54 ± 0.48 mm at CA-1 and CA-2 respectively (DMLD = 0.51 ± 0.34 mm; p 0.001). Twenty four patients (80.0%) had ISRLR. Two variables were related to the presence or absence ISRLR: Current smoking at the time of coronary stenting (70.8% vs 20.0% respectively, p = 0.026) and acute coronary syndrome as clinical indication for coronary stenting (and 83.5% vs 40.0% respectively, p = 0.029).
Conclusion: ISRLR is a frequent phenomenon in patients with ISR treated medically, probably contributing to the benign long-term clinical outcome that has been previously described in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ISR. Current smoking at the time of coronary stenting and acute coronary syndrome as clinical indication for coronary stenting are associated with this phenomenon.
REFERENCES
Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickz G, et al: A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: (8): 489-495.
Moreno R, Fernandez C, Alfonso F, Hernandez RA, Perez-Vizcaino MJ, Escaned J, et al: Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels: a meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(11): 1964-1972.
Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, Geuskens R, de Feyter PJ, van den Bran M, et al: Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3 and 4 months. Circulation 1988; 77: 361-371.
Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, Mioka S, Ueno K, Yokoi H, et al: Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow up of 229 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 616-623.
Mehta VY, Jorgensen MB, Raizner AE, Wolde-Tsadik G, Mhrer PR, Mansukhani P: Spontaneous Regression of Restenosis: An Angiographic Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 696-702.
Ormiston JA, Stewart FM, Roche HG, Webber BJ, Whitlock RM, Webster MW: Late Regression of the Dilated Site After Coronary Angioplasty: A 5-year Quantitative Angiographic study. Circulation 1997; 96: 468-474.
Kimura T, Yokoi H, Yoshihisa N, Tamura T, Kaburagi S, Sawada Y, et al : Three year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 561-566.
Hermiller JB, Fry ET, Peters TF, Orr CM, Van Tassel J, Waller B: Late coronary artery stenosis regression within the Gianturco Roubin intracoronary stent. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 247-251.
Meireles GC, Lemos PA, Ambrose JA, Ribeiro E, Horta PE, Perin M, et al: Luminal recovery from six to twelve months after implantation of “thicker strut” coronary stents. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93(2): 210-213.
Sadamatsu K, Tashiro H, Tanaka E, Yamamoto K: Clinical and angiographic predictors of luminar changes beyond 6 months alter implantation of thicker strut coronary stents. Circ J 2005; 69(1): 35-38.
Morice MC, Serruys P, Sousa J, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M et al: A randomized comparison of a sirolimus- eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(23): 1773-1780.
Waksman R, Raizner A, Yeung AC, Lanski AJ, Vandertier L: Use of localized intracoronary bð radiation in the treatment of in-stent restenosis: the INHIBIT randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 551-557.
Alfonso F, Hernandez R, Goicolea J, Segovia J, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Banuelos C, et al: Coronary stenting for acute coronary dissection after coronary angioplasty: implications of residual. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 989-995.
Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, Mountanban van Swinjdregt, Lehmann KG, Ozaki, et al: Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation 1995; 91: 2174-2183.
Asakura M, UedaY, Nanto S, Hirayama A, Adachi T, Kitakaze M, et al: Remodeling of In-stent Neointima, Which Became Thinner and Transparent Over 3 Years. Serial Angiographic and Angioscopic Follow-up. Circulation 1998; 97: 2003-2006.
Kimura T, Yokoi H, Yoshihisa N, Tamura T, Kaburagi S, Sawada Y, et al : Three year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 561-566.
Arora RR, Konrad K, Badhwar K, Hollman J: Restenosis after transluminal coronary angioplasty: a risk factor analysis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 1990; 19: 17-22.
Melkert R, Violaris AG, Serruys PW: Luminal narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A multivariate analysis of clinical, procedural and lesion related factors affecting long term angiographic outcome in the PARK study. J Invasive Cardiology 1994; 6: 160-171.
Kotamaki M, Laustiola K, Syvanne M, Heikkila J: Influence of continued smoking and some biological risk factors on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Intern Med 1996; 240: 293-301.
Galan KM, Deligonul U, Morton MJ, Chaitman BR, Vandormael MJ: Increased frequency of restenosis in patients continuing to smoke cigarettes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 260-263.
Violaris AG, Thury A, Regar E, Melker R, Serruys PW: Influence of a history of smoking on short term (six month) clinical and angiographic outcome after successful coronary angioplasty. Heart 2000; 84: 299-306.
Leimgruber PP, Roubin G, Hollman J, Cotsonis GA, Meir B, Douglas JS, et al: Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single vessel disease. Circulation 1986; 73: 710-717.
Thijs Plokker HW, Ernst SM, Bal ET, Peeremboom PJ, Mast EJ, van den Berg EG, et al: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina pectoris refractory to medical therapy: long-term clinical and angiographic results. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988; 14: 15-18.
De Groote P, Bauters Ch, McFadden E, Lablanch JM, Leroy F, Bertrand ME: Local Lesion-Related Factors and Restenosis After Coronary Angioplasty: Evidence From a Quantitative Angiographic Study in Patients UIT Unstable Angina Undergoing Double-Vessel Angioplasty. Circulation 1995; 91: 968-972.
Isner JM, Kearney M, Bortman S, Passeri J: Apoptosis in human atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 2703-2711.
Bauriedel G, Schluckebier S, Hutter R, Welsch U, Kandolf R, Luderitz B, et al: Apoptosis in restenosis versus stable-angina atherosclerosis: implications for the pathogenesis of restenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18: 1132-1139.
Hernández RA, Macaya C, Iñiguez A, Alfonso F, Goicolea J, Fernandez-Ortiz A, et al: Midterm outcome of patients with asymptomatic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1402-1409
Chenu PC, Schroeder E, Krémer R, Marhandise B: Long-term outcome of patients with asymptomatic restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 1209-1211.
Ruygrok PN, Webster MW, Valk V, van Es GA, Ormiston JA, Morel MA, et al: Clinical and angiographic factors associated with asymptomatic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2001; 104: 2289-2294.
Lee JH, Lee CW, Park SW, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Rhee KS, et al: Long-term follow-up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate non critical in-stent restenosis. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24: 551-555.
Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, et al: Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100: 1872-1878.