medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 27

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2018; 7 (27)

Process Improvement of the Certification of Medical Specialists in Mexico: A Case Study of Otorhinolaryngology

Sánchez-Mendiola M, Bross-Soriano D, Ramírez-García A, Delgado-Maldonado L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 52-60
PDF size: 512.62 Kb.


Key words:

Medical specialty board, certification exam, summative assessment, quality improvement, developing countries, dissemination of innovations, otolaryngology, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Background: The certification of medical specialists is a fundamental task to protect society and document the achievement of competences in a specific field. The medical certifying process has advanced and disseminated globally, becoming more evidence-based, sophisticated and complex. Formal physicians’ certification in Mexico started in 1963, but the quality and validity of the process is heterogeneous due to a variety of reasons. The Mexican Board of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (MBO) was created in 1970. Recently the Board implemented an initiative to diagnose and improve its test development and analysis processes. The objective of this study is to describe the quality improvement process of a medical specialty certification exam in Mexico.
Methods: Single descriptive instrumental case study. Review of the MBO normative documents and previous exams’ reports. Interviews with the Board’s main stakeholders and information obtained during the test development and analysis activities. Implementation of a two-year change process for improvement of the MBO certifying examination, using Downing’s model for test development and Greenhalgh’s model for dissemination of innovations.
Results: A two-year agenda of academic and administrative activities was designed (strategic planning, diagnosis and analysis of the test development and implementation processes, faculty development workshops). Implementation strategies and validity sources for the test were developed. Areas of opportunity were identified and improved. The whole process of test development and analysis was revamped.
Conclusions: Specialty board certification exams in developing countries need to be developed with rigorous methodology. Political, technical, financial and human resource issues that emerged must be addressed. Lessons for the dissemination of sound medical specialty certification strategies are discussed.


REFERENCES

  1. Dauphinee WD. Licensure and Certification. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Series: Springer International Handbooks of Education; 2002, Vol. 7. 835-882.

  2. Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL. Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013; 33 Suppl 1:S20-35.

  3. Hutchinson L, Aitken P, Hayes T. Are medical postgraduate certification processes valid? A systematic review of the published evidence. Med Educ. 2002; 36(1):73-91.

  4. Porras-Hernandez JD, Mora-Fol JR, Lezama-Del Valle P, Yanowsky-Reyes G, Perez-Lorenzana H, Ortega-Salgado A, Aguirre-Jauregui O, Bracho-Blanchet E, Sanchez-Mendiola M. Assessment of the Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery Certification System. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(5):829-35.

  5. Pascual Ramos V, Medrano Ramírez G, Solís Vallejo E, Bernard Medina AG, Flores Alvarado DE, Portela Hernández M, Andrade Ortega L, Vera Lastra O, Espinosa Morales R, Miranda Limón JM, Maldonado Velázquez Mdel R, Jara Quezada LJ, Amezcua Guerra LM, López Zepeda J, Saavedra Salinas MÁ, Arce Salinas CA. Performance of an objective structured clinical examination in a national certification process of trainees in rheumatology. Reumatol Clin. 2015;11(4):215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2014.10.007.

  6. Pascual-Ramos V, Guilaisne Bernard-Medina A, Flores-Alvarado DE, Portela-Hernández M, Maldonado-Velázquez MD, Jara-Quezada LJ, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Rubio-Judith López-Zepeda NE, Álvarez-Hernandez E, Saavedra MÁ, Arce-Salinas CA; Consejo Mexicano de Reumatología (CMR). The method used to set the pass mark in an objective structured clinical examination defines the performance of candidates for certification as rheumatologists. Reumatol Clin. 2017 pii: S1699-258X(16)30163-2. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2016.11.007.

  7. Comité Normativo Nacional de Consejos de Especialidades Médicas, A.C. http://www.conacem.org.mx Accessed July 20, 2016.

  8. Consejo Mexicano de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. http://www.cmorlccc.org.mx Accessed July 20, 2016.

  9. Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 27; 11:100. https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral. com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

  10. Downing SM. Twelve steps for effective test development. In: Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Handbook of Test Development. Eds. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2006:3-25.

  11. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004; 82(4):581-629.

  12. Rogers EM. Four Main Elements in the Diffusion of Innovations. In: Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster Inc. 1995:10-37.

  13. Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Introduction to Assessment in the Health Professions. En: Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. (Eds) Assessment in Health Professions Education. New York, NY: Routledge. 2009:1-21.

  14. Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment. Appl Meas Educ. 2002;15:309-334.

  15. Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 2003; 37:464-469.

  16. Sánchez Mendiola M, Delgado Maldonado L, Flores Hernández F, Leenen I, Martínez González A. “Evaluación del aprendizaje”. En: Sánchez Mendiola M, Lifshitz Guinzberg A, Vilar Puig P, Martínez González A, Varela Ruiz M, Graue Wiechers E. Eds. “Educación Médica: Teoría y Práctica”. Editorial ELSEVIER. México D.F. 2015. Cap. 14, pp. 89 -95.

  17. Karantonis A, Sireci SG. The Bookmark Standard-Setting Method: A Literature Review. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2006; 25(1):4-12.

  18. Clauser BE, Margolis MJ, Case SM. Testing for Licensure and Certification in the Professions. In: Brennan RL. (Ed) Educational Measurement. National Council on Measurement in Education and American Council on Education. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. 4th Ed. 2006:701-731.

  19. Sánchez-Mendiola M, Delgado-Maldonado L. La Certificación de Médicos Especialistas: Bases Conceptuales. In: Sánchez-Mendiola M, Lifshitz-Guinzberg A, Vilar-Puig P, Martínez-González A, Varela-Ruiz M, Graue-Wiechers E. (Eds.) Educación Médica: Teoría y Práctica. México, DF: UNAM/Elsevier. 2015:401-406.

  20. Sánchez-Mendiola M, Delgado-Maldonado L. Exámenes de alto impacto: Implicaciones educativas. Inv Ed Med 2017; 6(21):52-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2016.12.001

  21. Brennan TA, Horwitz RI, Duffy FD. The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement. JAMA. 2004; 292:1038-1043.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2018;7