Valenciano VJI, Hernández SF, Ibarra AIP

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 17-26
PDF size: 137.79 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The satisfaction of students regarding the quality of the educational service tends to be a very subjective criterion and to depend on emotional states, but now there is the situation of a health emergency that has interrupted all human activities including the educational process in health areas. Objective: To know the level of satisfaction of social service providers in health units and in times of pandemic. Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional, observational. Material and methods: Data were obtained from a questionnaire and sociodemographic and reactive information to measure the level of satisfaction of social service providers in medical areas. Bioethical aspects: No bioethical axis was compromised, all measures were taken for the protection of data from the database. Results: 26 questionnaires from a total of 28 social service providers were reviewed. The predominant sex was female, the careers with the highest representation are Nursing and Dental Surgeon. 65% perceive it as an optimal clinical field to learn. Conclusions: The vast majority feel satisfied with their activities, acquisition of skills and attitudes. The perception of satisfaction is very satisfactory both in the receiving unit and in general at the institution and they stated that their expectations were met and they are dissatisfied with the amount of the scholarship.

REFERENCES

1. NOM-009-SSA3-2013. Educación en Salud. Criterios para la utilización de los establecimientos para la atención médica como campos clínicos para la prestación del servicio de medicina y estomatología.

2. García-Ramos M, Luján-López ME, Martínez-Corona MA. Satisfacción laboral del personal de salud. Rev Enferm IMSS. 2007; 15 (2): 63-72.

3. García-Hernández Y, Martínez-García MD, Rivera-López MI, Gutiérrez-Fragoso G. Satisfacción laboral del personal de enfermería en dos instituciones de salud públicas: caso Hidalgo, México. Instituto Tecnológico Superior del Oriente del Estado de Hidalgo; 2016. pp. 26-42.

4. Urquiza R. Satisfacción laboral, y calidad del servicio de salud. Rev Méd La Paz. 2012; 18 (2): 65-69.

5. Norbario MC. Satisfacción estudiantil de la calidad del servicio educativo en la formación profesional de las carreras técnicas de baja y alta demanda [Tesis]. Perú: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2018.

6. Herzberg F. Satisfacción laboral: encuesta de evaluación. Estados Unidos: 1967.

7. González-Contreras A, Pérez-Villalobos C, Hechenleitner M, Vaccarezza-Garrido G, Toirkens-Niklitschek J. Satisfacción académica y prácticas pedagógicas percibidas por estudiantes de salud de Chile. FEM. 2019; 22 (3): 103-107.

8. Pavón-León P, Gogeascoechea-Trejo MC, Blázquez-Morales MSL, Blázquez-Domínguez CR. Satisfacción del personal de salud en un hospital Universitario. Salud en Tabasco. 2011; 17 (1-2); 13-31.

9. Puleo Puleo D, García Rojas E, Serrano Rivera MA. Satisfacción de estudiantes de Medicina con un Hospital Simulado en Universidad del Valle de México. Horiz Sanitario. 2016; 15 (3): 135-141.

10. Carrillo-García C, Martínez-Roche ME, Gómez-García CI, Meseguer-de-Pedro M. Satisfacción laboral de los profesionales sanitarios de un Hospital Universitario: análisis general y categorías laborales. Anal Psicol. 2015; 31 (2): 645-650.

11. Lorgelly PK, Adler A. Impact of a global pandemic on health technology assessment. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020; 18 (3): 339-343. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00590-9.

12. Mian A, Khan S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. BMC Med. 2020; 18: 100.

13. Reynés-Manzur JN, Vázquez-Rivera M, Velázquez-Challa S, Kuri-Ayala S, Cravioto-Quintana P, Galván-Castillo F et al. Gestión del aprendizaje en tiempos de COVID-19. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2020; 41 (Suppl: 1): 137-143.

14. Schwamm LH, Estrada J, Erskine A, Licurse A. Virtual care: new models of caring for our patients and workforce. Lancet Digit Health. 2020; 2 (6): e282-e285.